In the name of Allah, the Most Gracious, the Most Merciful
MUSLIM MEDIA NEW YORK


Home Page

Jewish Daily Part 22. Germans again coerced to pay 800 million for “Jewish survivors of Holocaust.”

(Pervert Jewish gay Ed Koch:  Jewish blood is not cheap. Remember he is the one who demanded to make Iraq a parking lot. Jewish-hired Bushis did it.) Please visit Jewish daily for complete article. Posted: 06/07/13
///////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////
Jewish daily 21. Jewish-hired Berry Obama and occupied Palestinians. He is a Jewish-hired junkyard dog. part 1.  
(Jewish presence always brings death and destruction wherever they live. Muslim Palestine is not an exception)  Please visit Jewish daily for complete article. Posted:: 3/22/13

////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////
Part 20. Jewish Daily. Palestinians for auction: half-million dollar a-piece  

(Roosevelt conspires to plant six million American Jews in Muslim Palestine by buying Ibn Saud with little baksheesh) Please visit Jewish Daily for complet    article. Posted: 02/220/ 13
//////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////
Part 19. Jewish Daily. Pervert American Jewish and homosexuals representatives pollute the Muslim World
(Hillary Clinton is a lesbian and her gay mentor is Eleanor Eldie Acheson. Clinton’s boss Jewish Berry Obama is also a gay. Jewish cult of about 6 million in the world is responsible for perversion of Christian World. Note the Jewish Bloomberg role in converting Christian New York into a gay state. Posted: 11/13/2012. Please visit Jewish Daily for complete article.
//////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////
Nuclear Israel: the threat to humanity!
(Jewish slave Jewish Berry Obama is not blind)
Posted: 09/25/2012. Please visit  American leadership for complete article.
//////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////
Part 18. Jewish Daily. Jewish Berry Obama and Sabra Bibi are joined by hype (Jewish Islamists Madrasas are creating monsters worldwide). Posted: 09/16/12.
Please visit Jewish Daily for complete article.
//////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////

Part 17. Jewish Daily. Jewish Bible Olympic: A tiny Jewish cult demonstrates its presence again
(Jewish Islamist international madrasas breed Jewish Islamists all over the world)
Posted: 09/08/2012. Please visit Muslim Daily for complete article.
///////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////
Part 16. Jews and destruction of Christianity!
(Jewish Adelson and his wife are buying congressional seat in New Jersey). Posted: 08/27/2012. Please visit Jewish Daily for complete article.

////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////

Part 14. Jewish Daily. Jewish Daniel Pipes’ Jewish Allah on shoe soles?
(Allah on shoe soles? Anti-Christ, anti-Muhammad Daniel Pipes demonizes Islam and Muslims) Posted: 08/13/2012. Please visit Jewish Daily for complete article.

/////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////

Part 13. Judeo-Christian common ethic? What a cruel joke!
(Jews do not believe in Christian Lord Christ or New  Testament. No common ethic exists between Judaism and Christianity. Jews use Judeo-Christian slogan as a propaganda tool for fooling the powerful Christian America and using it for fulfilling it Jewish agenda worldwide; at present, to butcher Muslims.

Jewish law: If one gathers wood, hangs him high and starves his daughters). Posted: 07/25/2012. Updated: 07/27/2012. Please visit Jewish Daily for complete article.
///////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////
Part 12. Al Sharpton is a racial arsonist: Jews have a long memory ...Jewish Ed Kotch
(I actually would put a barbed wire around Palestine, and I would begin move the Arab out …. President Roosevelt) posted 07/05/2012. Please visit muslim daily for complete report.
/////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////
Jewish daily part  9. Jewish Islamist rabbis/priests change Judaism again
(Women Jewish Islamist rabbi Jill Hammer marries ‘her’ wife Shoshana Jedwab, a woman). Posted: 07/03/2012. Please visit Muslim daily for the complete report. 
//////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////
Jewish Daily part  8. Jewish Islamists revive Torah and occupy Muslim Palestine.
(Jews for Hitler show their real colors) Posted: 07/01/2012. Please visit Jewish daily report for the complete article.
///////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////
Jewish daily part 7. Smash Jewish tyranny: vote for Charles Barron
(One thing about Charles Barron is, he can be very charming, but so can a snake …Jewish Koch, mayor of New York City and Tel Aviv)
Posted: 06/24/2012. Updated 06/25/2012. Please visit Jewish daily for complete article.
///////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////
Jewish daily part  6. Jewish Islamists: Baby-making machines
(Jewish Islamists now make up nearly one-third of the community and 64 percent of its children) Posted: 06/22/2012. Please visit Jewish daily for complete article
/////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////
Jewish daily part 5. Rogue  and pious nukes? What a Joke!  Posted: 06/13/2012. Please visit Jewish daily for complete article.
/////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////
Jewish daily Part 4.Bloodthirsty Jewish “Jihad Watch” after Muslims and Christians blood. Part 1. Posted: 06/07/2012. Please visit Jewish daily for complete article.
////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////
Jewish daily Part 3. Jews butchered in Alexandria: Why?
(The butchery of the Jews is as old as their existence) Posted: 06/03/2012.  
Please  visit Jewish daily for complete article. 
///////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////
Part 16. U.S. secret documents and occupation of Muslim  Kashmir by anti-Muslim Hindus.

 

(China is destined to disappear for some time as a world force leaving India as the foremost Asiatic power …. Nehru). Please visit secret documents Kashmir for complete article.  Posted: 05/21/2012.
////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////
Part 15. U.S. secret documents and occupation of Muslim Kashmir by anti-Muslim Hindus.
(Neutral Nehru begs and gets the American military aid from Jewish Truman, grandson of Solomon.) [1] Posted: 05/21/2012. Please visit secret documents Kashmir for complete article
///////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////
Part 14. U.S. secret documents and occupation of Muslim Kashmir by anti-Muslim Hindus.
(Nehru occupies Muslim Kashmir for saving his government) Posted: 05/12/2012. Please visit secret documents Kashmir for complete article

///////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////
 Part 2. Jewish Daily New York.1. American Hitler in the making. 2. If he were a pervert Muslim? But he is a chosen one, Jew! 3. Jewish tyranny wins again. 4.  Anti-Christ, anti-Christianity Jews back perversion of Christianity by Jewish Berry Obama. 5.  Iranians watch! 6. Romney Jewish taste. 7. If he were a Muslim mayor? 8. Are you kidding? Jewish Berry Obama exempts the Jews. Please visit Jewish daily for complete article. Posted: 05/11/2012
/////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////// 
Part 13. U.S. secret documents and occupation of Muslim Kashmir by anti-Muslim Hindus.
(India cannot support war in Kashmir for another winter…. Donovan) Posted: 05/05/2012. Please visit secret documents Kashmir for complete article.

//////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////
Part 12. U.S. secret documents and occupation of Muslim Kashmir by anti-Muslim Hindus.
(Truman does not want his secret agent Nehru to be exposed) Posted: 04/29/2012. Please visit secret documents Kashmir for complete article
///////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////
Part 11. U.S. secret documents and occupation of Muslim Kashmir by anti-Muslim Hindus.
Nehru, worshipper of non-violence, begs for arms and ammunition) Posted: 04/26/2012. Please visit secret documents kashmir for complete article.

//////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////

Part 10. U.S. secret documents and occupation of Muslim Kashmir by anti-Muslim Hindus.
(Truman and Nehru share military secret A-Z).

 Posted: 04/23/2012. Please visit secret documents kashmir for complete article. 

//////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////
Part 9. U.S. secret documents and occupation of Muslim Kashmir by anti-Muslim Hindus
(Does Nehru commit a treacherous act by sharing Bharti military information with Truman?) Posted: 04/15/2012. Please visit secret documents kashmir for complete article.  
//////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////
Part 8. U.S. secret documents and occupation of Muslim Kashmir by anti-Muslim Hindus
(Anti-Muslim Nehru conspires to deprive Security Council seat to the Muslim World) Posted. 04/08/2012. Please visit secret documents kashmir for complete article.
////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////
Dismembering Pakistan again: Baluchistan factor
(Jews and Hindus-hired Rep. Rohrabacher conspires against the Muslim World)
Posted. 03/01/2012. Please visit America destroys Muslims for complete article. 
///////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////
India Abroad: Making anti-Muslim Bharat hero in the Muslim World 
(Hindus and Jews-hired India Abroad deceives the world about anti-Muslim Bharat. Part 3
Aziz Haniffa knows that Bharat has been the secret agent of America and anti-Muslim since its illegitimate creation in 1948) posted: 02/15/2012.  Updated. 02/20/2012.  Please visit anti-muslim hindu media for complete article.
////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////
Jewish God: Jews will rule the world with drones
(Days are coming when Jacob will take root, Israel will bud and blossom and fill the face of the earth like fruit) [1] posted: 02/12/2012
Please visit jewish daily for complete article.
/////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////
Hindus and Jews-hired India Abroad glorifies Ghasita Mal/ Hamburger/ Rushdie) Part 2
(Anti-Muslim India Abroad uses  Hindus and Jews hired-prostitute, Ghasita Mal/Hamburger/Sir Ahmed Salman Rushdie for demonizing Islam and Muslims of the World) Please visit anti-muslim hindu media and destruction of the Muslim World for the complete article. Posted. 02/05/2012.
/////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////
Israel, light unto nations, shines again
(Judaism is the worst enemy of women).Jews and women rights series No. 4 posted 01/31/2012. Please visit Jews and women rights for complete article.
///////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////
 Jewish Talmud: A Jew may marry a three year old girl (specifically, three years "and a day" old). Jews and women rights series No. 3.  Posted: 01. 25. 2012. Please visit Jews and women rights for complete article.  
/////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////
Jewish Talmud: Christian girls are filth. Jews and women rights series No. 2. Please visit Jews and women rights for details. Posted: 01. 23. 2012  
////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////
Jewish Talmud: Christian Women are animals. Please visit Jews and women rights for details. Jews and women rights no. 2. Posted:1.22. 2012  
//////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////
Part 7. U.S. secret documents and occupation of Muslim Kashmir by anti-Muslim Hindus
(Nehru commits to wage war against Soviet Union in 1948. “This brought him [Sir Girja Shankar Bajpai] to the principle point he [Sir Girja] desired to make. Should the world once again became in conflict [Third World War], India could only associate itself with those nations holding the same ideals of freedom and democracy. However, his Government in not able to make an open declaration of its position as it could now withstand the aggression from Russia or the internal difficulties which might ensue … Loy W. Henderson
For the complete article, please visit secret documents Kashmir.  Posted 01/20/2012) update 01/22/2012
/////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////
Robber Jews rob the Christian nations series  No. 1
Scott Rothstein: If he were a Muslim? Part 1.
(You shall steal, except Jews. Robbing Christian nations is mandatory for the Jewish race) 01/17/2012.. Please visit robber jews rob for complete article.
/////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////
Part 6. U.S. secret documents and occupation of Muslim Kashmir by anti-Muslim Hindus
(Nehru's eyes have been opened and his attitude toward Russia has definitely stiffened… American Ambassador Grady. Nehru is standing naked in the world public square. Real Nehru stand up!). For the complete article, please visit secret documents kashmir. posted 12/27/2011. Updated 12/28/2011
/////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////// 
Part 7. U.S. secret documents and occupation of Muslim Kashmir by anti-Muslim Hindus(Nehru commits to wage war against Soviet Union in 1948. “This brought him [Sir Girja Shankar Bajpai] to the principle point he [Sir Girja] desired to make. Should the world once again became in conflict [Third World War], India could only associate itself with those nations holding the same ideals of freedom and democracy. However, his Government in not able to make an open declaration of its position as it could now withstand the aggression from Russia or the internal difficulties which might ensue … Loy W. HendersonFor the complete article, please visit secret documents Kashmir.  Posted 01/20/2012) update 01/22/2012/////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////Robber Jews rob the Christian nations series  No. 1Scott Rothstein: If he were a Muslim? Part 1. (You shall steal, except Jews. Robbing Christian nations is mandatory for the Jewish race) 01/17/2012.. Please visit robber jews rob for complete article. /////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////Part 6. U.S. secret documents and occupation of Muslim Kashmir by anti-Muslim Hindus(Nehru's eyes have been opened and his attitude toward Russia has definitely stiffened… American Ambassador Grady. Nehru is standing naked in the world public square. Real Nehru stand up!). For the complete article, please visit secret documents kashmir. posted 12/27/2011. Updated 12/28/2011/////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////// 

Part 5. U.S. Secret documents and occupation of Muslim Kashmir by anti-Muslim Hindus

(Bharti Ambassador Lakshmi Pandit, sister of Prime Minister Nehru, is the “listening post” of America… U.S. Ambassador Smith. Nehru is standing naked in the world public square. Real Nehru stand up). For the complete article, please visit secret documents kasshmir.  Posted 12/19/2020. Updated 12/28/2011

///////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////
Part 4. U.S. secret documents and occupation of Muslim Kashmir by anti-Muslim Hindus

(Nehru commits to fight against Russia. Nehru is standing naked in the world public square. Real Nehru stand up) Posted 12/19/2011. For the complete article, please visit page secret documents kashmir. Updated 12/28/2011 

///////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////
Dismemberment of Pakistan and Stephen Cohen
(“If we see that Germany is winning, we ought to help Russia, and if Russia is winning we ought to help Germany, and that way let them kill as many as possible.” Jewish Truman, grandson of Jewish Solomon ) for complete article, please visit Muslim World.Posted: 12/2//2011 ///////////////////////////////////////////////////////////
Amir Mir enemy of patriotic forces Part 1.

(Anti-Muslim-alliance hired prostitute Amir Mir strikes again. This time he grills the patriotic forces who do not surrender) posted: 11/29/2011. Please visit Muslim World for the article.

////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////
Americans who stood against the Jewish tyranny?
(If we have to choose between the Negev and America, we will keep the Negev … Jewish leadership) [10] Part 1. Please visit  jewishleadership for complete article. Posted: 11/15/2011
///////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////
US secret documents and destruction of Muslim Palestine

(Truman and British have different agenda about Muslim Palestine. Israel: the bastard child of the United Nations) Part 6 Posted: 11/1/2011

For complete article, please visit jewishleadership

/////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////
U.S. secret documents and destruction of Muslim Palestine Series No. 5 

(Israel: the bastard child of  the United Nations)
For complete article, please visit Jewish leadership  Update: 10/31/2011

///////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////
U.S. secret documents and destruction of Muslim Palestine Series No. 4 Posted: 
(Israel: the bastard child of the United Nations) 10/27/2011.  Update: 10/31/2011  
/////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////
Bhart-South Africa nuclear connection 
(Bharti deceptive role from Non-Align Movement to 
the formation of IBSA) posted: 10/20/2011. For complete article, please visit Muslim World. Updated: 10/24/2011
/////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////
Iran next?
(Informer proposes  the assassination of Saudi ambassador.  Arabsour neither proposes nor agrees with the assassination plot) Posted: 10/17/2011. updated 10/20/2011Complete article under American leadership. Updated 10/24/2011
///////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////
Brahmins and Jews hire India Abroad) Part 1.
(Lies from A to Z) Updated: 10/24/2011. Up dated: 10/29/2011
- Nehru was already in the pocket of Truman. For this reason, there was no need for balancing “socialist India” by bribing Pakistan 
- American aid to Pakistan was to recruit another lackey against the Soviet block
- In the vocabulary of any dominant power, “friendship,” “commerce,” and “navigation” are the coded words to recruit leaderships of bribed countries.
- Lakshmi Pandit, Bharti ambassador in Soviet Union, was the “listening post” of America.
- Nehru committed to wage war against Soviet Union
- Nehru pled Truman that his veil of neutrality must not be lifted
- Nehru was the secret agent of Truman
- Bomb Tel Aviv and Delhi and then watch how many homegrown Hindu and Jewish terrorists mushroom
- Understanding between Saudi Arabia and Iran is a must to save the Muslim World from the anti-Muslim forces led by the United States

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 Jafar Syed
M.A. LL.B. Researcher – International Affairs
New York

“The United States of America has been trying to buy the good will of the people of Pakistan by giving them aid – both militarily and economically.
 
“I [vidya Bhushan Gupta] agree that we should aid other countries for humanitarian reasons, but only time will tell if this strategy is going to work in Pakistan, which has become accustomed to receiving US aid since its birth and yet hates the US. Initially, it received aid to balance the influence of socialist India …” [1]

The answer is that US aid to Pakistan was not to buy the good will of Pakistan and to balance ‘socialist India.”  

Financial aid to Pakistan was to recruit another lackey against the Soviet block. Proof? Here it is. “Sir, I have the Honor to refer to secret dispatch no. 21 from the American Embassy at Karachi, dated January 13, 19448, that consideration be given providing some financial aid to Pakistan of a treaty of friendship, commerce’ and navigation.” [2]

In the vocabulary of any dominant power, friendship,” “commerce,” and “navigation” are the coded words to recruit leaderships in the vocabulary of any dominant power.

Second, “So-called “socialist India” of Nehru was the secret agent of America; therefore, there was no need of balancing the influence of socialist India by bribing Pakistan.  Proof? Here it is.  Lakshmi Pandit, Bharti ambassador to Soviet Union, was the “listening post” of America.

Proof? Here it is.
“The nature of U.S. Bharat relations is the worst cover up since 1947. In fact, Nehru, the so-called champion of Asia and Africa, was the secret agent of the United States.
“[U.S. Ambassador Smith in Soviet Union] Can confirm information given by Chinese Ambassador New Delhi to Ambassador Grady on statements of Mrs. Pandit. She has had similar confidential conversation with me and, I believe, with heads of all missions in Moscow except Soviet satellites.
“She is obviously much concerned at Molotov’s change in attitude, but there is no real reason why she should be as both British Ambassador and myself had warned her honeymoon period for her would be last few months and thereafter she would have to take bitter with sweet, with emphasis on former
“She asked my advice as to whether, in event public opinion in India further aroused, it would be good move for India to discontinue present relations with USSR, and said public opinion in India so aroused it would probably be difficult to send another chief of mission when she left. I told her I thought it would be tactical disadvantage, as India so close to USSR it should be decided advantage to maintain adequate listening post. [3]
Another proof that “socialist India” was already in the pocket of Truman: “Socialist” Nehru and “socialist India” committed themselves to wage war against communist Soviet Union of Stalin as ally of the capitalist America of Truman.   
“At his request I [Grady, U.S. ambassador in India] saw last evening H. V.
R. Iengar, Acting Secretary General External Affairs in Bajpai’s absence. Prime Minister wished him to discuss with me recent statement on foreign policy that Prime Minister made in Assembly. Prime Minister wanted to be sure US did not misunderstand what he was endeavoring to convey. The speech he said was primarily for home consumption and to say certain things to Russia which he felt should be said. He said that it was unthinkable that India should be on Russia’s side in event of conflict between Russia and US. American principles of democracy and those of India were identical. He wishes to maintain officially for his government a neutral position.” [4]
But Nehru had only request that Truman did not lift its neutrality veil.
This tactic worked well for the America of Truman and Bharat of Nehru. Nehru, secret agent of America, became the baghwan of the liberated forces of Asia and Africa, specifically of the Muslim World.  Note his close relations with Jamal Abdul Nasser of Egypt.  Open agent of America, Pakistan, lost its credibility in the eyes of the liberated forces of Asia, Africa, and specifically in the Muslim World.
Website visitors, please give the reference of muslimmediany.org, muslimdailyny.org, jewishleadershipwatchny, org, and hinduleadershipwatchny.org whenever any excerpt is referred. Thank you
Notes
1. Can the US buy Pak Goodwill, India Abroad, 10/14/2011
2. India. Discussion between the United States and India concerning India’s attitudes toward the United States and the Soviet Union, and Indian request for financial and military aid, US Foreign Relations, 1948, volume V, 495.
3. Bharat is the partner of NATO (Nehru was the secret agent of the United States) 10/09/2011
4. Ibid
5. Ibid
///////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////
Bharat is a partner of NATO
(Nehru was the secret agent of the United States) 10/09/2011

Jafar Syed
M.A., LL.B.
Researcher – International Affairs
New York

The nature of U.S. Bharat relations is the worst cover up since 1947. In fact, Nehru, the so-called champion of Asia and Africa, was the secret agent of the United States. 

Proof? Here it is.

“[U.S. Ambassador Smith in Soviet Union] Can confirm information given by Chinese Ambassador New Delhi to Ambassador Grady on statements of Mrs. Pandit. She has had similar confidential conversation with me and, I believe, with heads of all missions in Moscow except Soviet satellites. 

“She is obviously much concerned at Molotov’s change in attitude, but there is no real reason why she should be as both British Ambassador and myself had warned her honeymoon period for her would be last few months and thereafter she would have to take bitter with sweet, with emphasis on former

“She asked my advice as to whether, in event public opinion in India further aroused, it would be good move for India to discontinue present relations with USSR, and said public opinion in India so aroused it would probably be difficult to send another chief of mission when she left. I told her I thought it would be tactical disadvantage, as India so close to USSR it should be decided advantage to maintain adequate listening post. [1]

What this documentary proof proves? Ambassador Lakshmi Pundit, sister of Prime Minister Nehru, was the listening post of the United States. She was attending the meetings of the Soviet Union, and after attending the meetings, she was catering the information to representatives of the United States and other client states of the United States.

Here is another proof, out of hundreds, that Nehru was the secret argent of the United States. 

“At his request I [Grady, U.S. ambassador in India] saw last evening H. V.
R. Iengar, Acting Secretary General External Affairs in Bajpai’s absence. Prime Minister wished him to discuss with me recent statement on foreign policy which Prime Minister made in Assembly. Prime Minister wanted to be sure US did not misunderstand what he was endeavoring to convey. The speech he said was primarily for home consumption and to say certain things to Russia which he felt should be said. He said that it was unthinkable that India should be on Russia’s side in event of conflict between Russia and US. American principles of democracy and those of India were identical. He wishes to maintain officially for his government a neutral position.” [2]

What this document proves is that Nehru was assuring the United States that Bharat is an ally of the United States of America in case of a war but this alliance should not be exposed. 

It was Nehru’s Bharat of 1948.  Today, it is Bharat of Manmohan  Singh that is controlled by remote control by the Nehru dynasty.  Today, veil of neutrality is no more required. Today, Bharat of Manmohan Singh  is the partner of the NATO. 

“Interestingly, the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO) formally conveyed to New Delhi in early September an invitation for India to become a "partner" in its ballistic missile program and the Indian defense establishment is actively considering the NATO invitation with an eye on checkmating China's capabilities.” [3]

Muslim World should know this reality, specifically Zardari and Sharif, friends of Bharat.
Visitors of the website, the main objective of the website is to expose the anti-humanity forces by giving documentary proofs. Please give the reference of muslimmediany.org, muslimdailyny.org, jewishleadershipwatchny,org and hinduleadershipwatchny.org whenever any excerpt is referred. Thank you.
Notes
1. Brahmins honorary membership in the Whiteman club (Indian Abroad muffles the dark reality again. Vijaya Lakshmi Pandit was the listening post of America in Soviet Union), muslimdailyny.org
2. Part 4. Nehru commits to wage war against Russia as US allies in 1948
(U.S. Secret documents and Truman Nehru closet relations), muslimdailyny.org
3.  M K Bhadrakumar, Putin enters the dragon's den, Asia Times, 10/08/20
 
//////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////
China will watch the destruction of Iran by the Jews
(Red capitalists of China are friend of Israel)
Posted: 10/08/2011
Highlights
- Red capitalists of China give a green light to Israel to attack Iran
- China’s U-turn about Israel did not take place in 1911. It buckled under US pressure and cancelled its nuclear contracts with Iran in 1995
- Defense Secretary Panetta deceives the world when he lectures Netanyahu to avoid unilateral action against Iran while his boss Obama agrees to give 55 bunker-busting GBU-28 bombs in the bloody hands of Netanyahu
- Traitor Sadat sold the Muslim World to the European Jewish occupier of the Muslim Palestine
- Carter legitimized  the occupation of Muslim Palestine by the European Jews
- Anti-Muslim American, French, and the British alliance weds to the Jew
- To save the Muslim World, Saudi Arabia and Iran must patch their differences.
- Egypt must play its vital role to end the European Jewish occupation of Muslim Palestine. 
- Netanyahu is targeting every Muslim country in the Muslim Middle East and beyond

Jafar Syed
M.A. LL.B.
Researcher-International Affairs
New York

Iran nuclear program is neither for peaceful purpose nor in the national interests of China. And if Israel attacks Iran, China will not stop it. Proof? Here it is.

“Of course we understand that Iran aims to acquire nuclear weapons and we are concerned about this.

"While it [Iran] declares that its nuclear program is intended for peaceful purposes, the Chinese government and intelligence services believe that Iran wants to build a nuclear bomb.
"It is not in China's interest for Iran to have nuclear weapons." [1]
And if Israel attacks Iran, “China will not stop Israel if it decides to attack Iran.” [2]
Chinese Prof. Ying Gang made these statements in Israel. Signal, an Israeli organization, invited Prof. Gang to address a symposium. [3]

China sided with Arabs against Israel in Cold War, but now it is a friend of Israel. Proof? Here it is. 

"It is a policy based on our philosophy of refraining from taking sides in conflicts.

"We try to remain neutral in the Middle East conflict. In the past, during the Cold War, we sided with the Arabs against Israel. But this has changed. Today we see ourselves as friends of Israel, and at the same time we attempt to maintain friendly relations with all countries. [4]

China’s U-turn about Israel did not take place in 2011. The “red capitalists” of China started buckling under the US pressure in 1995 by cancelling its nuclear contracts with the Iran. Proof? Here it is.

“To prove his [Gang] claim that China acts responsibly in the international arena, he cited the way relations between China and Iran have developed over the years. In 1993, the two countries signed an agreement under which China would sell Iran two relatively small nuclear reactors for producing electricity.
"Only then, in 1995, did America and Israel begin to understand that Iran's nuclear program would also allow it to produce nuclear weapons.
"Washington exerted heavy pressure on us, [China] and we decided to cancel all our nuclear agreements with Iran. The Iranians were angry and imposed various embargoes on us, accusing us of caving in to American and Zionist pressure.
“Ever since, China has been working methodically to convince Iran to cooperate with the international community, demonstrate goodwill and prove that its nuclear program is really intended for peaceful purposes rather than to produce nuclear weapons. For this reason, China also supported Security Council decisions to sanction Iran.” [5]
Is there anybody in the world who can stop the Jewish leadership to attack Iran? The answer is no. Obama administration is in bed with Netanyahu. It has agreed to deliver 55 bunker-busting GBU-28 bombs to Israel. In this context, world should not be deceived by Defense secretary Panetta who is lecturing Netanyahu to avoid unilateral action. Such statements are for managing the world opinion. Proof? Here it is.
"I think the most effective way to deal with Iran is not on a unilateral basis," Defense Secretary Leon Panetta told reporters in Israel on Tuesday, stressing that the Israeli government needed to act in concert and consensus with the international community. Israeli reporters noted his repeated use of the word together when it came to dealing with Iran. Panetta's comments, coming barely a month after the U.S. reportedly agreed to deliver 55 bunker-busting GBU-28 bombs to Israel, were widely viewed as an "down, boy" message to any adventurist bomb-Iran impulses on the part of Israel's Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and Defense Minister Ehud Barak. [6]
Defense Secretary Leon Panetta, you know that  “Israel is reported to possess a 200 kilogram nuclear warhead containing 6 kilograms of weapons-grade plutonium that could be mounted on the sea launched cruise missiles and producing a Yield of 20 kilo tons.” [7]

And, Turkish Prime Minister Recep Tayipp Erdogan, your statements against Israel have no meaning when you agree recently with NATO to install its anti-ballistic missile radar on your border with Iran. Proof? Here it is. 
"And let me ask you," he continued, "who is under threat? Is it Israel or the countries in the vicinity of Israel that are under threat? Israel has nuclear weapons. How can you explain this to me? There are no sanctions on Israel, but all the other countries in the neighborhood are suffering from sanctions... It would be unacceptable for us to ratify this approach. There's injustice there." [8]

Lessons for the Muslim World.

Lesson No.1. Unholy alliance and destruction of the Muslim World. Where is the proof? Here it is.  

Forget the past. Only view the Muslim destruction after World War 11 by Great Britain, France, and America and its regional arms Israel and Bharat. Note the aggressions against Egypt, Iraq, Iran, Sudan, Somalia, Lebanon, Afghanistan, Libya, and Syria.  Note the dismemberment of Pakistan, Sudan, and Indonesia.

View from another angle where the Muslim world is in practical term. Muslim Countries have two choices: either to become US agent or to be destroyed. Proof? Iran was a US occupied country under Shah or Iran. The moment patriotic forces ended this occupation in 1979, destruction of Iran began. Proof No. 2. Egypt was a British occupied country under Shah Farooq. The moment patriotic forces removed this British stooge and tried to charter a patriotic course, destruction of Egypt begins. Another acrobat by the anti-Muslim unholy alliance.  The same Egypt became the darling of anti-Muslim alliance when traitor Anwar Sadat sold the Palestinians and the entire Muslim World by singing “peace treaty” with the Israel in 1979.

Lesson No. 2. “Peace” helps the European Jewish occupiers of Palestine.  Proof? Here it is.  Detail of the benefits Jewish occupiers of Muslim Palestine reaped from this treacherous   act of traitor Anwar Sadat. 

“It was the first time that the vast stretch of territory form the headwaters of the Jordan to the sources of the Nile  had become an area of peace; that the only link between Africa and Asia – the Sinai desert, so long a barrier – had been transformed into a bridge; that Cairo became the nearest capital accessible to Jerusalem. It was the first time that Israel had breached the wall of regional segregation and attained Arab recognition of its sovereign legitimacy; and the first time that the cry of battle had given way to the vow of ‘no more war’.
“This solemn pledge, pronounced in Jerusalem by the President of Egypt and the Prime Minister of Israel, became the foundation stone of the first edifice of Arab-Israel peace. [9]

If Jewish occupation of Muslim Palestine exists today, the main reason is the traitorous act of traitor Anwar Sadat.

Lesson No. 3. Occupied Muslim World must not be deceived by the word “peace.” Proof? Here it is. It is President Carter concept of “peace.”  What he is really asking the occupied Palestinians and the Muslim World to accept and legitimize the occupation of Muslim Palestine by the European Jews.
“I think all of you know that there has been either war or potential war in the Middle East for the last 29 years, ever since Israel became a nation. I think one of the finest acts of the world nations that's ever occurred was to establish the State of Israel.
So, the first prerequisite of a lasting peace is the recognition of Israel by her neighbors, Israel's right to exist, Israel's right to exist permanently, Israel's right to exist in peace. That means that over a period of months or years that the borders between Israel and Syria, Israel and Lebanon, Israel and Jordan, Israel and Egypt must be opened up to travel, to tourism, to cultural, exchange, to trade, so that no matter who the leaders might be in those countries, the people themselves will have formed a mutual understanding and comprehension and a sense of a common purpose to avoid the repetitious wars and death that have afflicted that region so long. That's the first prerequisite of peace. [10]
Lesson No. 3. Unholy Alliance of America, Great Britain, and France is wedded to the Jewish occupation of Muslim Palestine. Where is the  Proof? Here it is.
“I hope you will let me see beforehand the text of any message you are thinking of sending me upon the anniversary of the Atlantic Charter on August 14. We consider the wording of that famous document line by line together and I should not be able, without mature consideration, to give it a wider interpretation than was agreed between us at the time. Its proposed application to Asia and Africa requires much thought. Great embarrassment would be caused to the defense of India at the present time by such a statement as the Office of War Information has been forecasting. [1] Here in the Middle East the Arabs might claim majority they could expel the Jews from Palestine, or at any time forbid all further immigration. I am strongly wedded to the Zionist policy, of which I was as one of the authors. This is only one of the many unforeseen cases which will arise from new and further declarations.
“Would it not be sufficient to dwell on the progress made in this memorable year, to the growth of the United Nations, to the continued magnificent resistance of Russia to aggression, to the success of the arms of United States in the Pacific, and to the growth of our combined air power? Finally we could reaffirm our principles and point to the hope of a happier world after some preliminary intervening unpleasantness had been satisfactorily got over. I am sure you will consider my difficulties with the kindness you always show to me. 1. In its broadcasts, the Officer of War Information had stressed the commitment of the Atlantic Charter signatories to the principal of self-determination for all people. [11]
Lesson No. 4. Bloodletting and the bleeding Muslim World. Unholy and Anti-Muslim alliance of America, Great Britain, France, and their regional arms Jewish occupiers of Muslim Palestine and Hindu occupiers of Muslim Kashmir are targeting the Muslim World with its lethal and bloody tactic of “bloodletting.”
What is bloodletting?
“Bloodletting is a more promising variant of this strategy. Here, the aim is to make sure that any war between one’s rival turns into a long and costly conflict that saps their strength. There is no baiting in this version: the rivals have gone to war independently, and the blood-letter is mainly concerned with causing its rivals to bleed each other white, while it stays out of the fighting. As a senator, Harry Truman had this strategy in mind in June 1941 when he reacted to the Nazi invasion of the Soviet Union by saying. “If we see that Germany is winning we ought to help Russia, and if Russia is winning we ought to help Germany, and that way let them kill as many as possible.
“The United States also pursued this strategy against the Soviet Union in Afghanistan during the 1980s.”
Proof of bloodletting in the Muslim World. Glaring proofs of this bloodletting are the Somalis murdering Somalis, Afghanis murdering Afghanis, Iraqis murdering Iraqis, Syrians murdering Syrians, and Libyans murdering Libyans. Unholy Alliance is helping one warring party in all these cases. [12]
Lesson No. 5. America is fighting the Bharti war in Afghanistan. Proof? Here it is. America is murdering Afghanis on behalf of Bharat.
Question: “The likes of C. Raja Mohan, one India’s leading foreign policy analysts, and others have expressed concerns over the possibility of an Obama administration being activists in India-Pakistan relations, particularly over Kashmir …
Answer: “I like him [Mohn], I respect him, and he is one of the sharpest [Indian strategic thinkers], but his options for India are totally incompatible with each other, and that epitomizes to me the ambivalence of India towards strategy generally and towards Pakistan in particular. The United States can’t wait; we are fighting that war in part for Indian interests. If the Indians have a better way of fighting it than we do, please let’s hear from them. I really think there are opportunities for a really meaningful dialogue. [13]
Lesson No. 6. America is occupying the World.
“America as world power. The drive for territorial and economic expansion has been a dominant theme of the American experience. The descendants and followers of those who settled Jamestown, Plymouth, and Massachusetts Bay were adventurous pragmatists whose acquisitiveness drove them beyond their legitimate boundaries and gained them a power. The new nation wrested the Mississippi boundary from England and grasped at the opportunity to acquire Louisiana; it had the temerity to issue the Monroe Doctrine and the ruthlessness to instigate the Mexican War. Toward the close of the nineteenth century this drive became flagrantly imperialist as the maturing nation succeeded in extending its influence from the Caribbean to China, with implications envisioned by only an astute few.
“A great national aberration. There are two general approaches to nineteenth-century American imperialism. In its more narrow conception, imperialism has been viewed as the denial of one nation’s sovereignty by another nation: in its broader definition, control of another people’s resources, trade, and markets, even if such control does not bring with it the total loss of territorial integrity and national sovereignty, is seen as imperialistic. In this chapter, the concept is utilized in its border sense.
“Some “New Left” historians, such as William Appleman Williams, have insisted that if the concepts of expansionism and imperialism are enlarged to include the economic sphere, the nation has been imperialistic from its very inception. Preferring the term “colonialism” to “imperialism,” Walter La Feber suggests that the ‘the United States did not set out on an expansionist path in the late 1890s in a sudden, spur-of-the-moment fashion. The overseas empire that America controlled in 1900 was not a break in their territory, but a natural culmination…. American neither acquired this empire during a temporary absence of mind nor had the empire forced upon them. Another commentator, Richard Van Alstyne, has observed that ‘The early colonies were no sooner established in the seventeenth century than expansionist impulses began to register in each of them. Imperial patterns took shape, and before the middle of the eighteenth century the concept of an empire that would take in the whole continent was fully formed.
Last word. Visitors of the website, the main objective of the website is to expose the anti-humanity forces by giving documentary proofs. In this article, documentary proofs are submitted on the following topics 1. Do not expect any opposition from China if Jewish occupiers of Palestine attack Iran 2. Obama is equipping the Jewish occupiers of Palestine for attacking Iran. 3. Benefits Jewish occupier of Palestine reaped from the treacherous act of traitor Sadat 4. Carter legitimized the European Jewish occupation in the name of “peace.” 5. Anti-Muslim alliance weds with the Jews. 6. America is murdering Afghanis for the Hindu occupiers of Kashmir 7. Americans are occupiers since they occupy America 1607. 8. If the anti-Muslim alliance is ready to blow Iran for trying to become nuclear, what about the Jewish nukes that have been targeting the Muslim countries.
“Is Netanyahu the first prime minister of Jewish occupied Muslim Palestine who wants to nuke Muslim countries? The answer is no. It is the policy of the Jewish leadership of the occupied Muslim Palestine  to nuke every Muslim Country in the Middle East. Proof? Here it is. “… Israel has nuclear warheads aimed at 68-70  different cities in the world, including cities in every Arab country in the Middle East. Israel also has 200 atomic mines – even more than Britain has – located in holes on the Golan Heights [15]
Website visitors, please give the reference of muslimmediany.org, muslimdailyny.org, jewishleadershipwatchny,org and hinduleadershipwatchny.org whenever any excerpts is referred. Thank you.

 Notes 
1-5. Yossi Malman, China will not stop Israel if it decides to attack Iran, Haaretz, 09/22/2011
6 and 8. Tony Karon, Is Israel again weighing an attack on Iranian nuclear facilities? Times Magazine, 10/04/2011
7. Newsmax.com, 04/02/2010.
9. Gideon Rafael, Destination Peace, P. xi,
10. President Carter, March 16, 1977
11. Francis L. Loewenheim, Harold D. Langley, and Manfred Jonas, Roosevelt and Churchill, Their Secret Wartime Correspondence, Document 155P. Churchill to Roosevelt, P. 234
12. Ronald Caridi, 20th Century, American foreign Policy and self-interest
13. India Abroad, November 21, 2008
14. Occupation of the World by the American began with the occupation of America by the British colonists in 1607.
14. Netanyahu will nuke Iran before winter. Jewish Berry Obama is a rag to wipe the feet of Netanyahu, Muslimdailyny.org, October 04, 2011.
///////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////
Netanyahu will nuke Iran before winter
(Jewish Berry Obama is a rag to wipe the feet of Netanyahu)
Posted. October 4, 2011.

Highlights
- Netanyahu religious and political leader worships murderer like Baruch Goldstein and racist rabbi Yitzhak Ginsberg
- Palestine is the Jewish land exclusively … Netanyahu religious and political leader
- Peace is not in the vocabulary of Netanyahu. Netanyahu opposed peace treaty with Israel, first Oslo, and Oslo 2.
- Netanyahu was ready to nuke Saddam’s Iraq
- Israel nuclear warheads aimed at 68-70 different cities in the world, including cities in every Arab country in the Middle East … The Jewish Press
- Israel has 200 atomic mines – even more than Britain has – located in the holes of Golan Heights … The Jewish Press

Jafar Syed
M.A. LL.B.
Researcher- International Affairs
New York 

Netanyahu commitment for a Palestinian state is a sham. “Relying on the Lubavitcher Rebbe and his teachings in a speech that was ostensibly in favor of a Palestinian state is like relying on a racist who fervently supports slavery in a speech that is ostensibly in favor of abolition, while also making abolition contingent upon conditions that will never be met.” [1]

Why is Netanyahu commitment for Palestinian state shame? Because Netanyahu’s religious and political leader is a Lubavitcher Rebbe who does not believe in any circumstances to accept the existence of Arabs in the entire Jewish-occupied Palestine.
“Benjamin Netanyahu promised to tell the truth at the United Nations, and the truth was indeed revealed. The prime minister chose in this speech to quote reverently from his meetings with one person only: the Lubavitcher Rebbe, who viewed himself as the messiah.
“Neither the source nor the inflammatory quotation was coincidental. Netanyahu was intimately acquainted with the Rabbi King Messiah, and also with the views he expressed from on high. The rebbe's followers stood behind Netanyahu's victorious campaign in the 1996 election, which following the incitement-filled demonstrations and Yitzhak Rabin's assassination, with the slogan "Netanyahu is good for the Jews." And on Sunday, the prime minister's entourage was sent to genuflect at the rebbe's court.”
“After all, he [Netanyahu] is the emissary of the Chabad messiah, the man who taught that this is the Jews' land [Palestine] exclusively.” [2]
 
Note who are the heroes of Netanyahu’s religious and political leader. “The most prominent emissaries of the Lubavitcher Rebbe - the great rabbi, as Netanyahu termed him at the United Nations - included Baruch Goldstein, perpetrator of the 1994 Hebron massacre, and Yitzhak Ginsburg, the rabbi of Yitzhar,  of the radical books "Baruch the Man" (which celebrates the massacre ) and "The King's Torah: The Laws of Killing  A. Gentiles." Nor was this by chance. The Lubavitcher Rebbe inculcated his followers with the doctrine of "your people are the land's only nation": In the land of the messiah, there is no room for Arabs. [3]
 
Netanyahu is the true follower of his religious leader.  Proof?   “Thus racism entered Netanyahu's   speech at the United Nations - not "merely" against Islam, but also against Arabs: They, he said, are not like your neighbors in New York. [4]

In addition to the teaching of his religious leader, Netanyahu’s past also demonstrates that he is fooling the world when he talks about a Palestinian state.  “Netanyahu opposed peace with Egypt and the first Oslo accord. He led a campaign of incitement against the Oslo-2 agreement and then refused to implement it. Ariel Sharon, Rafael Eitan and then-Israel Defense Forces Chief of Staff Amnon Lipkin-Shahak were stunned by what they interpreted as his willingness to consider arming doomsday weapons in the face of Saddam Hussein's threats, and they worked to dissuade him. Netanyahu opposed the pullouts from Lebanon and Gaza, and not because he thought they should have been done by agreement. Nor did he respond to Mahmoud Abbas' moderation by taking advantage of the opportunity: Instead, he waged a campaign of incitement to preempt any chance of a deal and a withdrawal.” [5]

Forget about the Palestinian State, Netanyahu is opening a new front against the Muslim World by nuking Iran. “This is the background to what must become a global understanding of the issue that is now most important of all, which will also be the main topic of U.S. Defense Secretary Leon Panetta's visit. Netanyahu is completely serious in his desire, and also in his preparations to circumvent the warnings of the entire defense establishment in order to implement this desire, which many of those in his inner circle have defined as messianic: to attack Iran before winter. Before the clouds come, anyone who can stop him must do so.” [6]

Will Obama stop this Jewish “top dog”? The answer is no. Why? Because Jewish Berry Obama is a rag to wipe the feet of Netanyahu. “After all, he is the emissary of the Chabad messiah, the man who taught that this is the Jews' land exclusively. He returned from the United States with the feeling that the American government is a rag to wipe his feet on, with no power to stop his most extremist plans.

“top-dog” phrase is borrowed from racist Jewish “Jihad Watch” website.

Is Netanyahu the first prime minister of Jewish occupied Muslim Palestine who wants to nuke Muslim countries? The answer is no. It is mlthe policy of the Jewish leadership of the occupied Muslim Palestine  to nuke every Muslim Country in the Middle East. Proof? Here it is. “… Israel has nuclear warheads aimed at 68-70 different cities in the world, including cities in every Arab country in the Middle East. Israel also has 200 atomic mines – even more than Britain has – located in holes on the Golan Heights [7]
Notes
1. Expert from 1-6 are from the article “Netanyahu's messianism could launch attack on Iran” by Sefi Rachlevsky. Article was published on 09/27/2011 in Haaretz.
7.  Why is Israel P.M. Rabin Afraid? Israel’s nukes ready for action.  Could wipe out all enemy countries, The Jewish Press, February 10, 1994.  It was 1994. How many more Muslim countries are aimed at by the Jewish leadership of occupied Muslim Palestine in 2011? It must not less than 1994.
 
Note. The main objective of the website is to help the website visitors to have proofs to expose the anti-humanity forces. Whenever any expert is used, please give the reference of these sources. 1. Muslimdailyny.org 2.  
 

///////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////
Jews remember Khaibar
(Jewish-hired Christian prostitutes O’Reilly, Limbough, Hannity, Beck and others, can you dare to say that Jewish bible is a book of violence?) Posted: 06/19/2011
Highlights

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

- Who will dare to say in the Muslim World: Khaybar-Khaybar ya Yahud, Jaysh Muhammad sa Ya’ud.  Amrozi bin Nurhasin
- Who will dare to say in the Muslim World: 1.3 billion Muslims cannot be defeated by a few million Jews … Malaysian Prime Minister, Mahathir Mohammad
-Who will dare to say in the Muslim World: The prophet, prayer and peace be upon him, said: The Day of Judgment will not come about until Moslems fight the Jews (killing the Jews), when the Jews will hide behind stones and trees. The stones and trees will say, ‘O Moslems, O Abdullah, there is a Jew behind me, come and kill him.’”
Ungrateful race: No nation has ever done more harm to Israel. None has matched it in debasing and humiliating us more.  None has been able to reduce us as they have…. Jewish sage Maimonides
Ungrateful race: The Jews were never free of discrimination, but only rarely subject to persecution, never as bad as in Christendom at its worst, nor ever as good as in Christendom at its best. There is nothing in Islamic history to parallel the Spanish expulsion and Inquisition, the Russian pogroms, or the Nazi Holocaust.  There was nothing in the history of Jews under Islam to compare with the progressive emancipation and acceptance accorded to Jews in the democratic West during the last three centuries.
-Who can dare to say: Israel would soon cease to exist; it was because that is God’s will … Arab voices
-  Jewish bible is a book of violence. “Israelites are commanded to murder all the people of the land where they intend to live, and to kill all the people of foreign nations that do not submit themselves in slavery.” (RSV) Deuteronomy

Jafar Syed
M.A. LL.B.
Researcher – International Affairs
New York

Jewish sage Maimonides is wrong and dishonest when he says that Muslims are the worst enemies of the Jews.

“In the Twelfth Century, six hundred years after the death of Mohammed, the Jewish sage Maimonides, known to Muslims as Musa ibn Maymun, gave his own answer to that question. Describing the situation of the Jews after five centuries of Muslim rule, he wrote: ‘No nation has ever done more harm to Israel. None has matched it in debasing and humiliating us more.  None has been able to reduce us as they have. (1)

Jewish sage knows that what Christians have been doing to the Jews in the Christian World. Muslims did not continue the death penalty, which was imposed by the pagan Romans and continued by Christian Romans for the Jews if they are found in Jerusalem. Jewish sage knows they were Muslims who annulled the death penalty when they ended the White occupation of Palestine in 638. Jewish sage knows that how Jews were treated by the Christian World since the Romans emperor became Christians and before by Pagan Romans. Jewish sage knows that Muslim World was the only safe heaven for the persecuted Jews of the Christian World.

Jewish Bernard Lewis is dishonest when he says that democratic West emancipated and accepted Jews.

“At the end of the Twentieth Century, Bernard Lewis, a lifelong student of Jews and Islam and himself a Jew, reflected on the fourteen centuries of Jewish life under Islamic rule, eight centuries after Maimonides’ damning verdict. Lewis writes: ‘The Jews were never free of discrimination, but only rarely subject to persecution.’ He noted that the situation of the Jews living under Islamic rulers was ‘never as bad as in Christendom at its worst, nor ever as good as in Christendom at its best.’ Lewis observed that ‘there is nothing in Islamic history to parallel the Spanish expulsion and Inquisition, the Russian pogroms, or the Nazi Holocaust.’ But he also commented that, on the other hand, there was nothing in the history of Jews under Islam “to compare with the progressive emancipation and acceptance accorded to Jews in the democratic West during the last three centuries.” (2)

The fact is that the “democratic West” is under the occupation of the Jews. Remember pervert Clinton who once said that America has the biggest stick in the world. What he did not tell is that this biggest stick is in the hands of the Jews with which they rule the ‘democratic West’ and the world. Note the occupation of the Muslim Palestine by the ‘democratic Britain’ in World War 1 for the plantation of the European Jews. Note the creation of a Jewish State in 1948 with the help of ‘democratic America,’ ‘democratic Britain,’ and ‘democratic France.’ Note the maintenance of the Jewish occupation of the Muslim Palestine by the ‘democratic America.’  Every anti-occupation force in the Muslim World is destroyed or contained by the democratic West that is headed by America. Where is Egypt of Nasir? Where is revolutionary Iraq of 1958? Anti-occupation Syria, Lebanon, Sudan, and Iran are paying the price for not accepting the European Jewish occupation of Muslim Palestine.

Every anti-occupation voice is silenced and demonized. Those who dared to challenge the European Jewish occupation are labeled as terrorists.   Muslim leadership is bought, eliminated, or contained.
 
Proof No. 1.

a. Indonesian freedom fighters have been silenced.
“On 7 August 2003, Amrozi bin Nurhasin, of the ‘Bali bombers’ entered a courtroom in Bali, Indonesia. He was appearing for sentencing, having been found guilty of causing deaths of more than two hundred people, none of them Jews. With the world’s media attention focused on him, in front of the judges and the cameras, he shouted in Arabic: Jew: remember Khaibar. The army of Mohammed is coming back to defeat you. 1375 years before this outburst in court, the Prophet Mohammed, leader of the new faith of Islam, achieved one of his first military victories. It was victory, in the year 628, against a Jewish tribe living in the oasis of Khaibar, in the Arabian Peninsula. Historical Arab sources report that between six and nine hundred Jews were killed in the battle. The few Jews who remember this defeat today, do so when recalling what is for them their distant history. But for some Muslims, the battle at Khaibar resonates with meaning even today, as Amrozi bin Nurhasin made clear. (3)

b. Great son of the Muslim World … Mahathir Mohammad. Is there any one left in the Muslim World who can dare to inaugurate an anti-Jewish Day? And world remember how the ‘democratic West’ under the occupation of Jews was after the blood of Prime Minister Mahathir Mohammad.

“On 16 October 2003, two months
after the sentencing in Bali, a similar hope was expressed by the Malaysian Prime Minister, Mahathir Mohammad. The Prime Minister – who in 1986 had inaugurated an ‘anti-Jews Day’ – told the Tenth Islamic Summit Conference that ‘1.3 billion Muslim cannot be defeated by a few million Jews …Surely the twenty-three years’ struggle of the prophet can provide us with some guidance as to what we can and should do. (4)

c. World knows what price occupied Palestinians have been paying for electing an anti-occupation Hamas.

“Within three years, on 25 January 2006, the same sentiment received a boost on the West Bank and in Gaza, when Palestinian Arab voters cast a majority of their votes to Hamas, the Islamic Resistance Movement  (Hamas received forty-four per cent of the vote, as against forty-one percent for their nearest rival, Fatah.) The Hamas Charter, promulgated in 1988, looks forward to the implementation of ‘Allah’s promise’ however long it might take. It reads: ‘The prophet, prayer and peace be upon him, said: The Day of Judgment will not come about until Moslems fight the Jews (killing the Jews), when the Jews hide behind stones and trees. The stones and trees will say, ‘O Moslems, O Abdullah, there is a Jew behind me, come and kill him. (5)

d. These are not the voices of Amrozi bin Nurhasin, Mahathir Mohammad, or Hamas that are determined to stand against the occupation of Muslim Palestine. Palestinians under occupation are also paying the
price for their anti-occupation aspirations.

“The modern resonance of Khaibar has often echoed with hostile attitude towards the Jewish State of Israel. The historian Gideon Kressel witnessed this first-hand in Israel in the autumn of 1989, when a group of Bedouin explained to him over breakfast, ‘in a calm and friendly manner,’ that Israel would soon cease to exist; it was because ‘that is God’s will – nothing can change it. The Bedouin also told Kressel that the Battle of Khaibar was frequent talking point among them, as a result of radio broadcasts from Egypt, Jordan and Saudi Arabia.  During the course of his work among the Bedouin, Kressel often heard words similar to those later used by Amrozi in the Bali courtroom. ‘Khaybar-Khaybar ya Yahud, Jaysh Muhammad sa Ya’ud. (Khaybar-Khaybar you Jews, Mohammed’army is about to return) (6)

Be honest and tell the truth. Jews have never forgotten what Christians have been doing to the Jews before Jews occupied the Christian World three centuries ago. Jewish Bernard Lewis calls this occupation “progressive emancipation and acceptance accorded to Jews in the democratic West during the last three centuries.”

Jews also have never forgotten what Muslim did to Jews in the war of Khaibar.

“1,375 years before this outburst in court, the Prophet Mohammed, leader of the new faith of Islam, achieved one of his first military victories. It was victory, in the year 628, against a Jewish tribe living in the oasis of Khaibar, in the Arabian Peninsula. Historical Arab sources report that between six and nine hundred Jews were killed in the battle. The few Jews who remember this defeat today, do so when recalling what is for them their distant history. But for some Muslims, the battle at Khaibar resonates with meaning even today, as Amrozi bin Nurhasin made clear. (7)

Mayor of Jewishstan (New York City), Ed Koch, once said, “Jews have a long memory.” He was reminding Rev. Jesse Jackson of calling New York a “Hemi Town.”

To punish the Christians according to Jewish Bible, the Jews pitched Christians against Christians. Glaring examples are First World War and Second World War. First World War cost Christians about 13 millions Christians. Second World War cost Christians about seventy millions Christians.
 
After the Cold War, Jews pitched the Christian World against the Muslim World. Both are murdering each other and Jews are enjoying.

Destruction of Christian and Muslim Worlds is the ultimate goal of the Jews. Therefore, they are winning. And this is what the Jewish bible says. When Jews could kill with their own hands, they did not hesitate. They butchered the Canaanites with their own hands. They occupied their land.  Now they are killing the Palestinians with their own hand. And when they could not kill with their own hands, they hired Christians to murder Christians and Muslims.

“Israelites are commanded to murder all the people of the land where they intend to live, and to kill all the people of foreign nations that do not submit themselves in slavery.” (RSV) Deuteronomy 20:10-18. David Duke, (2003). Jewish Supremacism. Free speech Press. P.18)

Note: The main objective of the websites is to provide the visitors with proofs. Please quote the following websites whenever you quote any proof from these websites.
1.muslimmediany.org
2. muslimdailyny.org
3. jewishleadershipwatchny.org
4.hinduleadershipwatchny.org 

/////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////
A Jew is a Jew: Tries to mislead Second and Third caliphs

(What a Jew was doing in the courts of Caliphs Omar and Osman?)

Poasted: 06/18/2011 

Highlights

 

-         Converted Jew attempts to mislead the Second Caliph:  You wish to resemble Judaism – Omar is said to have told Ka ‘b – but we Muslims have been commanded to pray only in the direction of  Ka ‘bah – that is, towards Mecca… In Ismael’s House

-         Converted Jew attempts to mislead the Third Caliph:  Ka ‘b was asked by Othman if a ruler is permitted to take money from the treasury when he is in need, and then to pay it back later. When Ka ‘b said it was permitted, Abu Dharr rebuked Ka ‘b with the words: ‘You son of Jews want to teach us. In Ismael’s House

-         Never forget the fact that a Jew and a proud Zionist author the book “In Ismael’s House.” He is Martin Gilbert

 

Jafar Syed

M.A. LL.B.

Researcher – International Affairs

New York

 

A Jew is a Jew. It does not matter that he converts to Christianity or Islam. It does not matter that adverse circumstances force him to convert or some other motives force him to convert to Christianity or Islam. A Jew converts only to further the Jewish agenda. Note the conversion of Jews after the occupation of Muslim Spain by the Christian Crusaders. One of them is Christopher Columbus. He was not Columbus. He was Christopher Colon.  What he could not achieve as a Jew, he achieved as a converted Jew. The same ruing dynasty who wanted to eliminate Jews from the face of the earth, the same dynasty sponsored him to find the “New World.” He wanted a homeland for the Jews in the “New World” on the expanse of his Christian masters.

 

Take another converted Jewish Senator Kerry. He is not Kerry; he is Kohn.

 

The same is true about Ka ‘b al Abhar. He was a secret Jew and was the advisor of Second and Third caliphs. If he did not pretend as a Muslim, he would never be an advisor to caliphs. 

 

On two occasions, secret Jew Ka ‘b tried to misled Second and Third caliphs.

 

First time, Ka ‘b tried to mislead the first Caliph when Palestine was liberated from the Frangis, (European Whites) in 638.

 

“One of the men who entered Jerusalem with him in 638 was a Jewish convert to Islam, Ka ‘b al-Ahbar.  At Omar’s request, Ka ‘b pointed out the rock were the Jewish Temple had been built by Solomon, King of the Israelites, more than 1,500 years earlier. When Ka ‘b tried to persuade Omar to build Mosque of Omar of north of the holy rock, rather than on the spot where the Temple had stood, he was accused of Judaising tendencies. ‘You wish to resemble Judaism’ – Omar is said to have told Ka ‘b – ‘but we Muslims have been commanded to pray only in the direction of Ka ‘bah – that is, towards Mecca. (1)

 

Second time, Ka 'b betrayed the trust of third Caliph, Osman, by giving him a wrong advice.

 

 “After Omar’s death, Ka ‘b stayed on at the court of the third Caliph, Othman (644-656), where his dispute with Muslim religious scholar Abu Dharr, and the latter’s rebukes of Ka ‘b advice to the Caliph contributed to Ka ‘b’s portrayal by early Muslims writers as ‘the prototype of Jewish opportunism.” (2)

“Ka ‘b was asked by Othman if a ruler is permitted to take money from the treasury when he is in need, and then to pay it back later. When Ka ‘b said it was permitted, Abu Dharr rebuked Ka ‘b with the words: ‘you son of Jews want to teach us.’ (3)

 

Book demonstrates other facts. But remember that a Jew and proud Zionist authored the book.

 

Betrayal, disloyalty, and opportunism are the names of the Jews. It was not only secret Jew Ka ‘b who betrayed the trust of Second and Third Caliph, Jews as a community also betrayed the trust of the Christians who were the rulers of Jerusalem. They changed their loyalties, when they saw that Muslim were the winning party.  

 

“On his way to Jerusalem from the north, Omar conquered several Byzantine-ruled-cities, including Homas, Damascus, and Tiberias. In Homas, the Jew openly aided the Muslim conqueror in the hope of being freed from Christians’ oppression. Jewish soldiers fought in the Muslim ranks as volunteers, while other Jews acted as guides or provided food and provisions for the Muslim armies.(4)

 

How Christians treat Jew? Sick of Jewish mischievous character, Roman purged the Jews from Jerusalem … ethnically cleansed the city from Jews. To protect Jerusalem from the plague of Jews in future, they decreed that a Jew to be hanged if he was founded in Jerusalem. Romans continued the death penalty even after their conversion to Christianity. Byzantines did not annul the law. The situation changed when Muslim liberated Jerusalem from the Byzantine Christians.

 

Proof

 

“In 638, under the direction of the second Caliph, Omar ibn al-khattab, Mohammed’s second father-in-law, the forces of Islam drew near to Jerusalem. The city was then under the rule of Christian Byzantium. Following the victory of the Byzantines over the Persians ten year earlier, Jews had not been allowed to live in Jerusalem, or at least not to spend the night there.” (5)

 

How Muslims treats the Jews? After the liberation of Jerusalem from the Byzantines, Muslims lifted the ban which was imposed by the pagan Romans and continued by the Christian Romans on the Jews to be found in Jerusalem. Christians opposed this gesture by the Muslims.  Jews requested that two hundred families to be allowed to live in Jerusalem. Christians did not want even one Jew to be in Jerusalem. Muslims allowed seventy families to live in Jerusalem.

 

This was not the only act of kindness from the Muslims to the Jews. When Muslims liberated Babylonia, they were again kind to Jews. The same kindness was displayed by the Muslims to the Jews when Iran became the part of the Muslim Millat.

 

“When a Christian deputation from Jerusalem travelled to see Omar in the Hauran – today’s Golan Heights – a treaty was drawn up, under which the Christian citizens of Jerusalem guaranteed security of life and property. After the treaty had been drawn up, Omar made his way to Jerusalem. Upon arrival, he received the keys to the city from the Christian Patriarch.

 

“The Jews asked Omar for permission for two hundred Jewish families to live in the city. Because the Christian patriarch vehemently opposed this, Omar fixed the number at seventy families.

Omar’s concession at Jerusalem led the Jews to regard him as sympathetic to Jewish needs. According to one tradition, the Caliph’s humane attitude towards non-Muslims inspired Jews to grant him the epithet al-Faruq (he who can distinguish truth from falsehood).  He was even praised as a ‘friend of Israel’ in a Midrash – a compilation of Jewish teaching based on the Hebrew Bible. Other Jewish sources lent further credence to this image. They related that when Omar conquered Babylonia, he allowed the leader of the Jewish community there, Bustanai ben Haninai, to retain his role as the Exilarch – ‘head of the Captivity.’  After conquering Persia, Omar gave Bustania a wife of Izdundad, the daughter of Chosroes 11, the King of Persia.” (7)

 

Proofs of death penalty

 

1. Death penalty imposed by Pagan Roman on Jews.  

To punish the Jews for the war, the Romans imposed a fiscus Judaicus (Jewish tax) and confiscated Jewish land in Judea. Roman rule over Judea remained stable for almost a century. Under the rule of Emperor Hadrian, however, Jerusalem was transformed into a Roman colony called Aelia Capitolina, and Jews were barred, on penalty of death, from entering the city. In 130 C.E., Hadrian minted a series of bronze coins to commemorate the refounding of Jerusalem as a Roman colony. Symbolizing the beginning of a new Jerusalem, Hadrian is shown plowing the land with a bull and a cow.  (8)  

2. In 627 Heraclius, Emperor of Byzantium, invaded Persia, defeated Chosroes 11, recovered the True Cross and recaptured Jerusalem where he restored the decrees of Hadrian and Constantine which forbade the Jews to enter Jerusalem. The return of Jerusalem under Christian rule was, however, of short duration because ten years later the city was capture by the Moslim Arabs. (9)

 

Lesson learnt.

Never allow any Jew or converted Jew to be your advisor. Note when a Muslim country does business with a Jew.

JERUSALEM - Did the former head of the Mossad use third-party flagged freighters owned by a powerful Israeli business magnate to ferry top secret IDF reconnaissance teams into Iran for a possible strike on Iran's nuclear facilities?According to a report in the Sunday Times of London, cargo ships owned by the Ofer Brothers shipping group may have been used by the Mossad and IDF to quietly transport Mossad hit squads, as well as IDF commando units, into several key Iranian ports.” (Steve K. Walz, Jewish Press Israel Correspondent, Ofer Brothers And Iran: The Mystery Deepens, June 7, 2011. 

Notes:

1. Martin Gilbert, In Ishmael’s House. 2010. Yale University Press. New Haven and London 

2. Ibid p. 29-30

3. Ibid p. 30

4. Ibid p. 27

5. Ibid p. 27

6. Ibid p. 27- 28

7. Ibid p. 28-30

8. Jewish History.com

9. Henry Cattan, Jerusalem, Groom Helm London (1981) P. 25.


Titus became the Emperor of the Roman Empire upon the death of his father Vespasian in 79 C.E. Titus died shortly after taking power in 81 C.E. and his brother Domitian rose to take his place. In 85 C.E., Domitian erected the Arch of Titus as both a memorial to his brother and as a reminder of the defeat of the First Jewish Revolt (Jewishhistory.com).

 Note: The main objective of the websites is to provide the visitors with proofs. Please quote the following websites whenever you quote any proof from these websites.1.muslimmediany.org2. muslimdailyny.org3. jewishleadershipwatchny.org4.hinduleadershipwatchny.org   //////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////
Jewish Berry Obama fools the Muslim World again
(Jewish Berry Obama is the hired-pimp of the Jewish terrorists and tyrants) Posted: 06/10/2011
Highlights
- Another lollypop to fool an occupied nation – 1967 lines: We believe the borders of Israel and Palestine should be based on the 1967 lines with mutually agreed swaps, so that secure and recognized border are established for both states, declared Jewish Berry Obama on May 19, 2011
- False savior: By mentioning “1967 line,” President Obama  wants to be remembered in history as the champion of Palestinian cause who dared to define the borders of Palestinian state first time
- In fact, the slogan of “1967 line” is coined to fool the Muslim World again. It was a well-calculated phrase for achieving desired results. It gave the Jewish-hired media to portray anti-Muslim Jewish Berry Obama as anti-Jewish. This portrayal makes him credible in the Muslim World.  Credibility factor helps the President to drag the Palestinians to sit with the European Jewish occupiers again.  Always remember that US presidents have been using the slogan of “peace” to fool the Muslim World since the occupation of Muslim Palestine by the European Jews in 1948. In fact, every US president played the peace card to give the European Jewish occupiers time to establish ground realities and to divide the Muslim World between pro-peace and rejectionist camps
- Read between the lines and ignore the “1967 lines.”  It will help the Muslim World where President Obama stands on the question of European Jewish occupation of Muslim Palestinians. He even does not want that European Jewish occupiers be criticized. 
- Jewish Berry Obama’s speech is posted for proving that he is the hired pimp of the Jewish terrorists and tyrants.
- Americans are the worst crusaders since the first crusade that was launched in 1099
- 1095. Crusader Pope Urban 2 chose “chosen French” to destroy the Muslim World.
- Oh, race of Franks, race from across the mountains, race beloved and chosen by God …  Crusader Pope Urban Two
-  Crusader John Adam wants Jews in “Judea.” He wants one hundred Jews to occupy Syria
- Crusader Roosevelt would put a barbed wire around Palestine
- For Crusader Carter the first prerequisite of a lasting peace is the recognition of Israel by her neighbors, Israel's right to exist, Israel's right to exist permanently, Israel's right to exist in peace
- If occupied Palestinians continue their armed resistance, European Jews will be eliminated like Crusaders.
- Camp David Accords were betrayal. Madrid Conference was a betrayal. Yasir’s shaking hand with the occupier was a betrayal.
- Muslim World, stands firm. History is on your side because you are on the right side of history
- Gilbert describes himself as a proud practising Jew and a Zionist
- Martin Gilbert  is again dishonest when he claims that Muslim-Jewish relationship has been marked by mutual tolerance, respect, and partnership

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Jafar Syed
M.A. LL.B.
Researcher – International Affairs
New York

Only a pervert like Jewish Berry Obama can label the European Jewish occupation of Muslim Palestine as a conflict “between Israelis and Arabs.” He is again wrong when he says that “conflict” between “Israelis and Arabs casts a shadow over the region.” It is not the conflict which casts shadow over the region; it is the European Jewish occupation which casts shadow over the region. In addition, anti-Muslim Americans’ support of European Jewish occupation also casts a shadow over the region.

Jewish-hired Jewish Berry Obama again proves his perversion by stating that children of European Jewish occupiers have been living in fear and the children of occupied nation have been indoctrinated to hate the European Jewish occupiers. Mr. President, how many Jewish children have been blown up by the members of the occupied nation, Palestinians?  And how many children of occupied nations have been the victims of the European Jewish occupiers?  Mr. President, what do you expect from an occupied nation to hate its occupiers or love them?
Jewish Berry Obama also blames that “Palestinians have walked away from talks.” There should be some reasons for walking away from talks.
And then Jewish Berry Obama shows his real colors. He threatens the occupied nation:

“For the Palestinians, efforts to delegitimize Israel will end in failure.  Symbolic actions to isolate Israel at the United Nations in September won’t create an independent state. Palestinian leaders will not achieve peace or prosperity if Hamas insists on a path of terror and rejection.  And Palestinians will never realize their independence by denying the right of Israel to exist.” (1)

He reminds the occupied Palestinians:

“As for Israel, our friendship is rooted deeply in a shared history and shared values.  Our commitment to Israel’s security is unshakeable.  And we will stand against attempts to single it out for criticism in international forums.” (2)
Muslims World, this is the real Barak Hussain Obama. He will not even tolerate the criticism of ‘Israel.’
When the Muslim World will realize that Americans are the worst crusaders since the first crusade that was launched in 1099.  In 1095, Christian God through Pope Urban Two chose French, the chosen people, for the liberation of Jerusalem from the Muslims.
In 1095, Pope Urban Two chose “chosen French” to destroy the Muslim World.

“In the year of our Lord's Incarnation one thousand and ninety-five, a great council was celebrated within the bounds of Gaul, in Auvergne, in the city which is called Clermont. Over this Pope Urban II presided, with the Roman bishops and cardinals. This council was a famous one on account of the concourse of both French and German bishops, and of princes as well. Having arranged the matters relating to the Church, the lord pope went forth into a certain spacious plain, for no building was large enough to hold all the people. The pope-then, with sweet and persuasive eloquence, addressed those present in words something like the following, saying:
"Oh, race of Franks, race from across the mountains, race beloved and chosen by God, - as is clear from many of your works,- set apart from all other nations by the situation of your country as well as by your Catholic faith and the honor which you render to the holy Church: to you our discourse is addressed, and for you our exhortations are intended. We wish you to know what a grievous cause has led us to your country, for it is the imminent peril threatening you and all the faithful which has brought us hither.
“From the confines of Jerusalem and from the city of Constantinople a grievous report has gone forth and has -repeatedly been brought to our ears; namely, that a race from the kingdom of the Persians, an accursed race, a race wholly alienated from God, `a generation that set not their heart aright and whose spirit was not steadfast with God,' violently invaded the lands of those Christians and has depopulated them by pillage and fire. They have led away apart of the captives into their own country, and a part have they have killed by cruel tortures. They have either destroyed the churches of God or appropriated them for the rites of their own religion. They destroy the altars, after having defiled them with their uncleanness....The kingdom of the Greeks is now dismembered by them and has been deprived of territory so vast in extent that it could be traversed in two months' time.
"On whom, therefore, is the labor of avenging these wrongs and of recovering this territory incumbent, if not upon you, you upon whom, above all other nations, God has conferred remarkable glory in arms, great courage, bodily activity, and strength to humble the heads of those who resist you ? Let the deeds of your ancestors encourage you and incite your minds to manly achievements:-the greatness of King Charlemagne, and of his son Louis, and of your other monarchs, who have destroyed the kingdoms of the Turks and have extended the sway of Church over lands previously possessed by the pagan. Let the holy sepulcher of our Lord and Saviour, which is possessed by unclean nations, especially arouse you, and the holy places which are now treated, with ignominy and irreverently polluted with the filth of the unclean. Oh, most valiant soldiers and descendants of invincible ancestors, do not degenerate; our progenitors., but recall the valor of your progenitors.
"But if you are hindered by love of children, parents, or of wife, remember what the Lord says in the Gospel, `He that loveth father or mother more than me is not worthy of me', 'Every one that hath forsaken houses, or brethren, or sisters, or father, or mother, or wife, or children, or lands, for my name's sake, shall receive an hundredfold, and shall inherit everlasting life.' Let none of your possessions retain you, nor solicitude for you, family affairs. For this land which you inhabit, shut in on all sides by the seas and surrounded by the mountain peaks, is too narrow for your large population; nor does it abound in wealth; and it furnishes scarcely food enough for its cultivators. Hence it is that you murder and devour one another, that you wage war, and that very many among you perish in intestine strife. (3)

Forget Pope Urban Two. Note the proof of enmity of the American crusaders against the Muslim World.   Note what Second President John Adam is saying:   He wants Jews in “Judea.”

“Your nation [Jewish] may be admitted to all the privileges of citizen in every country of the world. This country has done much. I wish it may do more, and annul every narrow idea in religion, government and commerce. For I really wish the Jews again in Judea an independent nation. Once restored to an independent government and no longer persecuted they would soon wear away some of the asperities and peculiarities of their character, possibly in time become liberal Unitarian Christian.” (4)

“If I were to let my imagination loose, I could find it in my heart to wish that you [Jew Noah, Mordecai Manuel, sheriff of New York, who has the authority to hang Christians] had been at the head of a hundred thousand Israelites and marching with them into Judea and making a conquest of that country and restoring your nation. (5)
Note what Crusader Roosevelt wants to do to the Palestinians.
“What I think I will do is this. First, I would call Palestine a religious country. Then I would leave Jerusalem the way it is and have it run by the Orthodox Greek Catholic Church, the Protestants, and the Jews – have a joint committee run it…. I actually would put a barbed wire around Palestine, and I would begin to the Arab out. … I would provide land for the Arabs in some other parts of the Middle East. … Each time we move out an Arab we would bring in another Jewish family. … But I don’t want to bring in more than they can economically support … It would be an independent nation just like any other nation…. Naturally, if there are 90% Jews, the Jews would dominate the government. … There are lots of places to which you could move the Arabs. All you have to do is drill a well, because there is this large underground water supply, and we can move the Arabs to places where they can really live. (6)

As far ‘peace’ is concerned, note what is the  meaning of “peace” in the vocabulary of the Crusader Carter.

“So, the first prerequisite of a lasting peace is the recognition of Israel by her neighbors, Israel's right to exist, Israel's right to exist permanently, Israel's right to exist in peace. That means that over a period of months or years that the borders between Israel and Syria, Israel and Lebanon, Israel and Jordan, Israel and Egypt must be opened up to travel, to tourism, to cultural exchange, to trade, so that no matter who the leaders might be in those countries, the people themselves will have formed a mutual understanding and comprehension and a sense of a common purpose to avoid the repetitious wars and death that have afflicted that region so long. That's the first prerequisite of peace.” (7)

And note how the European Jewish occupiers benefited from the “peace” signed by the traitor Sadat. This “peace” humiliated the brave Egyptians who were ready to sacrifice every thing to free their Palestinians brothers from the clutches of European Jewish occupiers, eliminating the so-called “Israel” from the map of the earth. If “Israel” exists today, it is the direct result of that so-called “peace.”

“It was the first time that the vast stretch of territory from the headwaters of the Jordan to the sources of the Nile had become an area of peace; that the only land link between Africa and Asia – the Sinai desert, so long a barrier – had  been transformed into a bridge; that Cairo became the nearest capital accessible to Jerusalem. It was the first time that Israel had breached the wall of regional segregation and  attained Arab recognition of its sovereign legitimacy; and the first time that the cry of battlefield had given to the vow of ‘no more war.’
“The solemn pledge, pronounced in Jerusalem by President of Egypt and the Prime Minister of Israel, became the foundation of the first edifice of Arab-Israel peace. It is now a commitment by the people of Egypt and Israel from which they cannot retreat, because the road of return would lead them into the abyss. (8)

Red alert: The moment Palestinians will sign a peace treaty with European Jewish occupiers, Palestinians will legitimize the occupation. It will betray the sacrifices of the millions of Palestinians who resisted and fought against the occupation of European Jews.

Why the occupiers insist for the consent of the occupied? It serves the interests of the occupier.

If occupied Palestinians continue their armed resistance, European Jews like the European Crusaders will be eliminated. This is the verdict of history. Even to talk about peace give legitimacy to an occupier. Camp David Accords were betrayal. Madrid Conference was a betrayal. Yasir’s shaking hand with the occupier was a betrayal.
Muslim World, stands firm. History is on your side because you are on the right side of history. It is better to live under occupation than to legitimize the occupation. It will perpetuate the occupier. It is a surrender. That is what the occupier wants.

Note the nature of the peace trap for 21st Century.

“This book (In Ismael’s House) is dedicated to the 13 million Jews and the 1, 300 million Muslims in the world in the hope that may renew in the Twenty-First Century the mutual tolerance, respect and partnership that marked many periods in their history.” (9)

Note how Martin Gilbert, author of the “In Ismael’s House,” wants to trap the  Muslims under the banner of tolerance, respect and partnership. The same trap of legitimization – end of resistance.
Who is Martin Gilbert? He describes himself as a proud practising  Jew and a Zionist (10)

Martin Gilbert, European Jewish occupiers must live under the occupation of Palestinians for six decades, get the same treatment and humiliation that Palestinians got from them for six decades and then leave the Palestine apologizing for the illegitimate occupation. Then and only then 1,300 million Muslims in the world will think of treating European Jews with tolerance and respect.

Author of the book is again dishonest when he claims that Muslim-Jewish relationship has been marked by mutual tolerance, respect, and partnership. For centuries, Jews were  persecuted for their treacherous role in the Christian World. To escape persecution, they found shelter in the Muslim World. When they were able to pervert the Christian World and were able to manipulate its leadership, they became the ally of the Christian World and worst enemy of the Muslim World. Remember, their anti-Muslim role in World War 1 and World War 2. 


Text of the Jewish Berry Obama speech is given for proving that he is the hired pimp of the Jewish terrorists and tyrants.
“For decades, the conflict between Israelis and Arabs has cast a shadow over the region.  For Israelis, it has meant living with the fear that their children could be blown up on a bus or by rockets fired at their homes, as well as the pain of knowing that other children in the region are taught to hate them.  For Palestinians, it has meant suffering the humiliation of occupation, and never living in a nation of their own.  Moreover, this conflict has come with a larger cost to the Middle East, as it impedes partnerships that could bring greater security and prosperity and empowerment to ordinary people.
“For over two years, my administration has worked with the parties and the international community to end this conflict, building on decades of work by previous administrations.  Yet expectations have gone unmet.  Israeli settlement activity continues.  Palestinians have walked away from talks.  The world looks at a conflict that has grinded on and on and on, and sees nothing but stalemate.  Indeed, there are those who argue that with all the change and uncertainty in the region, it is simply not possible to move forward now.
“I disagree.  At a time when the people of the Middle East and North Africa are casting off the burdens of the past, the drive for a lasting peace that ends the conflict and resolves all claims is more urgent than ever. That’s certainly true for the two parties involved.
“For the Palestinians, efforts to delegitimize Israel will end in failure.  Symbolic actions to isolate Israel at the United Nations in September won’t create an independent state. Palestinian leaders will not achieve peace or prosperity if Hamas insists on a path of terror and rejection.  And Palestinians will never realize their independence by denying the right of Israel to exist.
“As for Israel, our friendship is rooted deeply in a shared history and shared values.  Our commitment to Israel’s security is unshakeable.  And we will stand against attempts to single it out for criticism in international forums.  But precisely because of our friendship, it’s important that we tell the truth:  The status quo is unsustainable, and Israel too must act boldly to advance a lasting peace.
“The fact is, a growing number of Palestinians live west of the Jordan River.  Technology will make it harder for Israel to defend itself.  A region undergoing profound change will lead to populism in which millions of people -– not just one or two leaders -- must believe peace is possible.  The international community is tired of an endless process that never produces an outcome. The dream of a Jewish and democratic state cannot be fulfilled with permanent occupation.
“Now, ultimately, it is up to the Israelis and Palestinians to take action.  No peace can be imposed upon them -- not by the United States; not by anybody else.  But endless delay won’t make the problem go away.  What America and the international community can do is to state frankly what everyone knows -- a lasting peace will involve two states for two peoples:  Israel as a Jewish state and the homeland for the Jewish people, and the state of Palestine as the homeland for the Palestinian people, each state enjoying self-determination, mutual recognition, and peace.
“So while the core issues of the conflict must be negotiated, the basis of those negotiations is clear:  a viable Palestine, a secure Israel.  The United States believes that negotiations should result in two states, with permanent Palestinian borders with Israel, Jordan, and Egypt, and permanent Israeli borders with Palestine.  We believe the borders of Israel and Palestine should be based on the 1967 lines with mutually agreed swaps, so that secure and recognized borders are established for both states.  The Palestinian people must have the right to govern themselves, and reach their full potential, in a sovereign and contiguous state.
“As for security, every state has the right to self-defense, and Israel must be able to defend itself -– by itself -– against any threat.  Provisions must also be robust enough to prevent a resurgence of terrorism, to stop the infiltration of weapons, and to provide effective border security.  The full and phased withdrawal of Israeli military forces should be coordinated with the assumption of Palestinian security responsibility in a sovereign, non-militarized state.  And the duration of this transition period must be agreed, and the effectiveness of security arrangements must be demonstrated.
“These principles provide a foundation for negotiations.  Palestinians should know the territorial outlines of their state; Israelis should know that their basic security concerns will be met.  I’m aware that these steps alone will not resolve the conflict, because two wrenching and emotional issues will remain:  the future of Jerusalem, and the fate of Palestinian refugees.  But moving forward now on the basis of territory and security provides a foundation to resolve those two issues in a way that is just and fair, and that respects the rights and aspirations of both Israelis and Palestinians.
“Now, let me say this:  Recognizing that negotiations need to begin with the issues of territory and security does not mean that it will be easy to come back to the table.  In particular, the recent announcement of an agreement between Fatah and Hamas raises profound and legitimate questions for Israel:  How can one negotiate with a party that has shown itself unwilling to recognize your right to exist?  And in the weeks and months to come, Palestinian leaders will have to provide a credible answer to that question.  Meanwhile, the United States, our Quartet partners, and the Arab states will need to continue every effort to get beyond the current impasse.
“I recognize how hard this will be.  Suspicion and hostility has been passed on for generations, and at times it has hardened. But I’m convinced that the majority of Israelis and Palestinians would rather look to the future than be trapped in the past.  We see that spirit in the Israeli father whose son was killed by Hamas, who helped start an organization that brought together Israelis and Palestinians who had lost loved ones.  That father said, “I gradually realized that the only hope for progress was to recognize the face of the conflict.”  We see it in the actions of a Palestinian who lost three daughters to Israeli shells in Gaza.  “I have the right to feel angry,” he said.  “So many people were expecting me to hate.  My answer to them is I shall not hate.  Let us hope,” he said, “for tomorrow.”
“That is the choice that must be made -– not simply in the Israeli-Palestinian conflict, but across the entire region -– a choice between hate and hope; between the shackles of the past and the promise of the future.  It’s a choice that must be made by leaders and by the people, and it’s a choice that will define the future of a region that served as the cradle of civilization and a crucible of strife.”

References:
1. Remarks by the President on the Middle East and North Africa, State Department, Washington, DC. May 19, 2011
2. Remarks by the President on the Middle East and North Africa. State Department, Washington, DC. May 19, 2011
3. Part 2. Eleventh Crusader Jewish Berry Obama and dismemberment of Libya,
www.muslimdailyny.org
4.Peter Grose (1983). Israel in the Mind of  America. New York: Schocken Book. P. 6) 
5. Peter Grose (1983). Israel in the Mind of  America. New York: Schocken Book. P. 15)
6. Peter Grose (1983). Israel in the Mind of  America. New York: Schocken Book. P. 140)
7.President Carter, March 16, 1977. 
8.Gideon Rafael, Destination Peace. P. x-x1
9. Martin Gilbert, In Ismael’s House, A History of Jews in Muslim Lands, Yale University press New Haven and London)
10. wikipedia.org/wiki/Martin_Gilbert

Note: The main objective of the websites is to provide the visitors with proofs. Please quote the following websites whenever you quote any proof from these websites. God bless you. Stand against tyrany and injustice.
1.muslimdediany.org
2. muslimdailyny.org
3. jewishleadershipwatchny.org
4.hinduleadershipwatchny.org 
//////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////
Part 1. Anti-Christ Jews destroy Christianity in Christian America
(Jewish-hired Christian prostitutes O’Reilly, Limbough, Hannity, Beck and others dare not say a single word about Jewish anti-Christ and anti-Christian role in America) Posted 05/04/2011. updated 05/05/2011

Highlights:
Jews against Lord of Christians and Christianity.
“Bills providing for reading of Bible in public schools introduced in Ohio Legislature. Ohio Rabbinical Association and Central Conference of American Rabbis oppose bills
“SEPTEMBER 18. Los Angeles, Cal.: Rabbi S. Hecht demands of State Superintendent of Public Instruction that some verses of a sectarian religious character be eliminated from the school readers in use throughout the State” [1]

Out of three hundred million Americans, can any body dare to say word Bible in Public Schools of America? Jewish terror and tyranny have come full circle.

“Albany, N. Y.: State Senate passes bill, 27 to 18, for reading Bible in public schools.
“26.New Jersey: Bill to compel reading of Bible in public schools passes House of Representatives.
“AUGUST 7. At Brown University, Providence, R. I., daily chapel attendance is made compulsory for all students” [1]

One upon a time, Jews were arrested in Hemi Town for not observing the Christian Lord Day.
“AUGUST 20. New York - In Fourth District Police Court, Abr. L. Saruya, electrician, arrested for violating Sunday Law, discharged because he observes Jewish Sabbath” [1]

When Jews were intolerant about Christian Lord and Christianity, they wanted special status for the followers of Judaism.

“FEBRUARY 12. Albany, N. Y.: State Senator dIrving J. Joseph introduces bill to permit those who observe Saturday as the Sabbath Day to work on Sunday
“FACILITIES FOR JEWISH RELIGIOUS OBSERVANCE:—
NOVEMBER 20. Chicago, 111.: Board of Education adopts following rule: "No deduction shall be made from the salary of a teacher of that Jewish faith who may be absent on any day which the Governor of the State of Illinois proclaims a religious holiday for
those of the Jewish faith [1]
1. Source of quotations. American Jewish Year Book, Volume 17, 1915- 16.

Jafar Syed
Researcher – International Affairs
M.A. LL.B.
New York
 
Hanging of Christian Lord was not enough for the anti-Christ and anti-Christianity Jews. They were persistent to demonize the Christian Lord and to pervert Christianity all over the world with whatever tools they have at their disposals. In America, they became the champion of secularism and separation of state and church. Why? Living in the Christian Word, Jew knew that unless the Christian Lord was demonized and Christianity was perverted, they could not write the final chapter of the book, which started with the hanging of the Christian Lord. How much are they successful in demonizing the Christian Lord and perversion of Christianity? Gauge their success only from one fact.   Andrew Cuomo and Jewish Berry Obama both are for the legal rights of pervert homosexuals. Bottom line is that Jews in America never allowed the Christians to have a Christian country; Jewish question was always there. And Muslim of the world, go on the red alert. You also have been also on the Jewish target list.  

1914. Proof of Jews anti-Christianity role in America. Posted document proves the following facts.

A. Special Status for Jews, chosen people. 
Jews have been successful in some states and institutions to grab special status for Jews. 1. Jewish students were exempted from Christmas exercises 2. Jews were allowed to work on Sunday 3. Jewish employees were entitled to full-day pay if they did not work on Jewish holiday 4. Courts uphold the authority of rabbis (Jewish priest) 5. Special safety for Kosher
 
B. Christians struggle to preserve the Christian charter of the society 
Christians were struggling to keep the Christian religion alive. They were mandating the compulsory chapel attendance, devoting of half a day week for religion teaching of the students by the teacher of their own faith, police arresting the Jews for violating the Sunday Law and not permitting concerts on Sunday.

Document from American Jewish Year Book.

“GENERAL EVENTS OF INTEREST TO JEWS

“BIBLE IN SCHOOLS:—DECEMBER 29. Nashville, Tenn., Board of Education decides to compel the reading by teachers of a chapter of the Bible every morning in every "room and hall" of
every public school in the city.—JANUARY 25. Nashville, Tenn.: State Senator Ike Stevens of Dyer County introduces bill providing for daily reading of Bible in public schools.—MARCH 22. Louisiana Supreme Court decides that ordinance making compulsory reading of Bible in public schools of Caddo Parish is unconstitutional.— 25. Bills providing for reading of Bible in public schools introduced in Ohio Legislature. Ohio Rabbinical Association and Central Conference of American Rabbis oppose bills.—APRIL 5. In Vermont Legislature, bill for reading Bible in public schools defeated.—8. Caddo, Louisiana, Board of School Directors decide against Bible reading in public schools of parish.—Cincinnati, O.: Union Board of High Schools go on record as opposed to reading of Bible in public schools.—16. Lansing, Mich.: Senate rejects bill requiring reading of Bible in public schools of the State.—21. Albany, N. Y.: State Senate passes bill, 27 to 18, for reading Bible in public schools.—26. Albany, N. Y.: Bill providing for reading of Bible in public schools defeated.—New Jersey: Bill to compel reading of Bible in public schools passes House of Representatives.—MAY 3. Ohio: Consideration of the Totman- Hines Bill (see Mch. 22), compelling reading of Bible in public schools, indefinitely postponed.”

“RELIGIOUS EXERCISES IN SCHOOLS:—AUGUST 7. At Brown University, Providence, R. I., daily chapel attendance is made compulsory for all students.—SEPTEMBER 18. Los Angeles, Cal.: Rabbi S. Hecht demands of State Superintendent of Public Instruction that some verses of a sectarian religious character be eliminated from the school readers in use throughout the State.— NOVEMBER 5. Rochester, N. Y.: Movement instituted in the public schools to devote half a day each week to the teaching of religion, pupils to be taught by teachers of their own faith.—DECEMBER 24.
Boston, Mass.: Jewish children excused from participating in Christmas exercises in public schools.”

“SUNDAY LAWS:—AUGUST 20. New York - In Fourth District Police Court, Abr. L. Saruya, electrician, arrested for violating Sunday Law, discharged because he observes Jewish
Sabbath.—FEBRUARY 12. Albany, N. Y.: State Senator Irving J. Joseph introduces bill to permit those who observe Saturday as the Sabbath Day to work on Sunday.—Brockton, Mass.: Mayor refuses to permit Young Men's Hebrew Association to hold a Sunday concert for benefit of the Jewish war sufferers.—13. Bill introduced in Massachusetts Legislature to permit Jews who observe Saturday as the Sabbath to work on Sunday.”

“FACILITIES FOR JEWISH RELIGIOUS OBSERVANCE:—
NOVEMBER 20. Chicago, 111.: Board of Education adopts following rule: "No deduction shall be made from the salary of a teacher of the Jewish faith who may be absent on any day which the Governor of the State of Illinois proclaims a religious holiday for
those of the Jewish faith."-—DECEMBER 11. Philadelphia, Pa.: Municipal Court, in case of Felsh vs. Tonkin, upholds authority of Rabbis and of the Vaad Ha-Kashruth in libel case.—JANUARY 29. Nathan D. Shapiro, New York Legislature, introduces bill making it a misdemeanor to falsely represent food as Kosher; signed April 10, becoming operative from September 1.”
(Source of the document: American Jewish Year Book, Volume 17, P. 203-204)

Remember one fact. Jews always hire  Christians to serve them. It was true in 1914 and it is true today. Jewish-hired Christian prostitutes O’Reilly, Limbough, Hannity, Beck and others are the living proof who has sold their souls and their Lord to Jewish auctioneers. 
 //////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////
Part 3. Eleventh crusader Jewish Berry Obama and dismemberment of Libya
(It is oil, stupid) 04/16/2011
Highlights
- CIA finances The National Front for the Salvation of Libya (Part 1. Eleventh crusader Jewish Berry Obama and dismemberment of Libya, Libya after Gaddafi, muslimdailyny.org, 03/08/2011)
 -U.S. and Europe should help Libyans to overthrow the regime of Gaddafi … Wall Street Journal
- Corporate media of America spins the wheel of misinformation as usual. This time it again targets a Muslim country, Libya (Part 1. Eleventh crusader Jewish Berry Obama and dismemberment of Libya. Libya after Gaddafi, muslimdailyny.org, 03/08/2011)
- Corporate media of America muffles the fact that America, Europe and European Jewish occupiers of the Muslim Palestine never accepted Col. Gaddafi (Part 1. Eleventh crusader Jewish Berry Obama and dismemberment of Libya, Libya after Gaddafi, muslimdailyny.org, 03/08/2011)
 - The coming days and tomorrow are unpredictable in Libya, the third largest oil producer in Africa, a country whose wealth is now largely falling into the hands of imperialism.
-Why is Gadhafi not acceptable to American elite and the European Jewish occupiers of Muslim Palestine? (Part 1. Eleventh crusader Jewish Berry Obama and dismemberment of Libya,  Libya after Gaddafi, muslimdailyny.org, 03/08/2011)
 -Is it the first time that corporate media of the United States is clearing the way for the slaughter of another nation? (Part 1. Eleventh crusader Jewish Berry Obama and dismemberment of Libya, Libya after Gaddafi muslimdailyny.org, 03/08/2011)
-Every student of history knows the predator history of Great Britain and France. Masses know less what the Americans have been doing since the occupation of America by the British occupiers—later they named themselves   Americans. (Part 1. Eleventh crusader Jewish Berry Obama and dismemberment of Libya, Libya after Gaddafi, muslimdailyny.org, 03/08/2011)
-Note the bloody hands of America since World War 11 to the end of Soviet Union. To maintain the American Empire “called the free world,” Americans butchered 123 million human beings. Two-thirds were non-combatants (Part 1. Eleventh crusader Jewish Berry Obama and dismemberment of Libya, Libya after Gaddafi, muslimdailyny.org, 03/08/2011)
-There is no international law. There is no international community. There is no UN, there is no UN Charter, and there is no NATO. It is only America, headed by eleventh crusader Jewish Berry Obama. (Part 2. Eleventh crusader Jewish Berry Obama and dismemberment of Libya .Destruction of the Muslim World from Pope Urban Two to Jewish Berry Obama muslimdailyny.org 03/20/2011)
-In 1095, it was Pope Urban Two who chose French, chosen people, to destroy the Muslim World. Now Corporate America has chosen Jewish Berry Obama to destroy the Muslim World. Note the dismemberment of Muslim Sudan. Note the “surge” in Afghanistan. And now it is Libya. Do not forget that Jewish Berry Obama is less than two year in power on behalf of the corporate America (Part 2. Eleventh crusader Jewish Berry Obama and dismemberment of Libya. Destruction of the Muslim World from Pope Urban Two to Jewish Berry Obama, muslimdailyny.org 03/20/2011)
-World still remembers the “coalition of the willing” to butcher the Iraqis and occupied Iraq. Now witness the ‘coalition of the top poodle and poodles.’ to butchers the Libyans (Part 2. Eleventh crusader Jewish Berry Obama and dismemberment of Libya
(Destruction of the Muslim World from Pope Urban Two to Jewish Berry Obama Muslimdailyny.org 03/20/2011)
-Jewish Berry Obama violates the UN charter to butcher the Libyans (Part 2. Eleventh crusader Jewish Berry Obama and dismemberment of Libya (Destruction of the Muslim World from Pope Urban Two to Jewish Berry Obama, Muslimdailyny.org 03/20/2011)
-Jewish Berry Obama hires mercenaries to occupy Libya (Part 2. Eleventh crusader Jewish Berry Obama and dismemberment of Libya. Destruction of the Muslim World from Pope Urban Two to Jewish Berry Obama, Muslimdailyny.org 03/20/2011)
-Libyans have the right to defend their country from internal and external threats (Part 2. Eleventh crusader Jewish Berry Obama and dismemberment of Libya. Destruction of the Muslim World from Pope Urban Two to Jewish Berry Obama, Muslimdailyny.org 03/20/2011)
- Oh, race of Franks, race from across the mountains, race beloved and chosen by God … Pope Urban Two (Part 2. Eleventh crusader Jewish Berry Obama and dismemberment of Libya. Destruction of the Muslim World from Pope Urban Two to Jewish Berry Obama, Muslimdailyny.org 03/20/2011)
- Oil predators in Libya: Anglo-Dutch Shell, British Petroleum, U.S. ExxonMobil, Hess Corp., Marathon Oil, Occidental Petroleum and ConocoPhillips, the Spanish Repsol, Germany's Wintershall, Austria's OMV , Norway's Statoil, Eni and Canada's Petro Canada.

- Do not forget the Jewish connection in the destruction of the world. Jewish Ambassador Henry conspired to auction the Muslim Palestinians in 1916-1917

Jafar Syed
M.A., LL.B.
Researcher – International Affairs
New York

World is again blinded by the US corporate media. It is muffling the fact that Libyan destruction is engineered by the CIA on behalf of the Corporate America; Wall Street Journal is demanding the head of Gadaffi on the platter; and Libya is the third largest oil producer in Africa. US corporate media is not telling the world that Americans have murdered more than bloody France and Britain combined and corporate America has chosen Jewish Berry Obama to continue the destruction of the Muslim World like Pope Urban Two who chose “chosen French” to destroy the Muslim World.
Do not forget that white European Jews, occupier of the Muslim Palestine, are the main beneficiary of the destruction of the Muslim World.  

A. It is oil, stupid!
Note the oil predators that are sucking the blood of the Libyans. They are Anglo-Dutch Shell, British Petroleum, U.S. ExxonMobil, Hess Corp., Marathon Oil, Occidental Petroleum and ConocoPhillips, the Spanish Repsol, Germany's Wintershall, Austria's OMV, Norway's Statoil, Eni and Canada's Petro Canada.

“The Libyan leader proposed the nationalisation of U.S. oil companies, as well as those of UK, Germany, Spain, Norway, Canada and Italy in 2009.
“On January 25, 2009, Muammar Al Gaddafi announced that his country was studying the nationalisation of foreign companies due to lower oil prices.
"The oil-exporting countries should opt for nationalisation because of the rapid fall in oil prices. We must put the issue on the table and discuss it seriously," said Gaddafi.
"Oil should be owned by the State at this time, so we could better control prices by the increase or decrease in production," said the Libyan leader. (Translated from the Portuguese version and appended by:
Lisa Karpova, Reason for war? Gaddafi wanted to nationalise oil, Pravda, 25.03.2011)

These statements by Gaddafi have been a nightmare for oil predators in Libya: Anglo-Dutch Shell, British Petroleum, U.S. ExxonMobil, Hess Corp., Marathon Oil, Occidental Petroleum and ConocoPhillips, the Spanish Repsol, Germany's Wintershall, Austria's OMV, Norway's Statoil, Eni and Canada's Petro Canada.”

B. It is Jewish visible hand, stupid!
A Jew is a Jew; it does not matter in which country he lives. Moreover, instead of furthering the interests of United States, he uses his status to further the interests of the Jews. He also establishes connection by using the official position and then cashes them for Jewish cause.
Jewish Henry Morgenthau is one the Jews who is Jews first and America second. He was ambassador to Turkey. He is using his connection to buy Muslim Palestine from the crippled and besieged Turkish government. 
“May 22. Reported by Henry Morgenthau, late ambassador to Turkey, that broached to Turkish Ministry subject of sale to Palestine to the Zionists after the war, and that Turkish Ministers heartily approved the project.” (European War, Jewish Year Book, September 28, 1916 to September 16, 1917, page 210)
Another proof of Ambassador Morgenthau that he was Jew first and American second. Jewish Henry Morgenthau was still the ambassador to Turkey. It demonstrates that how he is serving the interests of the Jews. He cared more for alien Jews in Palestine than the Americans.
“The first call for help came from Palestine. In cablegrams addressed to Messrs. Louis Marshall and Jacob H. Schiff, the Hon. Henry Morgenthau, then ambassador to Turkey, stated that thousands of indigent Jews, heretofore dependent for their subsistence on contributions from Jews in countries that had entered the war, were in great distress, the sum of $50,000 being immediately necessary to save them from actual starvation. Accordingly, at its meeting on August 31, 1914, the Executive Committee of the American Jewish Committee took the first step for the relief Jews in warring countries by voting an appropriation of $25,000, upon the offer of Mr. Schiff to $12, 500 and the assurance that the balance of the $50,000 would be contributed by the provisional Executive Committee for General Zionist Affairs. The money was sent by cable to Mr. Morgenthau, who appointed a committee in Palestine to administer it. (Jewish War Relief Work, American Jewish Year Book,  September 1917 to September 1918)
And dear readers, this was the first installment. Second, $50,000 was a lot of money in 1916-1917. Third, no race has robbed the Christians than the Jews. Jews make money on the expanse of Christians and use this Christian money for the interests of the Jewish cause. With Christian money, they hire the Christian leadership. Ask the incorporated Jewish Berry Obama.  
 //////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////
Part 2. Freedom of expression ends where Jewish nose begins (Jewish terrorists and tyrants hang a Norwegian lawmaker) Posted 04/02/2011

Highlights
- Norwegian lawmaker Anders Mathisen is the recent victim of Jewish worldwide terror and tyranny
- There is no evidence the gas chambers or mass graves existed … Norwegian lawmaker Andres Mathisen
- Public has been brainwashed into believing in the Holocaust by films such as "Schindler's List … Norwegian lawmaker Andres Mathisen
- Jewish-hired whores remind the Norway’s role in Second World War
- Buckling under the pressure of Jewish terror and tyranny, Lawmaker Mathisen’s  party demands his resignation
- The questions before the Jewish-occupied world are very simple. Why do Jews have the exclusive right of freedom of expression? Why can only they even demonize the prophets of Christians and Muslims but nobody has the right to differ with the Jewish version of events?
- Do not forget that the Jewish terrorists’ lynching did not start with Norwegian lawmaker and it will not end with him. It started with the lynching of entire nation of Canaan
- In the United States, the first Christian whom Jews lynched was Dutch governor of New York City. His name is Peter Stuyvesant
- Jews are hateful enemies and blasphemers of the name of Christ,-- be not allowed further to infect and trouble this new colony … Governor Peter Stuyvesant of New York City
- Jews are deceitful race … Governor Peter Stuyvesant of New York City
- Jews are customary usurer … Governor Peter Stuyvesant of New York City
- Why do some human beings dare to challenge the worldwide Jewish terrorism and tyranny? They know that Jewish throat-cutters will cut their throats
- It is a time that there must be a worldwide yearly conference in the United States to discuss the Jewish anti-humanity role and their worldwide terrorist and tyranny  empire

Jafar Syed
M.A., LL.B.
Researcher-International Affairs
New York

Sky fell down. Jewish Telegraph Agency, The Jewish Week, Jewish Journal, Political Forum, The Jewish Chronicle, VosLzNeias, answers.yahoo, Virtual Jerusalem, and J. Post shouted from the rooftops that Norwegian lawmaker denies holocaust. Dozens others also joined the media prostitutes. Why? The Jewish terrorist and tyrannical leadership rewards lynching of any human being who dares to expose the Jewish worldwide terrorism and tyranny. It also rewards the whores like Juan Williams who demonizes the victim of the Jewish worldwide terrorism and tyranny. “Fox News Gives Juan Williams $2 Million Contract.” (David Folkenflik, NPR).

 
This time these media whores are lynching Norwegian lawmaker Anders Mathisen. His crime is that he dares to say, “There is no evidence the gas chambers or mass graves existed. Even reputable Holocaust historians have admitted it cannot be established. Mathisen reportedly has accused Holocaust survivors of exaggerating their stories. He also said that the public has been brainwashed into believing in the Holocaust by films such as "Schindler's List, (Norwegian Lawmaker Denies Holocaust, The Jewish Week, Monday, March 21, 2011)

Lawmaker commits another crime in the eyes of the Jews in addition to the above quoted statements. “Mathisen reportedly has spent months researching World War II concentration camps and is advocating changing history books, according to the Coordination Forum for Countering Anti-Semitism. He also published his reported “findings" on his Facebook page.” (Norwegian Lawmaker Denies Holocaust, the Jewish Week, Monday, March 21, 2011)

 The reaction on these reported comments of lawmaker Mathisen:
"Holocaust survivors are aghast at the morally repugnant comments of a Norwegian member of Parliament," Elan Steinberg, vice president of the American Gathering of Holocaust Survivors and their Descendants, said in a statement. "They are an insult to the memory of all victims of Nazi brutality, Jew and non-Jew."
These Jewish-hired whores reminded the Norway’s role in Second World War.
"It was not until the 1990s that Norway began to confront its collaboration with the deportation of Jews and the plunder of their property during the Nazi occupation. The manner in which they deal with MP Mathisen is a test of whether those historical lessons were learned. (Norwegian Lawmaker Denies Holocaust, The Jewish Week, Monday, March 21, 2011)

Buckling under the pressure of Jewish tyranny, Lawmaker Mathisen’s party demanded his resignation.

The questions before the Jewish-occupied world are very simple. Why do Jews have the exclusive right of freedom of expression? Why can only they even demonize the prophets of Christians and Muslims but nobody has the right to differ with the Jewish version of events?

Do not forget that the Jewish terrorist lynching did not start with Norwegian lawmaker and it will not end with him. It started with the lynching of entire nation of Canaan. It did not end with the lynching of Christian Lord Jesus (peace be upon him) and Muslim prophet Jesus (peace be upon him). In the United States, the first Christian whom Jews lynched was Dutch governor of New York. His name is Peter Stuyvesant. He did not want a single Jew to come to America and live. Was he against the Jews? No. He hated them because of their mischievous and manipulative nature. He could not succeed. Jews prevailed. The company who hired him was in the pocket of Jews.

Note why Governor Peter Stuyvesant did not want even the shadow of Jews on the American soil.

“The Jews who have arrived would nearly all like to remain here, but learning that they (with their customary usury and deceitful trading with the Christians) were very repugnant to the inferior magistrates, as also to the people having the affection for you; The Deaconry also fearing that owing to their present indigence they might become a charge in the coming winter, we have, for the benefit of this weak and newly developing place and land in general, deemed it useful to require them in a friendly way to depart; praying also most seriously in this connection, for ourselves as also for the general community of your worship, that the deceitful race, such hateful enemies and blasphemers of the name of Christ,-- be not allowed further to infect and trouble this new colony, to the detraction of your worship and the dissatisfaction of your worships’ most affectionate subject. (Extract from letter of Peter Stuyvesant to the Amsterdam Chamber of the Dutch West India Company, Manhattan, September 22, 1964, unwelcome, The Jews in the United Stats, A documentary history of the Jews in the United States, Morris Schappers, Third Edition, P. 1-2)

Readers, it was September 1654. Twenty three Jews arrived in New Amsterdam – old name of New York City. Portuguese kicked them from Brazil for siding with the Dutch against the Portuguese. Jews never rest. This is their problem. They always side with somebody against somebody. Read their entire history.
 
Why do some human beings dare to challenge the Jewish worldwide terrorism and Jewish tyranny? They know that Jewish throat-cutters cut their throats. They know that the Jewish worldwide machine of terrorism tyranny will end their careers – it does not matter weather they are politicians, professors or journalists. Every one who dares to raise voice against Jewish worldwide terror and tyranny knows that he will be demonized.

In spite of this realization, some human beings dare to challenge the Jewish worldwide terror and tyranny.
 
It is a time that there must be a worldwide yearly conference in the United States to discuss the Jewish anti-humanity role and their worldwide terrorist empire. Victims of the Jewish worldwide terror and tyranny should be invited and ask them what motivated them to stand against the Jewish worldwide terror and tyranny.
Note: Exclusive purpose of the website is to give the readers proofs from different sources. Please use these proofs repeatedly to educate the masses. Whenever experts are used, please give the reference of muslimdailyny.org. Thank you.    
///////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////
Nuke Israel under international law
(Nuke Iran under international law … Alan Dershowitz) posted 03/29/2011

Highlights
 -Alan Dershowitz is an Israeli first and American second under the Law of Return
- Like every other Jew in America, Alan Dershowitz main job is the destruction of the Muslim World, one country after another.
- Israel is targeting more than sixty cities with its nuke … The Jewish Press
- Does targeting more than sixty cities with nukes by Jewish state justify a nuclear attack by Muslims? Ask Jewish Professor Alan Dershowitz.
- Israel also has 200 atomic mines … The Jewish Press
-Israel activated three times its nukes to destroy Muslim countries … The Jew Press
- The fact is that Israel, under the protective embralla of the United States, does not need international law to attack Iran or any other country. Why? Israel is an international law
-  Does international law warrant occupation of another nation? Does international law allow the massacre of the occupied nation? Does international law deprive an occupied nation the right of self-determination?
- United States will join the Jewish state in a nuclear strike again Iran President Bush

- Jerusalem belongs to the Jewish people and will remain under Israeli sovereignty for eternity … Jewish  Prime Minister Bibi
- Jewish-hired American leadership is ready to nuke every Muslim country to save Israel, the fifty-first state of the United States of America
-Jewish Berry Obama is entirely in the pocket of the Jews. Remember the joint press conference addressed by Obama and Bibi in which Obama announced that Jews had the ‘divine right’ to nuke the world. Remember the dismemberment of Sudan on his watch. And now he is conspiring to dismember Libya. It is just a beginning; wait where it ends. Destruction helps the Jews occupation of Muslim Palestine

Jafar Syed
M.A., LL.B.
Researcher – International Affairs
New York

Iran’s recent attempt to ship arms to Hamas in Gaza Strip is an act of war committed by the Iranian government against Israeli government. The Israeli Navy seized the ship, loaded with weapons designed to kill Israeli civilians, and traced the weapons back to Iran.

Nor is this the first act of war that would justify a military response by Israel under international law. Iran has sent other boatloads of anti personnel weapons to Hamas and Hezbollah. In addition, back in 1992, the Iranian leaders planned and authorized a deadly attack on Israeli’s embassy in Argentina. That bombing which was carried out by Iranian agents, constituted a direct armed attack on the sate of Israel, since its embassy is part of its sovereign territory. Moreover, the Iranian government has publically declared war on Israel by calling for it “to be wiped off the map.”

Under international law, these acts of war – known as Casus Belli – fully justify an Israeli armed response, opines Alan Dershowitz. Article was published in Jewish Sentinel, March 23, 2011. Title of the article is Preventive self-defense, Israel has the right to attack Iran’s nuclear reactors now.

Who is this Alan Dershowitz? He is an Israeli first and American second under the Law of Return. He is an Israeli by birth like any other Jew. What is he doing in America?  He is the Fleix Frankfurter Professor of Law a Harvard Law School. Like every other Jew in America, his main job is the destruction of the Muslim World, one country after another.

Does shipping weapons, bombing an embassy, and threatening an occupied power off the map justify an attack? Does targeting more than sixty cities with nukes by Jewish state justify a nuclear attack? Ask Jewish Professor Alan Dershowitz. He must have an answer.

“The book, further reveals that Israel has nuclear warheads aimed at 68-70 different cities in the world, including cities in every Arab country in the Middle East. Israel also has 200 atomic mines – even more than Britain has – located in holes on the Golan Heights. These mines have been prepared to counter a Syrian invasion of the Golan.” (Why is P.M. Rabin Afraid? Israel’s nukes ready for action. Could wipe out all enemy countries, Jewish Press, February 4-10, 1994.

Referenced book by the Jewish Press is Critical Mass.

Jewish Professor of law Alan Dershowitz, does activation of nuclear nukes against other countries allows the targeted country to attack Israel?

“The book states that Israel was on the alert for a possible nuclear attack three times: The first time was 10 days before the Six-Day War when Egyptian MiG21’s managed to launch a reconnaissance flight over the nuclear reactor in Dimona. Israeli conventional missiles in Dimona failed to shoot it down, and the general staff, then headed by Yitzhak Rabin, thought Egypt was planning to bomb the reactor. Consequently, then prime minster Levi Eshkol ordered the activation of two atomic bombs. The bombs were ready the first day of the war.

“The second time that Israel was prepared to use atomic bombs was during the Yom Kippur War, and the third time during the Gulf War.” (Why is P.M. Rabin Afraid? Israel’s nukes ready for action. Could wipe out all enemy countries, Jewish Press, February 4-10, 1994.

The fact is that Israel, under the protective embralla of the United States, does not need international law to attack Iran or any other country. Why? Israel is an international law. Does international law warrant occupation of another nation?  Does international law allow the massacre of the occupied nation? Does international law deprive an occupied nation the right of self-determination?

Note what Baby Bush promise to Netanyahu.

“US President George W. Bush promised Israel’s opposition leader Binyamin Netanyahu that the United States will join the Jewish state in a nuclear strike again Iran, Israel Radio reported today.

“Former Prime Minister Netanyahu, opposition Likud Party’s hard-line chairman who opposes US-baked Annapolis peace process, reiterated to President Bush his stance, that a pre-emptive nuclear strike against Iran’s nuclear installation was the only way to stop the Islamic nation’s nuclear weapons ambition.”

“During their 45-minutes meeting at King David hotel in Jerusalem Netanyahu also told Bush that Jerusalem belongs to the Jewish people and will remain under Israeli sovereignty for eternity.” (Israel’s Netanyahu claims President Bush promised unilateral nuclear Bomb attack against Iran. We’ll nuke Iran – Bush promises Israel. (veteranforcommonsense.Org, January 10, 2008)

Jewish-hired American leadership is ready to nuke every Muslim country to save Israel, the fifty-first state of the United States of America. Even sacred place of Mecca is no exception by the Jewish-hired guns.

“WASHINGTON: A Republican congressman said in a radio interview aired by a Florida station that if a multiple-city attack happened in the United States in the next 90 days, as predicted by an Israeli expert, and was found to be the work of extremist Muslims, then “we should take out their holy sites.” Congressman Thomas G Tancredo, Republican from Colorado, was being interviewed by AM 540 WFLA radio host Pat Campbell, who asked him what the response of the United States should be were terrorist attacks on US cities to take place and were attributable to extremist Muslims. The Congressman replied, “ ... then we could take out their holy sites.” Asked if that meant Mecca, Tancredo answered, “Yes.” khalid hasan. (Democraticsunderground.com, Congressman says bomb Mecca if US attacked)

“In this post I make the case that nuking Mecca would be a rational deterrent to radical Islamists bent on using WMD against American civilians. However, even if there is no deterrent effect, attacking Mecca and wiping out the central locus of  Islamists ritual worship may be in the long-term interests of the US and Occidental world.” (Nuke Mecca and destroy Islam. The case of nuking Mecca, www.truthandgrace.com/muslimnuke, 12/9/2008)

What the Muslim of the world should do? At least, do not think that America is a friend of the Muslim World. It is as anti-Muslim nation as Britain and the France have been and are.

And Jewish Berry Obama is entirely in the pocket of the Jews. Remember the joint press conference addressed by Obama and Bibi in which Obama announced that Jews had the ‘divine right’ to nuke the world. Remember the dismemberment of Sudan on his watch. And now he is conspiring to dismember Libya. It is just a beginning; wait where it ends. Destruction helps the Jews occupation of Muslim Palestine.

Note: Exclusive purpose of the website is to give the readers proofs from different sources. Please use these proofs repeatedly to educate the masses. Whenever experts are used, please give the reference of muslimdailyny.org. Please thank you.    
///////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////
Part 2. Eleventh crusader Jewish Berry Obama and dismemberment of
Libya
(Destruction of the Muslim World from Pope Urban Two to Jewish Berry Obama) posted 03/20/2011Jafar Syed  M.A. LL.B. Research – International LawNew York    There is no international law. There is no international community. There is no UN and there is no UN Charter. And there is no NATO. It is only America, headed by eleventh crusader Jewish Berry Obama. He decides what is right and what is wrong. He decides who is a terrorist and who is not a terrorist. He decides which state is violating the human rights and which state is not violating the human rights.
He decides which nation is an occupied nation and which is not an occupied nation. He decides which ethnicity is to be “liberated” and which is not to be “liberated.” He decides that Sudanese occupied Kashmiris and Palestinians do not have the right to self-determination.And Jewish Berry Obama has poodles and a top poodle that back his every act. In 1095, it was Pope Urban Two who chose French, chosen people, to destroy the Muslim World. Now Corporate America has chosen Jewish Berry Obama to destroy the Muslim World. Note the dismemberment of Muslim Sudan. Note the “surge” in Afghanistan. And now it is Libya. Do not forget that Jewish Berry Obama is less than two year in power. A. Jewish Berry Obama decides to dismember Libya.   “As this article goes to Press, the NATO member states are holed up in their Brussels Headquarters yet again scheming together to attack a sovereign nation outside the auspices of the UNO. In other words, yet another act of terrorism, another breach of international law, another act of disrespect for the UNO and a violation of its Charter.“I correct myself. By "member states" I mean the United States of America, egged on eagerly by Top Poodle - the UK, while the other members sit and listen obediently while their contribution to yet another act of terrorism - an illegal attack against a sovereign state outside the auspices of international law - is pencilled into the scheme.” (Timothy Bancroft-Hinchey, Is NATO about to break international law again? Timothy Bancroft-Hinchey, Pravda, 10.03.2011) B. Jewish Berry Obama Top Poodle and Poodles to butcher Libyans and occupy LibyaWorld still remember the “coalition of the willing” to butcher the Iraqis and occupied Iraq. Now witness the ‘coalition of the top poodle and poodles.’ to butchers the Libyans. “A few token peace-keeping military police from the Portuguese, unwilling to ruffle many feathers; a more proactive role for the Baltic States, willing to make amends for their disgusting record during the Second World War; a nice bloodthirsty role for the British Gurkhas, Nepalese psychopaths sent in to slit throats with a Kukri knife, all in the name of King and Country, and so on. (Timothy Bancroft-Hinchey, Is NATO about to break international law again? Timothy Bancroft-Hinchey, Pravda, 10.03.2011)C. Jewish Berry Obama violates the UN charter to butcher the Libyans“An act of war has, under international law, to receive the sanction from the United Nations Security Council, this being the only proper forum of international law, and as agreed by NATO member states when they signed the UN Charter, is the only forum and legal body which can justify a causis belli - a cause for war.“Article 2 of the UN Charter prohibits the use of force against a sovereign state where it has not committed aggression on other states.“Article 2, paragraph 4 of the UN Charter states: "All Members shall refrain in their international relations from the threat or use of force against the territorial integrity or political independence of any state, or in any other manner inconsistent with the Purposes of the United Nations".“On the provisions which enable a nation to wage war, Article 51: "Nothing in the present Charter shall impair the inherent right of individual or collective self-defence if an armed attack occurs against a Member of the UNO, until the Security Council has taken measures necessary to maintain international peace and security. Measures taken by Members in the exercise of this right of self-defence shall be immediately reported to the Security Council and shall not in any way affect the authority and responsibility of the Security Council under the present Charter to take at any time such action as it deems necessary in order to maintain or restore international peace and security".“In the case of Libya, neither collective self-defence nor security are minimally in question. Any act of aggression involving military forces against Libya must necessarily come after a specific resolution justifying the same at the UNSC and after a separate Resolution has confirmed the collective action. A violation of Libyan airspace by NATO jets would be an act of war, and would render such equipment liable to being shot out of the sky.NATO has no jurisdiction whatsoever to act like the global policeman, firstly because this role belongs to the UNO (crimes are handled by the properly constituted police forces in any country, not a self-styled mob of vigilantes, which NATO has become) and anyway, who elected NATO to rule over the armed forces of its member states, let alone take unilateral control of any other region? Surely NATO's existential crisis is that it is unconstitutional?Article 53 (Chapter VIII) of the UN Charter clearly says that:"The Security Council shall, where appropriate, utilize such regional arrangements or agencies for enforcement action under its authority. But no enforcement action shall be taken under regional arrangements or by regional agencies without the authorization of the Security Council."“Before it commits (yet) another act of international terrorism, let us remind NATO of its own Charter, which claims it is a defensive organization and is only committed to force if one of its members is attacked."Article 1The Parties undertake, as set forth in the Charter of the United Nations, to settle any international dispute in which they may be involved by peaceful means in such a manner that international peace and security and justice are not endangered, and to refrain in their international relations from the threat or use of force in any manner inconsistent with the purposes of the United Nations. "Article 7This Treaty does not affect, and shall not be interpreted as affecting in any way the rights and obligations under the Charter of the Parties which are members of the United Nations, or the primary responsibility of the Security Council for the maintenance of international peace and security." (Timothy Bancroft-Hinchey, Is NATO about to break international law again? Timothy Bancroft-Hinchey, Pravda, 10.03.2011)D. Jewish Berry Obama hires mercenaries to occupy Libya“What has happened is that the USA has used mercenaries to sow chaos and then blame the Libyan authorities - a reason why one of the main leaders of the insurrection in Cyrenaica, Khaled Maassou, has claimed he is giving up because he does not agree with the participation of armed mercenaries commissioned by the USA on Libyan territory. (Timothy Bancroft-Hinchey, Is NATO about to break international law again? Timothy Bancroft-Hinchey, Pravda, 10.03.2011)E. Libya opens the door for investigation Libya, for its part, has called on the UNO and the African Union to form an International Peace Commission and has welcomed a free and fair investigation into the insurrection. NATO, for its part, would do well to heed the terms of the treaties its member states have signed and not commit yet another act of terrorism. (Timothy Bancroft-Hinchey, Is NATO about to break international law again? Timothy Bancroft-Hinchey, Pravda, 10.03.2011)F. Libyans have the right to defend their country from internal and external threats “Like any other nation, the Great Socialist People's Libyan Arab Jamahiriya (a State ruled by the people through People's Councils) has its laws and among these is the right of the Government to employ the authorities to protect the State against acts of vandalism, terrorism and armed insurrection. (Timothy Bancroft-Hinchey, Is NATO about to break international law again? Timothy Bancroft-Hinchey, Pravda, 10.03.2011

G. From Pope Urban Two (1095) to Jewish Berry Obama (2011)

 

In 1095, Pope Urban Two chose “chosen French” to destroy the Muslim World.

“In the year of our Lord's Incarnation one thousand and ninety-five, a great council was celebrated within the bounds of Gaul, in Auvergne, in the city which is called Clermont. Over this Pope Urban II presided, with the Roman bishops and cardinals. This council was a famous one on account of the concourse of both French and German bishops, and of princes as well. Having arranged the matters relating to the Church, the lord pope went forth into a certain spacious plain, for no building was large enough to hold all the people. The pope-then, with sweet and persuasive eloquence, addressed those present in words something like the following, saying:

"Oh, race of Franks, race from across the mountains, race beloved and chosen by God, - as is clear from many of your works,- set apart from all other nations by the situation of your country as well as by your Catholic faith and the honor which you render to the holy Church: to you our discourse is addressed, and for you our exhortations are intended. We wish you to know what a grievous cause has led us to your country, for it is the imminent peril threatening you and all the faithful which has brought us hither.

From the confines of Jerusalem and from the city of Constantinople a grievous report has gone forth and has -repeatedly been brought to our ears; namely, that a race from the kingdom of the Persians, an accursed race, a race wholly alienated from God, `a generation that set not their heart aright and whose spirit was not steadfast with God,' violently invaded the lands of those Christians and has depopulated them by pillage and fire. They have led away apart of the captives into their own country, and a part have they have killed by cruel tortures. They have either destroyed the churches of God or appropriated them for the rites of their own religion. They destroy the altars, after having defiled them with their uncleanness....The kingdom of the Greeks is now dismembered by them and has been deprived of territory so vast in extent that it could be traversed in two months' time.

"On whom, therefore, is the labor of avenging these wrongs and of recovering this territory incumbent, if not upon you, you upon whom, above all other nations, God has conferred remarkable glory in arms, great courage, bodily activity, and strength to humble the heads of those who resist you ? Let the deeds of your ancestors encourage you and incite your minds to manly achievements:-the greatness of King Charlemagne, and of his son Louis, and of your other monarchs, who have destroyed the kingdoms of the Turks and have extended the sway of Church over lands previously possessed by the pagan. Let the holy sepulcher of our Lord and Saviour, which is possessed by unclean nations, especially arouse you, and the holy places which are now treated, with ignominy and irreverently polluted with the filth of the unclean. Oh, most valiant soldiers and descendants of invincible ancestors, do not degenerate; our progenitors., but recall the valor of your progenitors.

"But if you are hindered by love of children, parents, or of wife, remember what the Lord says in the Gospel, `He that loveth father or mother more than me is not worthy of me', 'Every one that hath forsaken houses, or brethren, or sisters, or father, or mother, or wife, or children, or lands, for my name's sake, shall receive an hundredfold, and shall inherit everlasting life.' Let none of your possessions retain you, nor solicitude for you, family affairs. For this land which you inhabit, shut in on all sides by the seas and surrounded by the mountain peaks, is too narrow for your large population; nor does it abound in wealth; and it furnishes scarcely food enough for its cultivators. Hence it is that you murder and devour one another, that you wage war, and that very many among you perish in intestine strife.”( Urban II: Speech at Clermont 1095 (Robert the Monk version ... fordham.edu/halsall/source/urban2a)

 In 2011, Corporate America chooses Jewish Berry Obama to destroy the Muslim  e World. “The lUnited States also strongly supports the universal rights of the Libyan people.  That includes the rights of peaceful assembly, free speech, and the ability of the Libyan people to determine their own destiny.  These are human rights.  They are not negotiable.  They must be respected in every country.  And they cannot be denied through violence or suppression.”  (Barack Obama

Address on Libya: The Violence Must Stop

delivered 23 February 2011)

 

Occupied Palestinians by the “chosen Jews” and occupied Kashmiris by “chosen Brahmins” do not have the right to “determine their own destiny.”
////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////
Part 1. Eleventh Crusader Jewish Berry Obama and dismemberment of Libya. 
(Libya after Gadhafi: CIA finances
The National Front for the Salvation of Libya)
-U.S. and Europe should help Libyans to overthrow the regime of Gaddafi … Wall Street Journal) posted 03/08/2011

Jafar Syed
M.A. LL.B.
Research – International Affairs

Corporate media of America spins the wheel of misinformation as usual. This time it targets again a Muslim country Libya. It paints the situation in Tunisia, Egypt, and Libya analogous. It muffles the fact that America, Europe and European Jewish occupiers of the Muslim Palestine never accepted Col. Gaddafi. His sins and crimes? He identified with the anti-occupation forces all over the world. On domestic front, Libya is not the Libya that he took over in 1969 from a puppet King Idris. Corporate media of the America does not tell that there is a direct link between the present unrest in Libya and Col. Gaddafi’s incorporation in the corporate America after occupation of Iraq by Baby Bush.

Spinning the wheel. “Two weeks have elapsed since the first demonstrations in Benghazi and Tripoli. The disinformation campaign about Libya has sown confusion in the world. First a certainty: the analogies with events in Tunisia and Egypt are misplaced. These rebellions contributed obviously to depoliticize street protests in both neighboring countries, but the peculiar Libyan process has characteristics inseparable from the conspiring strategy of imperialism and what can be defined as the metamorphosis of a leader.
“The solidarity of the major media in the U.S. and the European Union with the rioting of terrorists in Libya was obviously hypocritical. The Wall Street Journal, a publication for big worldwide finance, did not hesitate to suggest in an editorial (February 23) that "the U.S. and Europe should "help 'Libyans' overthrow the regime of Gaddafi."
“Obama, in expectation, was silent on Libya for six days. On the seventh, he condemned the violence and called for sanctions. It followed an emergency meeting of the UN Security Council and an expected package of sanctions.

The marketing campaign underway of major international media expands the organizers of the rebellion as heroes while they present Gaddafi as a killer and paranoid. The coming days and tomorrow are unpredictable in Libya, the third largest oil producer in Africa, a country whose wealth is now largely falling into the hands of imperialism.
“However, the air strikes that western corporate media claim took place on February 22 over Benghazi and Tripoli, which were widely reported by the likes of the BBC and Al Jazeera, with hands wringing and crocodile tears flowing...were not registered by the Russian military chiefs examining the images coming in from satellites.
“The satellite pictures show that, ‘nothing of that sort has been going on on the ground.’ states Irina Galushko, adding that there is also no evidence from footage shot by television cameras which suggests that any airborne attacks took place. So there you go, lies from beginning to end.” (Miguel Urbano Rodrigues, Libya: What the media is hiding, 02.03.2011, Translated from the Portuguese version and appended by: Lisa Karpova, Pravda.Ru, Lisa Karpova

Why is Gadhafi not acceptable to American elite and the European Jewish occupiers of Muslim Palestine? “Muammar Gaddafi, unlike Ben Ali and Hosni Mubarak, took an anti-imperialist position when he seized power in 1969. A puppet monarchy was abolished, and for decades he has practised a policy of independence, beginning with the nationalisation of oil. He has practised a strategy that promoted economic development and reduced egregious social inequality.
“Libya joined with countries and movements that fought against imperialism and Zionism. Gaddafi founded universities and industries, a flourishing agriculture emerged from the desert sands, hundreds of thousands of citizens for the first time had a right to decent housing.

“The bombing of Tripoli and Benghazi in l986 by the U.S. Air Force showed that the Reagan White House identified the Libyan leader as an enemy to beat. Heavy sanctions were applied to the country.” (Miguel Urbano Rodrigues, Libya: What the media is hiding, 02.03.2011, appended by: Lisa Karpova, Pravda.Ru, Lisa Karpova
Incorporation does not help Col. Gadhafi. Remember what Mayor Ed Koch said that Jews have long memory. He was reminding Rev. Jesse Jackson about his comments about “Hemi town.” Eventually Rev. Jesse Jackson was incorporated in the Jewish worldwide-empire.      “Since the second Gulf War, Gaddafi turned 180 degrees. Libya was subjected to IMF demands, dozens of companies were privatised, and the country was opened to major international oil companies.
“Washington came to see Gadhafi as a leader to dialogue with. He was received with special honours in Europe; fabulous contracts were signed with the governments of Sarkozy, Berlusconi and Brown. But when price increases in major Libyan cities sparked a wave of discontent, imperialism seized the opportunity. They concluded that it was time to get rid of Gaddafi, an always uncomfortable leader.

“The riots in Tunisia and Egypt, protests in Bahrain and Yemen have created very favorable conditions to instigate demonstrations in Libya. It was no accident that Benghazi emerged as the hub of the rebellion. Major transnational oil companies operate in Cyrenaica, the ends of pipelines and gas pipelines are located there.

“The National Front for the Salvation of Libya, an organization financed by the CIA, was activated. It is instructive that it was the city to see the rapid emergence in the streets of the old monarchy flag and portraits of the late King Idris, the tribal chief Senussi crowned by England after the expulsion of the Italians. A "prince" Senussi suddenly appeared to give interviews.”
(Miguel Urbano Rodrigues, Libya: What the media is hiding, 02.03.2011, appended by: Lisa Karpova, Pravda.Ru, Lisa Karpova
Is it the first time that corporate media of the United States is clearing the way for the slaughter of another nation? The answer is no. It played the same role in the occupation of Iraq. Now the world knows that every justification given by the media to occupy Iraq was not true.
Libya - an other Iraq. “Launcelot Gobbo told his elderly father in a poignant moment in William Shakespeare's play Merchant of Venice, "Truth will come to light; murder cannot be hid long." But the tragedy of life is often that by the time "truth is out", Gobbo would have become sand-blind and would no more be able to see his son.

“For the hundreds of thousands of Iraqis who perished since 2003, it is no consolation that the "truth is out" - that the war was a phony one bred by greed and imperial arrogance. Which is why it becomes important that the United States' proposed intervention in Libya shouldn't turn out to be another sojourn in yet another unknown land of killings.”  (M K Bhadrakumar, Libya puts China in world stage spotlight, Asia Times, Middle East, March 8, 2011. Ambassador M K Bhadrakumar was a career diplomat in the Indian Foreign Service. His assignments included the Soviet Union, South Korea, Sri Lanka, Germany, Afghanistan, Pakistan, Uzbekistan, Kuwait and Turkey.)

Note another oil predator that is waiting to occupy another Muslim country. It is Great Britain. It has specially trained 30, 000 butchers to butcher 6 million Libyans.    

“The events over the recent days may produce a strategic shock and change in how we view the world. The speed of events in North Africa has shown how quickly circumstances can change and how quickly the UK can be drawn in. An island like Britain, with so many interests in so many parts of the world ... is inevitably affected by global stability ... If required, we could field a force of 30,000, including maritime and air assets for a one-off intervention. Although I cannot go into detail, our internationally respected and battle-tested Special Forces will receive significantly enhanced capabilities.
(Excerpt from British Defense Secretary Liam Fox article quoted by Ambassador Bhadrakumar in the article Libya puts China in world stage spotlight, Asia Times, Middle East, March 8, 2011.

Every student of history knows the predator history of Great Britain and France. Less is known to the masses what the Americans have been doing since the occupation of America by the British occupiers—later called the Americans.
“The drive for territorial and economic expansion has been a dominant theme of the American experience. The descendants and followers of those who settled Jamestown, Plymouth, and Massachusetts Bay were adventurous pragmatists whose acquisitiveness drove them beyond their legitimate boundaries and gained them an empire. The new nation wrested the Mississippi boundary from England and grasped at the opportunity to acquire Louisiana; it had the temerity to issue the Monroe Doctrine and the ruthlessness to instigate the Mexican War. Toward the close of the nineteenth century this drive became flagrantly imperialistic as the maturing nation succeeded in extending its influence from the Caribbean to China, with implication envisioned by only an astute few.
“A GREAT NATIONAL ABERRATION?
“There are two general approaches to nineteenth-century American imperialism. In its more narrow conception, imperialism has been viewed as the denial of one nation’s sovereignty by another nation: its broader definition, control of another people’s resources, trade, and markets, even if such control does not bring with it the total loss of territorial integrity and national sovereignty, is seen as imperialistic. In this chapter, the concept is utilized in its broader sense.
“Some ‘new Left’ historians such as William Appleman Williams, have insisted that if the concept of expansionism and imperialism are enlarged to include the economic sphere, the nation has been imperialistic from its very inception. Preferring the term ‘colonialism to imperialism, Walter La Feber suggests that ‘the United States did not set out on an expansionist path in the late 1890s in a sudden, spur-of- the moment fashion. The overseas empire controlled in 1900 was not a break in their history, but a natural culmination. .. American neither acquired empire during a temporary absence of mind nor had the empire forced upon them. Another commentator, Richard Van Alstyne, has observed that “The early colonies were no sooner established in the seventeenth century than expansionist impulses began to register in each of them. Imperial patterns took shape, and before the middle of the eighteenth century the concept of an empire that would take in the whole continent was fully formed.” (Ronald J. Caridi, 20th Century American Foreign Policy Security and Self Interest, p1-2)
Note the bloody hands of America since World War 11 to the end of Soviet Union. To maintain the American Empire “called the free world,” Americans butchered 123 million human beings. Two-thirds were civilians. This butchery took place to save the world from “Red danger.” Under the slogan “Soviet are coming” military-industrial complex were given $12 trillion of American Tax payers sweat and blood. “In the 149 wars between the end World War 11 and 1992, more than 123 million people died. Two-thirds of the victims were noncombatants. In 1992, over 18 million people were still refugees relying totally on UN or private relief agencies. From the end of the Korean war to the fall of the Berlin in 1989, The U.S. spent $12 trillion for defense, a price we thought necessary – and thus were willing to pay – to prevent an even more expensive and ghastly nuclear war with the Soviet Union and allies. (The Defense Monitor,  Volume xxv, Number 1, January 1996).
Note how many human beings are butchered since the bloody dawn of 21 century.  
This butchery did not stop with the end of Soviet Union.  Now the Muslims are targeted as terrorists. Now the slogans are “Muslim terrorists are coming”  and “humanitarian interference.”
 
In this background, do not buy the argument that occupation of Libya is necessary to save the Libyans from Col. Gaddafi. It is oil, stupid.

/////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////
King Farouk does not sell the Palestinian brothers. Why now?
(1948. U.S. Secret documents, Palestine and Jewish Connection) posted: 02/23/ 2011

Highlights
- Even the king of an occupied country does not sell the Palestinian nation to the European Jews. “Farouk [King Farouk of Egypt] listened attentively to points as I developed them and then, with reference to expressed hope that Egypt set example in restraint, stated there was nothing he could do, even if he wanted to prevail upon other Arab states to curb their proposed action or to influence their attitude. Arab countries, he said, had made firm decision and they intend to carry it out. (The Ambassador in Egypt Tuck to the Secretary of State)
- In the name of international affairs, US Ambassador Tuck tries to trap the Egyptian King to sell the Palestinian nations to the European Jews   “Acquiescence on part of Arab state in UNGA decision on Palestine would remove that area as disturbing influence in international affairs.” (The Ambassador in Egypt Tuck to the Secretary of State)
- Truman leadership lies that it does not use coercive measure to give Muslim Palestine to European Jews under the banner of UN “partition plan.”  “He [King] showed interest in the reasons given for U.S. Government support of partition and in assurance that no undue pressure was brought upon other countries by US governmental officials responsible to executive. This latter assurance, he added, was contrary to reliable information which he had previously obtained.” (The Ambassador in Egypt Tuck to the Secretary of State)
- I am forced to the conclusion that our government failed to convince him [King] and have in no way changed his views  …(The Ambassador in Egypt Tuck to the Secretary of State)
- Saudis patriotic and heroic role to save the Palestinians brothers from auction. “His Majesty believes US policy prejudicial both Arabs and US and against their mutual interests. His Majesty sincerely desires maintain existing friendly relations between Saudi Arabian Government and US Government and this motive had inspired His Majesty to US Government to reconsider its position in this case, in hope US Government would attentively listen to its sincere friend.” (The Ambassador in Egypt Tuck to the Secretary of State)
- Note the representatives who are selling the Muslim Palestinians to the European Jews. “The United Nations Palestine Commission, established under the General Assembly resolution of November 29, 1947, consisted of representatives of Bolivia, Czechoslovakia, Denmark, Panama and the Philippines, with Karel Lisicky of Czechoslovakia serving as Chairman and Ralph J. Bunch of the United States as Secretary.” (The Ambassador in Egypt Tuck to the Secretary of State)
- Occupied Arab leadership does not sell the Palestinian nation. “The Arab Higher Committee, on January 19, telegraphically rejected the invitation, stating that it was “determined persist in rejection partition and in refusal recognize UNO resolution this report and anything deriving therefrom.”

Jafar Syed
M.A., LL.B.
Researcher – International Affairs
New York

It is 1948. Top secret telegram of US Ambassador Tuck in Egypt highlights the following facts.

- US Ambassador Tuck wants that King Farouk become a model of “restraint.” Restraint is a code word for not resisting the sale of Palestinians. King also informs Ambassador Tuck that Arabs will resists the sale of their Palestinians brothers.   
- Besides making the King Farouk as example of “restraint,” Ambassador Tuck informs the King about the blessings of “acquiescence.”
- Truman leadership used coercive measures to get Partition Plan.
- Ambassador Tuck confesses that he could not trap the King Farouk
- Saudis warns the Truman administration of the adverse effects of giving Muslim Palestine to the Jews. 
- Composition of the United Nation Palestinian Commission demonstrates without any doubt that it cannot be fair  

1948. Contents of the top secret telegram of Ambassador Tuck in Egypt.

867.01/1-748: Telegram
The Ambassador in Egypt (Tuck) to the Secretary of State

Top SECRET                CAIRO, JANUARY 7, 1948                           1 p.m.
 
21. We received in audience by King (1) yesterday afternoon and with help of carefully prepared notes conveyed to him informally and orally purport your confidential verbatim telegram 1695 of December 26, 5 p.m. (2).

Farouk listened attentively to points as I developed them and then, with reference to expressed hope that Egypt set example in restraint, stated there was nothing he could do, even if he wanted to prevail
upon other Arab states to curb their proposed action or to influence their attitude. Arab countries, he said, had made firm decision and they intend to carry it out. He added that tenor of my remarks reminded him strangely [strongly?] of what late President Roosevelt had said to him on same subject at time of their meeting in 1945 (3). He qualified my remarks as “very optimistic” as to the future particularly in connection with the expressed belief that acquiescence on part of Arab state in UNGA decision on Palestine would remove that area as disturbing influence in international affairs.

He showed interest in the reasons given for U.S. Government support of partition and in assurance that no undue pressure was brought upon other countries by US governmental officials responsible to executive. This latter assurance, he added, was contrary to reliable information which he had previously obtained.

I am forced to the conclusion that our government failed to convince him and have in no way changed his views. (4)
                                                        TUCK
1. King Farouk of Egypt
2. Foreign Relations, 1947, vol.v. p. 1319
3. For documentation on the conversation between President Roosevelt and the monarch of Egypt, Ethiopia, and Saudi Arabia at Great Bitter Lake, Egypt, in February 1945, see Foreign Relations, 1945, vol. V111, pp.1ff.
4. On January 12, Prince Faisal, the Saudi Arabian Minister for Foreign Affairs, handed to Minister Childs a message to the United States Government from King Abdul Aziz ibn Saud. He then stated that “His Majesty believes US policy prejudicial both Arabs and US and against their mutual interests. His Majesty sincerely desires maintain existing friendly relations between Saudi Arabian Government and US Government and this motive had inspired His Majesty to US Government to reconsider its position in this case, in hope US Government would attentively listen to its sincere friend.” (Telegram 14 January 13, noon, from Jidda, 501. BB. Palestine/1- 1348)
 The king’s message, in the form of an undated memorandum, was transmitted to Jidda in telegram 15, January 13, 3 p.m., not printed

     Editorial note
The United Nations Palestine Commission, established under the General Assembly resolution of November 29, 1947, consisted of representatives of Bolivia, Czechoslovakia, Denmark, Panama and the Philippines, with Karel Lisicky of Czechoslovakia serving as Chairman and Ralph J. Bunch of the United States as Secretary. The Commission held its meeting on January 9, 1948, and unanimously adopting a resolution calling on the Secretary-General of the United Nations to invite the Mandatory Power, the Arab Higher Committee, and the Jewish Agency to designate representatives who would provide the Commission with authoritative information and other assistance.

The Secretary-General, the same day, transmitted such invitations. They were promptly accepted by the United Kingdom and the Jewish Agency, which designated Sir Alexander Cadogan, British Representative at the United Nations, and Moshe Shertok, respectively, as their representative. The Arab Higher Committee, on January 19, telegraphically rejected the invitation, stating that it was “determined persist in rejection partition and in refusal recognize UNO resolution this report and anything deriving therefrom. (United Nations, Official Records of the Security Council, Third Year, Special Supplement No. 2, hereinafter cited as SC. 3rd yr. Special Suppl. No. 2, Pages 1,2).

SOURCE: INTEREST OF THE UNITED STATES IN THE ARAB-ISRAEL CONTROVERSY OVER THE FUTURE STATUS OF PALESTINE; THE ISSUE AT THE UNITED NATIONS (1): CREATION OF THE STATE OF ISRAEL; ENTRY OF ARAB FORCES INTO PALESTINE, Foreign Relations, 1848, Volume V, pp. 539-54i.
Few Comments:  Is it not a shame that occupied Arab leadership was determined not to sell their Palestinians brother in 1948. Today that consensus is smashed. Why? 
/////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////
Jews bomb Arabs … Director NEA Henderson
(1948. U.S. Secret documents, Palestine and Jewish Connection) posted: 02/23/ 2011

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Highlights
 
- Mr. Epstein, Director of the Washington Office of the Jewish Agency for Palestine, and Mr. Eban, representative of Jewish Agency, called on Mr. Henderson and  Mr. Rusk and Mr. Merriam separately today for the purpose of reporting current developments with regard to Palestine and eliciting the further support of the United States Government in implementation of the recent UN recommendations to partition Palestine … Memorandum of Conversation
-  Mr. Eban pointed out that the Jewish Agency was particularly concerned with two aspects of the UN Recommendation at the present time: (1) immigration; (2) security… Memorandum of Conversation
- Mr. Eban said that the Jewish Agency hoped that the British authorities would be able to provide a seaport by February 1 … Memorandum of Conversation
- Mr. Eban said that he understood the Syrian representative and the Polish representative on the Security Council might raise the Palestine question as a threat to international peace and security and observed that this might be appropriate time for the U.S. Government to make known it views… Memorandum of Conversation
- Major Eban said that at the present time, the Haganah, which would be the armed militia in the proposed Jewish States, was adequately manned but poorly equipped and that it was essential that supplies be obtained… Memorandum of Conversation
- Mr. Eban expressed the view that current newspapers reports and information being received from Palestine indicated that the Arabs hoped the UN recommendation to partition Palestine would not be implemented and that the Jews feared no action would be taken to put into effect… Memorandum of Conversation
- Strong support by the U.S. for partition in the Security Council and the provision of equipment for the Jewish militia would indicate American determination and would thus have a stabilizing effect on the situation in Palestine… Memorandum of Conversation
- Mr. Henderson recalled the recent attack at the Consolidated Refinery in Haifa in which Jews bombed Arabs … Memorandum of Conversation
- Mr. Henderson pointed out that a continuation of terroristic activities which resulted in the killing of innocent people would have a brutalizing effect … Memorandum of Conversation
- Mr. Eban said that he agreed it was essential that actual steps to be taken regarding the commencement of immigration and the establishment of security forces in advance of the departure of the British from Palestine … Memorandum of Conversation
- Mr. Rusk said that he stressed this aspect of the situation because he believed that Mr. Epstein and Mr. Eban were well aware of the many legal difficulties attendant on further consideration of the Palestine problem in the Security Council … Memorandum of Conversation

Jafar Syed
M.A. LL.B.
Researcher – International Affairs
New York

It is 1948. Memorandum of Conversation, by Mr. Fraser Wilkins of the Division of Near Eastern Affairs highlights the following facts.

1. After bagging the Partition Plan from the coerced and bribed UN, Jewish leadership is coercing the Truman administration (1945-1953) for implementation of the Partition Plan.
2. Jewish leadership needs the help of Truman administration to dumps as many Jews as possible from all over the world without wasting any time. It also seeks the help of Truman administration to have a seaport by February 1. 
3. Jewish leadership needs the help of Truman administration to block any attempt by the U.N. Security Council members detrimental to the Jewish cause
4. Jewish leadership confesses that Haganah is adequately manned
5. Jewish leadership expresses it concerns about the implementation of Partition Plan

6. Mr. Henderson reminds the Jewish leadership for bombing the Arabs
7. Truman representative reminds the Jewish leadership about the legal implications of involving the Security Council again 

Contents of the restricted memorandum

“501. BB. Palestine/1-648
Memorandum of Conversation by Mr. Fraser Wilkins of the Division of Eastern Affairs

Restricted   [Washington,] January 6,
Participants: Mr. Epstein, Jewish Agency (1)
                     Mr. Eban, Jewish Agency
                     Mr. Henderson, NEA
                     Mr. Rusk, SPA (2)
                     Mr. Merriam, NE (3)
                     Mr. Wilkins, NE

Mr. Epstein and Mr. Eban called on Mr. Henderson,
Mr. Rusk and Mr. Merriam separately today for the purpose of reporting current developments with regard to Palestine and eliciting the further support of the United States Government in implementation of the recent UN recommendations to partition Palestine.

Mr. Eban said that he had accompanied UNSCOP during its investigation last summer and that more recently had been acting as a liaison officer for the Jewish agency with the UN in New York. Mr. Eban pointed out that the Jewish Agency was particularly concerned with two aspects of the UN Recommendation at the present time: (1) immigration; (2) security. Mr. Eban said that the Jewish Agency hoped that the British authorities would be able to provide a seaport by February 1 (4) in order that immigration might commence at once but that unless the UN Commission was able successfully to negotiate with British authorities, it did not appear that immigration would take place as soon as hoped.
With regard to security, Mr. Eban expressed the view that two matters might be considered under this heading: (1) action by the Security Council; (2) action by the militia authorized in the UN recommendation. With regard to the first, Mr. Eban recalled that the American representatives at the UN had remarked during recent UN consideration of the Palestine problem that the U.S. would play its part.
For this reason, Major Eban hoped that the United States would support such action relating to security as the Security Council might deem it appropriate to take. Mr. Eban said that he understood the Syrian representative and the Polish representative on the Security Council might raise the Palestine question as a threat to international peace and security and observed that this might be appropriate time for the U.S. Government to make known it views. With regard to militia forces in each of the proposed states in Palestine, Mr. Eban said that he hoped that the members of the UN including the United States would be in a position to arm and equip these forces. Major Eban said that at the present time, the Haganah, which would be the armed militia in the proposed Jewish States, was adequately manned but poorly equipped and that it was essential that supplies be obtained.
Mr. Eban expressed the view that current newspapers reports and information being received from Palestine indicated that the Arabs hoped the UN recommendation to partition Palestine would not be implemented and that the Jews feared no action would be taken to put into effect. Mr. Eban thought this basic approach to be problem on the part of the Arabs and Jews was one of the major factors in the present situation and expressed the belief that strong support by the U.S. for partition in the Security Council and the provision of equipment for the Jewish militia would indicate American determination and would thus have a stabilizing effect on the situation in Palestine.
Mr. Henderson said that he had been following recent developments in Palestine closely and was very much concerned with the type of incidents which were taking place in Palestine. Mr. Henderson recalled the recent attack at the Consolidated Refinery in Haifa in which Jews bombed Arabs and Arabs in reprisal killed some 30 to 40 Jews in spite of the fact that both Jews and Arabs had worked in harmony previously. Mr. Henderson pointed out that a continuation of terroristic activities which resulted in the killing of innocent people would have a brutalizing effect and would cause many serious doubts as to whether either the Arabs or the Jews were sufficiently mature to govern themselves. Mr. Henderson asked Epstein and Mr. Eban whether they thought the issuance of a statement by the UN or possibly by the US deploring such activities and pointing out the inevitable consequences would have a salutary effect. Both Epstein and Mr. Eban were of the opinion that the issuance of statement of this type would be helpful and said that, as far the Jews were concerned, they were making every effort to conduct themselves with restraint. Mr. Epstein stressed the fact that the Jews were desirous of acting in accordance with the UN recommendation and hoped that the UN would support their activities.
Mr. Rusk remarked in reply to Mr. Eban’s statements regarding immigration and security that he believed the establishment of a modus Vivendi between the Jews and the Arabs was the most important question for consideration at this time since all other matters were of necessity corollary to it. Mr. Eban said that he agreed it was essential that actual steps to be taken regarding the commencement of immigration and the establishment of security forces in advance of the departure of the British from Palestine. Mr. Rush said he understood the members of the UN Commission had now been appointed and that it would meet on January 9 or 10, and that he hoped that the Jews would shortly initiate conversation with the commission, the British authorities and the Arabs. Mr. Rusk said the successful implementation of the UN recommendation hinged on the working out of details with these three groups. Mr. Rusk said that he stressed this aspect of the situation because he believed that Mr. Epstein and Mr. Eban were well aware of the many legal difficulties attendant on further consideration of the Palestine problem in the Security Council. Mr. Rusk said that, for this reason, it was extremely important that both the Jews and the Arabs should attempt to settle the problems with regard to Palestine as well as they could by themselves and should only fall back on UN action as a last resort.
Mr. Epstein and Mr. Eban expressed their appreciation for the various views expressed and said that Mr. Shertok (5) was returning to the US from Palestine via London toward the end of this week and that he would undoubtedly call at the Department for the purpose of presenting further information with regard to current developments in Palestine.

1. Eliahu Epstein, Director of the Washington Office of the Jewish Agency for Palestine.
2. Dean Rusk, Director of the Office of Special Political Affairs.
3. Gordon P. Merriam, Chief of the Division of Near Eastern Affairs.
4. The partition resolution of the General Assembly provided that “The mandatory Power shall use its best endeavours to ensure that an area situated in the territory of the Jewish State, including a seaport and hinterland adequate to provide facilities for a substantial immigration, shall be evacuated at the earliest possible date and in any event not later than 1 February, 1948.” (Appendix, p.1711)
5. Moshe Shertok, Head of the Political Department of the Jewish Agency.

SOURCE: INTEREST OF THE UNITED STATES IN THE ARAB-ISRAEL CONTROVERSY OVER THE FUTURE STATUS OF PALESTINE; THE ISSUE AT THE UNITED NATIONS (1): CREATION OF THE STATE OF ISRAEL; ENTRY OF ARAB FORCES INTO PALESTINE, Foreign Relations, 1848, Volume V, pp. 533-537.

Few Comments: It is 1948. In “Part 1. Arab opposition to partition is not a wild talk” Secretary of State Marshall and Secretary of States Bevin mainly discuss the implications of Partition Plan, reaction of the Arab leadership and its masses. In Part 2, representatives of Jewish Agency inform the Truman administration about Jewish priorities and desired  actions for the implementation of  the Partition Plan

Note.
1.  Never forget, it is 1948. After six decades, the main actors are the same and Muslim Palestine is still under occupation.
2. All material posted on the Muslimmediany.org is free. Please give the reference of Muslimmediany.org when any material is used
3. The main purpose of the Muslimmediany.org is to give the original sources to the readers and writers to be quoted again and again for the cause of occupied Palestinians

/////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////
Part 1. Arab opposition to “Partition” is not a wild talk … British Secretary of State Ernest Bevin
(1948. U.S. secret documents and Jewish connection) Posted: 02/21/2011

Highlights
- Mr. Bevin said that the reactions of the Arab
Government to the recommendation of the United Nations on Palestine (4) had been worse than he had expected, in spite of the efforts which were being made by British representatives in the Arab states to bring the Government concerned to a more reasonable frame of mind …Memorandum of January 1948

- Mr. Bevin added that he was proposing to see Arab representatives in London, one by one, in order to steady them … Memorandum of January 1948
- The British Government feared that the situation in the Middle East might get out of control and seriously endanger the U.S. and British position there, which could only benefit the Soviet Union… Memorandum of January 1948
- Those views were mostly elicited in conversations at which British representatives informed the Arab Governments in general terms of British plans for withdrawal from Palestine and urged that Arab leaders should take no action which might render the British task more difficult… Memorandum of January 1948
- but it is clear that it would be dangerous to make any assumption that Arab opposition to partition is mainly wild talk … Memorandum of January 1948
- The Arab governments do not believe that they can restrain their national from volunteering for service in Palestine …Memorandum of January 1948
- There is much concern whether restraint is also being urged upon the Jews. This concern is likely to be increased as a result of the recent disturbance in Palestine in which Arab casualties have been somewhat larger than Jewish casualties… Memorandum of January 1948
- Considerable bitterness was expressed against the British Government for having adopted a neutral attitude in New York,  and more especially against the United States Government for their more positive stand in favour of partition… Memorandum of January 1948
- Riad Sulh, for example, urged that the Middle East was changing and that the time had surely come for the British Government to consolidate their friendship with the Arabs… Memorandum of January 1948
- The British Government’s treaties with Iraq and Egypt (9) were under consideration for revision, and what use could that Transjordan be, if Palestine were lost? … Memorandum of January 1948
- If the British would only give a line, moderate men would support the Regent and the Government in guiding the policy of Iraq… Memorandum of January 1948
- The enemies of the Regent and of Government would be able to say that the only result of a thirty years’ alliance was that, if only passively, the British were foisting Jews on the Arab world… Memorandum of January 1948
- The situation could not be held, Qadri concluded, unless the British came forward with concrete suggestions which showed that they really were prepared to help the Arabs… Memorandum of January 1948
- The Transjordan Government is still interested in securing for itself the Arab portions of Palestine and appears to have some hope of doing a deal with the Jews. It does not want troops from other Arab States to pass through its territory, but it may cooperate to some extent with the other members of the Arab League as a result of their recent meeting… Memorandum of January 1948
- In the view of the British Government, the situation which is the now developing over Palestine thus represents a grave threat to the position of both … Memorandum of January 1948
- While the British Government will in no way obstruct the execution of the decision taken by the United Nations, they intend to do their utmost to preserve their position and influence in that area… Memorandum of January 1948

Jafar Syed
M.A. LL.B.
Researcher – International Affairs
New York

It is 1948. Top Secret Memorandum from the British Embassy to the State Department of State highlights the following facts.

- British leadership admits that Arab- street reaction to “partition Plan” was unexpected
- British Secretary of State Ernest Bevin plans to steady the Arab leadership
- Arab leadership admits that they cannot control the masses
- Gulf exists between the Arab leadership and the Arabs on the “Partition Plan.”
- Jews should also be constrained
- On the issue of “Partition,” Arabs were angry for the role of British and American leadership
- Arabs leaders were begging for some concession from the British
- British are foisting Jews on the Arab world
- Jordanian leadership wants to grab part of Palestine through a deal with the Jews
- Everybody knows that Arabs will resist the partition with arms
- Partition of Palestine will have adverse effect on British and American interests


Contents of the Top Secret Memorandum

“867.01/1-548

The British Embassy to the Department of State

TOP SECRET
G2/-47
   MEMORANDUM

During a conversation between Mr. Bevin (2) and Mr. Marshall in London on the 17th December, (3) Mr. Bevin said that the reactions of the Arab Government to the recommendation of the United Nations on Palestine (4) had been worse than he had expected, in spite of the efforts which were being made by British representatives in the Arab states to bring the Government concerned to a more reasonable frame of mind. Mr. Bevin added that he was proposing to see Arab representatives in London, one by one, in order to steady them. The British Government feared that the situation in the Middle East might get out of control and seriously endanger the U.S. and British position there, which could only benefit the Soviet Union.
2. In amplification of Mr. Bevin’s remarks, and in the spirit of the recent conversations on the Middle East between United States and United Kingdom representatives (5), the following summary is provided, for the strictly confidential information of the State Department, of the views on Palestine which have in the last few weeks been expressed to British officials by Arab representatives in the countries concerned. Those views were mostly elicited in conversations at which British representatives informed the Arab Governments in general terms of British plans for withdrawal from Palestine and urged that Arab leaders should take no action which might render the British task more difficult. The following were the main points which
emerged.

a. All the Arab representatives were willing to give an assurance that they would avoid action of any kind likely to bring them to into conflict with the British Government during the period of withdrawal; but it is clear that it would be dangerous to make any assumption that Arab opposition to partition is mainly wild talk.
b. The Arab governments do not believe that they can restrain their national from volunteering for service in Palestine. This was mentioned, for example, by the Egyptians Minister of Foreign Affairs, by the Acting Prime Minister of Iraq, by Riad Sulh (Lebanon), by Jamil Mardam (Syria) and by Samir Pasha (Transjordan). (6)
c. There is much concern whether restraint is also being urged upon the Jews. This was mentioned, for example, by the Egyptians Minister of Foreign Affairs and by Yusef Yasin (7) (Saudi Arabia). This concern is likely to be increased as a result of the recent disturbance in Palestine in which Arab casualties have been somewhat larger than Jewish casualties.
d. Considerable bitterness was expressed against the British Government for having adopted a neutral attitude in New York, 8 and more especially against the United States Government for their more positive stand in favour of partition. Such criticism of the American attitude, which was sometimes stated in terms of general references to “dollar diplomacy” and of the consequent need for friendship specifically with Britain, may in part have been actuated by a desire to play off Britain against the United States.
e. It is clear that any attempt to provide for mutual defence arrangement in the Middle East is likely to meet with great difficulties. Riad Sulh, for example, urged that the Middle East was changing and that the time had surely come for the British Government to consolidate their friendship with the Arabs. The British Government’s treaties with Iraq and Egypt (9) were under consideration for revision, and what use could that Transjordan be, if Palestine were lost? He considered that the British Government should come to some agreement with the Arabs as a whole and, as it were, capitalise their good will. He deplored any that Anglo-Arab relations should be exposed to too great strain, through what would seem to the Arabs to be British support for partition, and he asserted that his sentiments were shared by all other Arabs.

3. There are other indication such as that mentioned in the following paragraph, that there is a general desire for some kind formal understanding with Great Britain, without which Arab leaders fear that the situation may get of hand. No Arab representative has yet stated in concrete terms what kind of a lead was required; their plea was in the form of: Cannot you do something to help us.
 
4. That this situation may have a bearing on one concrete and very important interest of the British Government (and of the United States Government) – namely a revised Anglo-Iraqi treaty – is indicated by the remarks of Tahsin Qadri, Master of Ceremonies at the Palace in Baghdad, which reflected the deep feeling shown in earlier conversations by Saleh Jabr (10) and Nuri (11). He said that for the past thirty years the British had been able to give a line which the Iraqi Government had been able to follow with advantage to both countries, and he could not understand why they should now give the Iraqis no guidance at all except to keep calm. If the British would only give a line, moderate men would support the Regent and the Government in guiding the policy of Iraq. But without any word from the British the situation would go from bad to worse. The enemies of the Regent and of Government would be able to say that the only result of a thirty years’ alliance was that, if only passively, the British were foisting Jews on the Arab world. The pressure on any Iraqi Government would be so great that the most desperate and dangerous steps would be taken, with disastrous effects on Anglo-Iraqi relations. The situation could not be held, Qadri concluded, unless the British came forward with concrete suggestions which showed that they really were prepared to help the Arabs. The danger to our treaty negotiations, which this situation represents, needs no emphasis and it is evident that this depth of feeling is shared by other Arab leaders.
5. There are a few other items of information which have a bearing on this question. The Transjordan Government is still interested in securing for itself the Arab portions of Palestine and appears to have some hope of doing a deal with the Jews. It does not want troops from other Arab States to pass through its territory, but it may cooperate to some extent with the other members of the Arab League as a result of their recent meeting. At this meeting, according to confidential information received by the British Government, it appears that quotas were agreed upon for the proportion of arms to be supplied by each member. But no decision was reached on the quotas were agreed upon for the proportion of arms to be supplied by each member. But no decision was reached on the quota of volunteers, the actual number of which it was not felt possible to determine. The activities of the volunteers are to be controlled by Ismail Sawfat, who would be released from the Iraqi Army for this purpose, and there are to be local commanders in Palestine. But it was generally agreed that the open use of Arab armies against the Jews, ever after the termination of the Mandate, was not practicable at present.

6. The remarks of Raid Sulh, as well as those of Tahsin Qadri clearly indicate the effect which the Palestine problem may have upon future plans in the Middle East, even though the British Government continue to follow the course already marked out in the statements made by British representatives at Lake Success. They also clearly reveal the great obstacles which will for some time be set in the way of concerted Anglo-American action in the Middle East. It was agreed in the recent talks that Palestine presented special problems. But these Arab reactions again demonstrate in the British position, but may well frustrate all plans for Anglo-American support throughout the area.
7. In the view of the British Government, the situation which is the now developing over Palestine thus represents a grave threat to the position of both
countries in the Middle East. While the British Government will in no way obstruct the execution of the decision taken by the United Nations, they intend to do their utmost to preserve their position and influence in that area. In so doing they are working for ends which both Governments have decided, at the highest level, to be in their respective interests. They have already asked the Arab Governments to avoid precipitate action and to restrain their nationals. But counsels of patience should be offered, not to one side, but both.

8. The British Government are sure that the United States Government realize the dangers to which attention has been drawn. They are sure, too, that the United States Government realize the need for the most careful handling of this most difficult problem and the need viewing it against the wider international background, if all the efforts which have just been made are not to be in vain. They would therefore be grateful to lean whether the United States Government would be prepared to speak to the Jewish Agency in terms parallel to those the British representations to the Arabs (12)

9. It is the hope of the British Government that, as a result of this information, given frankly and in the spirit of the recent talks, the United States Government will share their view that it would be dangerous to underrate Arab resentment. The British Government believe it to be most urgent that, in the common interests of both countries, all possible steps should be taken by the United States Government, not only to reassure the Arabs, but also the Jews, even though it means the exercise by the latter of considerable restraint, to make good I deeds their words of friendship to the Arabs.

Washington, 5th January, 1948.”

1. Continued from Foreign Relations, 1947, V, PP. 999-1328
2. Ernest Bevin, British Secretary of State for Foreign Affair
3. For British memorandum of this conversation, see Foreign Relations, 1947, vol.v.1312
4. On November 29, 1947 the General Assembly had adopted 181 (11) recommending the partition of Palestine into Arab and Jewish state; for the text of the Resolution see the appendix, p. 1709
Two maps illustrating the boundaries proposed in Resolution 181 (11) are reproduced facing p. 1730. They are respectively entitled “Palestine – Plan of Partition with Economic Union” (United Nations Map No. 103 (b), November 1947); and “City of Jerusalem – Boundaries proposed” (United Nations Map No. 104, November 1947)
5. For documentation on Anglo-American talks in October 1947 concerning the Middle East and the Eastern Mediterranean, see Foreign Relation, 1947, v. PP. ff
6. The persons mentioned were Prime Ministers of their respective countries.
7. Acting Foreign Minister of Saudi Arabia.
8. At the United Nations.
9. See Part 1 of this volume, pp. 202 ff. and editorial note, p.85
10. Iraqi Prime Minister
11. Nuri as-Said, Iraqi political leader and many times Prime Minister.
12. Marginal notation by Loy. W. Handerson, Director of the Office of Near Eastern and African Affairs: “We are doing so on every appropriate occasion.”

SOURCE: INTEREST OF THE UNITED STATES IN THE ARAB-ISRAEL CONTROVERSY OVER THE FUTURE STATUS OF PALESTINE; THE ISSUE AT THE UNITED NATIONS (1): CREATION OF THE STATE OF ISRAEL; ENTRY OF ARAB FORCES INTO PALESTINE, Foreign Relations, 1848, Volume V, pp. 533-537

 
1. Never forget, it is 1948. After six decades, the main actors are the same and Muslim Palestine is still under occupation.
2. All material posted on the Muslimmediany.org is free. Please give the reference of Muslimmediany.org when any material is used
3. The main purpose of the Muslimmediany.org is to give the original sources to the readers and writers to be quoted again and again
/////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////
Part 3. Nehru against the Mao Revolution
(U.S. secret documents and Truman-Nehru closet relations) posted 02/18/2011

Highlights
- Chinese Ambassador here has had repeated to him a wire sent several days ago by Chinese Ambassador in Moscow to Nanking. He regarded it of such importance that he requested permission of Nanking to communicate to me its contents. Nanking left matter to his discretion and he has just given me what I quote in following paragraph. Source of information of Chinese Ambassador in Moscow is Indian Ambassador with whom he seems to frequent confidential conferences… (The U.S. Ambassador in India Grady to the Secretary of State)
- Molotove has expressed to Mme. Pandit on several occasions that world is divided in two great camps, the democratic and the imperialistic and it is now up to India decide which side she is going to take. Soviet Russia has been disappointed by the indecision of the Indian attitude … (The U.S. Ambassador in India Grady to the Secretary of State)
- There are regular meetings of the British Ambassador in Moscow with representatives there of Dominions. Recently at a meeting Ambassador told Dominions representatives that relations between Soviet Russia and countries of western Europe have become more and more seriously strained. He hoped that Dominions would make up their minds as to their policy toward Russia at the earliest possible time and make their attitude clear to him… (The U.S. Ambassador in India Grady to the Secretary of State)
- All of the information contained in above throws  new light on Nehru’s recent foreign policy speech . It would seem that he may have been answering Russia through the medium of general policy statement. It is to be noted that he said India was not afraid of military might of any great power and the Assembly cheered him… (The U.S. Ambassador in India Grady to the Secretary of State)

Jafar Syed
M.A. LL.B.
Researcher – International Affairs
New York

It is 1948. Top secret Telegram of U.S. Ambassador in India Grady highlights the following facts
- Nehru is against the Mao Revolution. He has closes ties with the anti-Revolution leadership.  Pre-Mao Chinese ambassador and U.S. ambassador share the information provided by U.S. spy Bharti Ambassador Lakshmi Pandit in the Soviet Union
- Stalin does not know that Nehru has already joined the imperialist camp led by America
- Occupying power Britain is coercing the “dominions” to join the imperialist camp.
- Nehru targets Soviet Russia in his March 8 speech.

Contents of the top secret telegram 221

“845.00/3-1848: Telegram
“The Ambassador in India (Grady) to the Secretary of State

“Top Secret  New Delhi, March 18, 1848 – 4 p.m.

“ 221. Chinese Ambassador here has had repeated to him a wire sent several days ago by Chinese Ambassador in Moscow to Nanking. He regarded it  of such importance that he requested permission of Nanking to communicate to me its contents. Nanking left matter to his discretion and he has just given me what I quote in following paragraph. Source of information of Chinese Ambassador in Moscow is Indian Ambassador with whom he seems to frequent confidential conferences.  In giving me this information Chinese Ambassador here felt deeply concerned lest either Chinese or Indian Ambassador in Moscow should know that he had passed this along information of U.S.
1. Molotove (1) has expressed to Mme. Pandit (2) on several occasions that world is divided in two great camps, the democratic and the imperialistic and it is now up to India decide which side she is going to take. Soviet Russia has been ‘disappointed by the indecision of the Indian attitude.’ She reports that now Soviet Press has begun to attack Inida.
“2. After his arrival in Delhi Soviet Ambassador did not make serious attempts to get in contact with responsible leaders of government, but directed clandestinely secret movements of India Communists. This aroused great indignation among the people of Congress. Some of the Congress leaders even suggested that Pundit should be recalled.
“3. There are regular meetings of the British Ambassador in Moscow with representatives there of Dominions. Recently at a meeting Ambassador told Dominions representatives that relations between Soviet Russia and countries of western Europe have become more and more seriously strained. He hoped that Dominions would make up their minds as to their policy toward Russia at the earliest possible time and make their attitude clear to him.”

“Chinese Ambassador stated that he had also learned from same source that Molotov had urged Pandit to request GOI to exchange diplomatic representation with Yugoslavia, Poland and other countries of eastern Europe.  She replied that her government lacked personal to do this.
 “All of the information contained in above throws  new light on Nehru’s recent foreign police speech (3). It would seem that he may have been answering Russia through the medium of general policy statement. It is to be noted that he said India was not afraid of military might of any great power and the Assembly cheered him. He also stated that India did not intend to increase her representation abroad.

Am endeavoring to get information here to substantiate what has been said regarding activities of Soviet Ambassador to India and shall report promptly any information I can obtain.”

Sent Department as 221, repeated Moscow as 2.
Department please repeat London as 56. 
       
                         GARDY
(1) Vyacheslav Mikhailovich Molotov
(2) Vijaya Lakshmi Pandit, Indian Ambassador in the Soviet Union
(3) The reference here is presumably to a speech on March 8 by Indian Prime Minister Pandit Jawaharlal Nehru, before the Constitutional Assembly in New Delhi. For text entitled “India Keeps Out of Power Block,” see Dorothy Norman (ed), Nehru, The First Sixty Years, vol.11,  pp. 380-386)
/////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////
Part 2. Israel after Mubarak
(‘Peace treaty’ with Israel is over … Dr. Ayman Nur) Posted 02/16/2011

Jafar Syed

M.A. LL.B.                                                   

Researcher – International Affairs

New York

Will the Egyptians patriotic forces that triggered the fall of Muhammad Hosni Sayyid Mubarak end the shameful ‘Peace treaty’ with European Jewish occupiers of the Muslim Palestine?

It is an open question at this moment.

When the military leadership is promising to honor its international obligations, some voices are demanding the re-negotiation of the treaty.

One of these voices is Dr. Ayman Nur, leader of the Tomorrow Party. Jewish Daily Haaretz labeled Dr. Nur as “secular liberal.”
“A leader of Egypt's secular opposition declared Sunday that the country's 30-year peace treaty with Israel was over, despite assurances by the new military rulers that it would honor the accord in the wake of President Hosni Mubarak's resignation.

“Nur is not a member of the radical Muslim Brotherhood, but rather a secular liberal. His remarks contradicted the military's statement on Saturday reassuring its international allies that there would be no break in its peace deal with Israel.”
“Israel's defense minister, Ehud Barak, voiced confidence in the military's intention on Sunday when he told ABC that he did not think the relationship between Israel and Egypt is under any risk or that there is any kind of operational risk awaiting us.”
Importance of the “peace treaty”
If European Jewish occupiers of the Muslim Palestine still occupy the Muslim Palestine, this “Peace treaty” played an important role in the continued occupation of the Muslim Palestine. This “peace treaty’ is solely responsible for every aggression committed by the European Jewish occupiers of the Muslim Palestine in the region. This “peace treaty” is solely responsible for the aggression against Palestinians, Lebanese, and attacks on Iraqis and Syrians nuclear facilities. Never forget the massacres of Sabra Shatlia and Jenin.

Note what the European Jewish occupiers of Muslim Palestine got from this so called “peace treaty.” It was not a peace treaty. In fact, traitor Muhammad Anwar al Sadat sold eighty million brave Egyptians in 1978. It legitimized the naked occupation of Muslim Palestine by the European Jewish occupiers.

“It was the first time that the vast stretch of territory from the headwaters of the Jordan to the sources of the Nile had become an area of peace; that the only land link between Africa and Asia – the Sinai desert, so long a barrier – had been transformed into a bridge; that Cairo became the nearest capital accessible to Jerusalem. It was the first time that Israel had breached the wall of regional segregation and attained Arab recognition of its sovereign legitimacy; and the first time that the cry of battle had given way to the vow of ‘no more war.’

“This solemn pledge, pronounced in Jerusalem by the President of Egypt and the Prime Minister of Israel, became the foundation stone of the first edifice of Arab-Israel peace. It is now a commitment by the people of Egypt and Israel from which they cannot retreat, because the road of return would lead them into the abyss. (Israel after Mubarak No. 1, Muslimdailyny.org).

Since 1978, Muslim could never present a united front against the European Jewish occupiers of the Muslim Palestine.

“By talking Israel and Egypt under the American wing in the 1970s, the U.S. cemented a pro-Western balance of power in the region, making another all out, multi-front Arab-Israel war an extremely remote possibility. (Jonathan Rynhold, Strategic Foundation Falter, Obama’s policy toward Egypt endangers regional stability, Jewish Sentinel, February 11-17, 2011.

Note of caution: Never believe that Jewish Berry Obama will do anything anti-Jewish. He is president because Jews wanted it. Remember the propagated difference between Jewish Berry Obama and Jewish top dog Yahu. Phrase borrowed from Jihad Watch.

“As Prime Minister Netanyahu indicated in his speech, the bond between the United States and Israel is unbreakable.  It encompasses our national security interests, our strategic interests, but most importantly, the bond of two democracies who share a common set of values and whose people have grown closer and closer as time goes on.
“Finally, we discussed issues that arose out of the Nuclear Nonproliferation Conference.  And I reiterated to the Prime Minister that there is no change in U.S. policy when it comes to these issues.  We strongly believe that, given its size, its history, the region that it’s in, and the threats that are leveled against us -- against it, that Israel has unique security requirements.  It’s got to be able to respond to threats or any combination of threats in the region.  And that's why we remain unwavering in our commitment to Israel’s security.  And the United States will never ask Israel to take any steps that would undermine their security interests.”
 “So I just want to say once again that I thought the discussion that we had was excellent.  We’ve seen over the last year how our relationship has broadened.  Sometimes it doesn’t get publicized, but on a whole range of issues -- economic, military-to-military, issues related to Israel maintaining its qualitative military edge, intelligence-sharing, how we are able to work together effectively on the international front -- that in fact our relationship is continuing to improve.  And I think a lot of that has to do with the excellent work that the Prime Minister has done.  So I’m grateful.” (Obama: Jews have the divine right to nuke the world. Israel is the 51 state of the United State. United State is Israel, Muslimdailyny.org)
///////////////////////////////////////////////////////////
Part 1. Israel after Mubarak?
(Bashar Assad to be incorporated in the Jewish world-wide empire) Posted 02/13/2010

Highlights
- Without Egypt, Israel will be left with no friends in Mideast (Jewish Harretz)
- Without Egypt's Mubarak and with relations with Turkey in shambles, Israel will be forced to court new potential allies (Jewish Harretz)
- Assad and Netanyahu will be left to safeguard the old order of the Middle East (Jewish Harretz)
- Occupied Muslim World must not fell into the trap of Jewish or Brahmin color peace. Note what ‘peace” is to Carter. “So, the first prerequisite of a lasting peace is the recognition of Israel by her neighbors …Carter ... muslimdailyny.org
- Divine right of chosen Jews to have nukes.  “Israel has nuclear warheads aimed at 68-70 different cities in the world, including cities in every Arab country in the Middle East. Israel also have 200 atomic mines - even more than Britain – located in holes on the Golan Heights. These mines have been prepared to counter a Syrian invasion of the Golan. (Why is P.M. Rabin Afraid? Israel’s nukes ready for action. Could wipe out all enemy countries, The Jewish Press, February 10, 1994)
- Jewish Thomas Friedman slaps Egyptian nations. “Egypt and really most of the Arab world has been on vacation from history for the last 50 years thanks largely to oil.  Egypt didn’t have oil, it had the peace treaty with Israel.  What peace with Israel was with Egypt, oil is for Saudi Arabia.  It got Egypt all this aid, it allowed the regime to move slowly on democratization, and now it has to play rapid catch up.” - Thomas Friedman on Meet the Press, 1.30.11(staff.lsrhs.net/~graceda/DavidGraceOnTheWeb/Egypt.html)
- New York Jewish vote and head of Ibn Saud on a platter … Muslimdailyny.org
- World has been witnessing the constant struggle between the patriotic forces of the Muslim Middle East and Muslim pimps like Shah of Iran, Mubarak and Jordanian ruling dynasty who were hired by the anti-Muslim Christian America to maintain the occupation of Muslim Palestine by the European Jews
- The friendship between Mubarak and Netanyahu is based on a mutual fear (Jewish Harretz)
- Note what type of honest broker anti-Muslim Christian ruling elite is. Map of ethnic cleansing drawn by an American president. “I actually would put a barbed wire around Palestine, and I would begin to move the Arabs out. (Israel in the mind of America)
- “Anti-Muslim Christians” phrase is borrowed from Jewish-hired junkyard dog Bill’O Reilly. (Christians murder millions of Vietnames, Iraqis, and Afghans, muslimdailyny.org, updated 11/18/2010)

Jafar Syed
M.A., LL.B.
Researcher – International Affairs
New York

In the Middle East and beyond, toppling of any stooge of anti-Muslim “Christian” America, anti-Muslim “Christian” Great Britain, and anti-Muslim “Christian France” leaves European Jewish occupiers of Muslim Palestine without a regional traitor. First blow came in 1952 when patriotic forces toppled Shah Farooq of Egypt.  Next blow came in 1958 when patriotic forces ousted Nuri in Iraq. Third blow came when patriotic forces ousted France from Algeria in 1962. Fourth blow came in 1979 when patriotic forces ousted Shah of Iran. In addition, patriotic forces became a political factor in Turkey and Lebanon. Latest blow came few days ago when patriotic forces humiliated Muhammad Hosni Sayyid Mubarak. 

World has been witnessing the constant struggle between the patriotic forces of the Muslim Middle East and Muslim pimps like Shah of Iran, Mubarak and Jordanian ruling dynasty who were hired by the anti-Muslim Christian America to maintain the occupation of Muslim Palestine by the European Jews. Whenever patriotic forces came to power, anti-Muslim Christian America demonized, contained, and eliminated them. Note the demonization of Gamal Abdel Nasser Hussein, destruction of Egypt, and eventual elimination of Nasser  through medical murder. Note the demonization of the leaders of the Iraqi revolution of 1958 and occupation of Iraq. Note the demonization of the leaders of Iranian revolution and containment and destruction of Iran since 1979.

Revolution of Egypt and Iraq were demonized as pro-Russian whereas Iranian revolution was demonized as “Islamic.”

These three revolutions have one common factor. They were against the occupation of Muslim Palestine by the European Jews. Besides other factor, only this factor was enough to demonize and to torpedo these revolutions by the American ruling elite which is ruled by the Jews.

Proof?

“The only thing which will matter in Washington … is if the people in the Bronx and Brownsville and Borough Park begin to mutter in their breads, they’ll be damned if they continue to cast their votes to a party that breaks its pledges to them … You let me have the Jewish vote of New York and I will bring you the head of Ibn Saud on a platter! The administration will sell all seven Arabs states if it is question of retaining the support … of the Jews of New York alone; never mind the rest of the country. (Jewish statesman Bernard Mannes Baruch, Israel in the Mind of America, P. 175)

Why the America-hired Muslim pimps sided with the European Jewish occupiers of the Muslim Palestine? Answer is very simple. Lust of power. This is one of the characteristic of any traitor leader. He will sell his nation to remain in power.

History of the Muslim Middle East would have been different if these traitors had not sold their nations. They provided safety belts for the European Jewish occupiers of Muslim Palestine. They stood against the patriotic forces and patriotic leaders who wanted to eliminate the European Jewish occupiers of Muslim Palestine. They stood against the wishes of the masses who wanted to side with their occupied Palestinian brothers.

If the European Jewish occupiers still occupy the Muslim Palestine, the Muslim pimps of the Muslim world are to be blamed.

Proof? .

“It was the first time that the vast stretch of territory from the headwaters of the Jordan to the sources of the Nile had become an area of peace; that the only land link between Africa and Asia – the Sinai desert, so long a barrier – had been transformed into a bridge; that Cairo became the nearest capital accessible to Jerusalem. It was the first time that Israel had breached the wall of regional segregation and attained Arab recognition of its sovereign legitimacy; and the first time that the cry of battle had given way to the vow of ‘no more war’.

“This solemn pledge, pronounced in Jerusalem by the President of Egypt and the Prime Minister of Israel, became the foundation stone of the first edifice of Arab-Israel peace. It is now a commitment by the people of Egypt and Israel from which they cannot retreat, because the road of return would lead them into the abyss. (Gideon Rafael, Destination Peace, P. x-xi)

European Jewish occupiers reaped these benefits when traitor Muhammad Anwar al Sadat sold the brave Egyptian nation of 80 millions in 1978. It was not peace. It was a selling of an occupied nation down the river.
 
Note how the European Jewish occupiers view the treacherous acts of the Muslims pimps.

Safety belts for the European Jewish occupiers of Muslim Palestine

To cushion the blows of the patriotic forces of the Muslim World, anti-Muslim Christian America created a safety belt for the Jewish occupiers of the Muslim Palestine by renting the Muslim pimps.

Meet three of the American-hired pro-Jewish Muslim pimps of the Muslim World.

1. Jewish Muslim pimp - Shah of Iran 1953-1979. Betraying the cause of occupied Muslim Palestinians for 26 long years.  

Could Shah of Iran remain in power without the protection of America? Answer is no. Could Shah of Iran remain in power without betraying the cause of occupied Palestinians? Answer is again no. Americans even brought him back through a covert action when patriotic forces kicked him out of Iran. He paid the price by becoming the America’s stooge in the region and the protector of Jewish occupiers of Palestine. Note how he served the Jewish occupiers of Muslim Palestine. He gave the Jewish occupiers of Muslim Palestine oil and money. In addition, he joined them on military and intelligence front.
“After Israel's war against Egypt in 1956, David Ben-Gurion attempted to establish alliances with non-Arab countries in the region, including Iran, Turkey, and Ethiopia. The Shah of Iran became a significant ally of Israel, supplying the country with oil and money from weapons purchases. The countries' militaries and intelligence agencies worked on joint operations against Egyptian President Gamal Abdel Nasser's rule, which was seen as the main threat against Israel and pro-Western Arab governments. (Aluf Benn, Without Egypt, Israel will be left with no friends in Mideast, Harretz, 01/29/2011)

Shameful role of Shah of Iran did not end with the medical murder of Gamal Abdel Nasser Hussain (1956-1970). Shah of Iran continued to be the stooge of America and Jewish occupiers of Muslim Palestine until 1979 when patriotic forces kicked him again from Iran.
2. Jewish Muslim pimp - Jordanian King Hussein and his son betraying the cause of occupied Muslim Palestinians for sixty three long years.

No ruler bordering European Jewish occupiers has done more harm to the cause of occupied Palestinians than Jordanian ruling elite. It forged secret alliance with the European Jewish occupier of Palestine. Even to day, it is carrying the Jewish water.
“Israel's next alliances were forged with Jordan's King Hussein and Morocco's King Hassan. These ties were operated in secret, as well as ties with leaders in Lebanon's Christian community. The late 1970s saw the fall of the Shah of Iran, with an anti-Israel Islamic republic created in his stead.
“Now, with Mubarak struggling over the survival of his government, [article written before the ouster of Mubarak] Israel is left with two strategic allies in the region: Jordan and the Palestinian Authority. These two allies promise to strengthen Israel's Eastern battlefront and are also working to stop terror attacks and slow down Hamas.
“But Israel's relationship with these two allies is complicated. Joint security exercises are modest and the relationship between the leaders is poor. Jordan's King Abdullah refuses to meet Netanyahu, and Palestinian President Mahmoud Abbas is waging a diplomatic struggle against Israel's right-wing government. It's hard to tell how Jordan and the PA could fill the role that Egypt has played for Israel. (Aluf Benn, Without Egypt, Israel will be left with no friends in Mideast, Harretz, 01/29/2011)
3. Jewish Muslim pimp – Muhammad Hosni Sayyid Mubarak betraying the cause of occupied Muslim Palestinians for 30 long years.

This shameless beast called Mubarak has been witnessing and has been collaborating to every murderous act of European Jewish murderers since 1981. He was also there when European Jewish murderers unleashed terrorist dogs on the helpless civilians of Sabra and Shatila in September 16-18, 1982.  He has no shame for inviting a murderer like Natanyahu twice to the sacred soil of Egypt.

“Mubarak inherited the peace agreement after President Anwar Sadat's assassination. Mubarak was cold in his public relations with Israel, refusing to visit the country except for Yitzhak Rabin's funeral, which decelerated normalization between the countries.

“Relations between the Israel Defense Forces and the Egyptian army were conducted on a low level, with no joint exercises. Egyptian public opinion was openly hostile towards Israel and anti-Semitic terminology was common. Civil relations between the countries were carried out by a handful of government workers and businessmen.

“Despite all of this, the "cold peace" with Egypt was the most important strategic alliance Israel had in the Middle East. The security provided by the alliance gave Israel the chance to concentrate its forces on the northern front and around the settlements. Starting in 1985, peace with Egypt allowed for Israel to cut its defense budget, which greatly benefited the economy.

Mubarak became president while Israel was governed by Menachim Begin, and has worked with eight different Israeli leaders since then. He had close relations with Yitzhak Rabin and Benjamin Netanyahu. In the last two years, despite a stagnation in peace talks between Israel and the Palestinians and worsening relations between Netanyahu and the Arab world, Mubarak has hosted the prime minister both in Cairo and in Sharm el-Sheikh.

“The friendship between Mubarak and Netanyahu is based on a mutual fear over Iran's strengthening and the rising power of Islamists, as well as over the weakening and distancing of the U.S. government with Barack Obama at its head. (Aluf Benn, Without Egypt, Israel will be left with no friends in Mideast, Harretz, 01/29/2011)

Even before the end of shameful rule of Mubarak, Anti-Muslim Christian America is in search of another stooge. Guess, who is future intended stooge? He is Bashar Assad.

“In this situation, Israel will be forced to seek out new allies. The natural candidates include Syria, which is striving to exploit Egypt's weakness to claim a place among the key nations in the region.

“The images from Cairo and Tunisia surely send chills down the backs of Syrian President Bashar Assad and his cronies, despite the achievement they achieved with the new Hezbollah-backed Lebanon government. As long as the Arab world is flooded with waves of angry anti-government protests, Assad and Netanyahu will be left to safeguard the old order of the Middle East. (Aluf Benn, Without Egypt, Israel will be left with no friends in Mideast, Harretz, 01/29/2011)

Last Word. 1. Muslim of the world must not fell into the trap of peace. It is legitimization of occupation. Note Carter view of peace. In essence, it is occupation of Muslim Palestine by the European Jews forever. No American president has protected the European Jewish occupation of Muslim Palestine than Carter. He recruited Muhammad Anwar al Sadat. It sealed the fate of occupied Palestinians forever perhaps. Jewish anti-Carter propaganda is to muffle the truth. Read the statement of Jewish Thomas Friedman.

“So, the first prerequisite of a lasting peace is the recognition of Israel by her neighbors, Israel's right to exist, Israel's right to exist permanently, Israel's right to exist in peace. That means that over a period of months or years that the borders between Israel and Syria, Israel and Lebanon, Israel and Jordan, Israel and Egypt must be opened up to travel, to tourism, to cultural, exchange, to trade, so that no matter who the leaders might be in those countries, the people themselves will have formed a mutual understanding and comprehension and a sense of a common purpose to avoid the repetitious wars and death that have afflicted that region so long. That's the first prerequisite of peace.
(Town meeting in Clinton, Massachusetts. March 16, 1977, Jewish virtual Library, A Division of the Americans Israeli cooperative enterprise, accessed on 2/13/201)

2. Note what type of honest broker anti-Muslim Christian ruling elite is. Map of ethnic cleansing drawn by an American president.

“I actually would put a barbed wire around Palestine, and I would begin to move the Arabs out … I would provide land for the Arabs in some other part of the Middle East … Each time we move out an Arab we would bring in another Jewish family … But I don’t want to bring in more than they can economically support … It would be an independent nation just like any other nation … Naturally, if there are 90% Jews, the Jews would dominate the government … There are lots of places to which you could move the Arabs. All you have to do is drill a well, because there is this large underground water supply, and we can move the Arabs to places where they can really live. ( Peter Grose, Israel in the mind of America, P. 140)
//////////////////////////////////////////////////////////
Part 4. Nehru commits to wage war against Russia as an ally in 1948
(U.S. Secret documents and Truman Nehru closet relations) Posted 01/21/2011

Highlights
- At his request I saw last evening H. V. R. Iengar, Acting Secretary General External Affairs in Bajpai’s absence. Prime Minister wished him to discuss with me recent statement on foreign policy which Prime Minister made in Assembly. Prime Minister wanted to be sure US did not misunderstand what he was endeavoring to convey. The speech he said was primarily for home consumption and to say certain things to Russia which he felt should be said (The US Ambassador in India Grady to the Secretary of State)
- He said [Iengar] that it was unthinkable that India should be on Russia’s side in event of conflict between Russia and US (The US Ambassador in India Grady to the Secretary of State)
- American principles of democracy and those of India were identical H. V. R. Iengar, Acting Secretary General External Affairs in Bajpai’s absence.
- He [Nehru] wishes to maintain officially for his government a neutral position. I [Grady] said that I did not see any objection to this policy but found it hard to understand the Prime Minister’s frequent reference to imperialism (The US Ambassador in India Grady to the Secretary of State)
- He [Iengar] stated further that Prime Minister is concerned about spread of Communism in India and said very confidentially measures are being taken to eliminate Communist from government (The US Ambassador in India Grady to the Secretary of State)
- He [Iengar] also stated that their military intelligence which was completely disorganized and in effect nonexistent last August is now being well organized and is giving careful attention to northern border” (The US Ambassador in India Grady to the Secretary of State)
  
Jafar Syed
M.A., LL.B.
Researcher-International Affairs
New York

It is 1948. Secret Telegram of US Ambassador in India Grady highlights the following facts.
- Is it duplicity, hypocrisy, or fraud? Nehru makes a speech in the Assembly. After making it, gives clarifications. Does Nehru play the same dirty trick with the Russians?
-  Nehru commits to wage war against Soviet Union as US ally in 1948
- Nehru gives the reason why Bharat is in the pocket of America. Both are “democracies.”
- Nehru does not want that veil of neutrality may be lifted from his face
- Nehru starts cleansing Communist from the government
- Military intelligence starts its activities in the North
- Nehru is hell-bent to prove to the Americans that he is in their pocket. To prove this fact he gives these reasons. 1. Ideological identification 2. Commitment to side with America against Soviet Union 3. Actions against Bharti communists 4. Request to keep the neutrality veil 5. Justification of any word which is thought to be anti-America
 
Contents of the secret telegram
 
“225. Re Embdesp 237 March 6. (1) At his request I saw last evening H. V. R. Iengar, Acting Secretary General External Affairs in Bajpai’s absence. Prime Minister wished him to discuss with me recent statement on foreign policy which Prime Minister made in Assembly. Prime Minister wanted to be sure US did not misunderstand what he was endeavoring to convey. The speech he said was primarily for home consumption and to say certain things to Russia which he felt should be said. He said that it was unthinkable that India should be on Russia’s side in even of between Russia and US. American principles of democracy and those of India were identical. He wishes to maintain officially for his government a neutral position. I said that I did not see any objection to this policy but found it hard to understand the Prime Minister’s frequent reference to imperialism and that I had heard from reliable sources that Prime Minister had been critical of our government and of America. Iengar said that as one who had been intimately associated with the Prime Minister for long time he found it hard to believe this as Prime Minister never criticized America to him. Iengar stated that Prime Minister had been disappointed in our attitude on Kashmir at UN (2) but that there was no question about his fundamental friendliness to US. He stated further that Prime Minister is concerned about spread of Communism in India and said very confidentially measures are being taken to eliminate Communist from government.

“ He also stated that their military intelligence which was completely disorganized and in effect nonexistent last August is now being well organized and is giving careful attention to northern border. He stated further that resolution introduced in SC by Dr. Tsiang (3) had been considered by Prime Minister and his advisers several days ago and met with their approval.

“I learned from reliable sources that Patel (4) is not expected to recover. He has had two heart attacks and
has cirrhosis of liver.

“State Department as 225, repeated Karachi as 73. Department please repeat London and Moscow if considered desirable.
   GRADY
Notes:
1. Re Embdesp 237 March 6. (1) not printed
2. For documentation on U.S. involvement in the dispute between India and Pakistan over Kashmir, brought before the U.N. Security Council in January, 1948, see pp. 265 ff.
3. Resolution on Kashmir dispute, introduced on March 18 by the Chinese Representative on the Security Council, Tsiang. For test, see United  Nations, Official Records of the Security Council, Third Year, Supplement for January, February and March 1948,pp. 38-40.
4. Vallabhbhai Patel, India Minister for States, Home Affairs, Information and Broadcasting.
/////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////
Part 2. Truman slaps Pakistan with first arms embargo
(U.S. Secret documents and Truman-Nehru closet relations) Posted 01/20/2011

Highlights
  
- Friend like America? Truman slaps Pakistan with first arms embargo in 1948
- Transparent America? Truman does not tell the world that he is imposing arms embargo. “It is not proposed to establish a formal embargo with the publicity which such action would entail.” Secretary of State G. C. Marshall  
- Truman does not stand for the occupied Kashmiris against the occupier Bharat. Truman administration views naked occupation of Kashmir by Bharat as a dispute between two countries. Secretary of State referred to the occupation of Kashmir by Bharat as a dispute. It was not a dispute as stated by the Secretary of State. It was a naked Bharti occupation. The use of word dispute tells volumes about the attitude of Truman administration about the occupation of Kashmir.  “The forgoing policy is consistent with the attitude taken by this Government in the deliberations on the India-Pakistan question in the Security Council of the United Nation, in that United States representatives has emphasized that the dispute between the parties should be settled by pacific means.”  Secretary of State G. C. Marshall  
 

Note no. 1. In 1948, America’s lackeys still rule China. The People’s Republic of China was formally established on October 1, 1949. The Soviet Union recognized it on October 2, 1949

Jafar Syed
M.A. LL.B.
Researcher – International Affairs
New York

It is 1948. Memorandum by the Secretary of State to President Truman highlights the following facts.

- American was never a friend of Pakistan. Truman slaps Pakistan with first arms embargo in 1948. He knows that Pakistan is vulnerable to Nehru’s aggression against Pakistan. He knows that the military imbalance between India and Pakistan. He knows that arms embargo will make Pakistan a sitting duck against the Bharti aggression. He knows that arms embargo against Bharat would have no effect on the Bharti machine of death and destruction, military
- America is the most secretive country in the world. Its claims of transparency are skin-deep. Truman does not tell the world that he is slaping wit Arms embargo. It is kept secret from the world, and even Truman does not inform Americans
- America does not stand for the occupied Kashmiris against the occupier Bharat. When it talks about peace and commitment to peace, it is actually endorsing the occupation of Kashmir by Bharat

Contents of confidential document 845.24/3-1148.

“845.24/3-1148

“Memorandum by the Secretary of State to President Truman

“CONFIDENTIAL  WASHINGTON, March   11, 1948

“Subject: Suspension of Export of Arms, Ammunition, and Other Military Material to India and Pakistan

“The department has recently been approached by representatives of India and Pakistan with a view to the purchase and export to these countries of military material requiring export licensing. It is expected that India and Pakistan will make further request of this nature in the future.
“Careful consideration has been given by the appropriate officials of the Department to the advisability of allowing military materials to be shipped to India and Pakistan at this time, and the tentative conclusions has been reached that in view of the tense situation prevailing in the Indian subcontinent as a result of dispute over Kashmir and other issues, which each party has declared to constitute threats to international peace, licenses  should not be issued for the export of military material to either India or Pakistan until the situation becomes more clarified. The department further believes that a comparable policy should be adopted with regard to transfer, retransfer, and sales of military items under the control of the Office of the Foreign Liquidation Commission insofar as India and Pakistan are concerned, unless evidence is produced to show that such material are intended for civilian or commercial use in India  and Pakistan. It is not proposed to establish a formal embargo with the publicity which such action would entail.

“The forgoing policy is consistent with the attitude taken by this Government in the deliberations on the India-Pakistan question in the Security Council of the United Nation, in that United States representatives has emphasized that the dispute between the parties should be settled by pacific means.

“The Secretary of Defense has concurred in this recommendation. It would be appreciated if you would indicate whether you agree with the foregoing policy. 1

      G.C. MARSHALL
1. A marginal notation on this memorandum reads: “Approved, Harry S. Truman, March 12, 1948.”
/////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////
Part 1. Truman-Nehru trap besieged Pakistan
(U.S. secret documents and Truman-Nehru closet relations) Updated 01/18/2011  

Highlights

- Truman traps Pakistan: Financial aid to Pakistan is conditional … US Charge in India Donovan
- Veil of neutrality must no be lifted: Nehru reluctant to forge any ties with America publically to play the neutrality ball
- Zardari friend of Bharat should know: Nehru is against any American “aid” to Pakistan even in 1948
- International repercussion: Any assistance to Pakistan will jeopardize US-Bharat relations … US Charge in India Donovan
- Nehru uses Kashmir tragedy to starve Pakistani financially: Refuse to pay agreed upon Pakistan’s share of cash balance of undivided Bharat … US Charge in India Donovan
- Nehru coerced Hyderabad: Nehru coerced Hyderabad for extending loan to Pakistan … US Charge in India Donovan
- Always Bharat is first, Pakistan go to hell: Bharat must be consulted before any financial aid is given to Pakistan. If aid is given to Pakistan, Bharat might demand  similar aid  … US Charge in India Donovan
- Three key players. 1. General Secretary Joseph Vissarionovich Stalin, 1922- 1953. 2. President Harry S. Truman, 1945-1953 2. Prime Minister Jawahar Lal Nehru, 1947-1964

Jafar Syed
M.A., LL.B.
Researcher – International Affairs
New York

It is 1948. Telegram of U.S. Charge’ Donovan in Bharat to U.S. Secretary of State highlights the following facts.

1. There is no free lunch in American vocabulary. So-called financial aid to Pakistan is a trap to drag Pakistan into a treaty of “friendship, commerce, and navigation.”
2. To play the neutrality ball, Nehru is reluctant to establish any type of ties with America publicly. Why? After establishing ties with America, Nehru cannot claim the champion of the oppressed and occupied world - Africa, Asia and Latin America. Second, he cannot fool Stalin that he is with him. Third, he cannot play the Russian card with Truman. He wants to keep the door open to blackmail both Truman and Stalin. Fourth, after establishing ties with Truman openly, Nehru cannot claim that he is neutral.
3.  Nehru proves his anti-Pakistan enmity by making it clear that any financial assistance to Pakistan is unacceptable. And if Pakistan is financially assisted, it will adversely affect Bharat-US relations. In addition, it will have international implications
4. Nehru refuses to pay united Bharat’s agreed upon Pakistan’s share of cash.  He claims that Pakistan will use this cash to assist “raiders.” In 1948, freedom fighters were called “raiders” and not terrorist by the occupying power Bharat
5. For Nehru, Hyderabad loan to Pakistan is an act against Bharat
6. Charge’ in Bharat Donovan advises US Secretary of State that Bharat must be consulted before any financial aid is given to Pakistan. If any aid is given to Pakistan, Bharat might demand  similar aid 

Contents of the secret document No. 71.

Subject: India’s Reaction to Financial Aid to Pakistan

“SIR: I have the honor to refer to secret dispatch no, 21 from the American Embassy, dated January 13, 1948, [not printed] suggesting that consideration to be given to providing some financial aid to Pakistan in connection with negotiations with that country of a treaty of friendship, commerce and navigation.

“The difficulty of proceeding with negotiations except on such a basis is fully appreciated. The situation is somewhat similar here, except that the Government of India has not asked for a loan. India, as in the case of Pakistan, is not in a position at this time to avail itself of many of the mutual benefits to be derived from a treaty of friendship, commerce and navigation with the United States and has shown no eagerness to begin discussions of such a treaty.

“It is hardly necessary to point out, however, that any financial aid given by the United States to Pakistan so long as relations between India and Pakistan continue to be strained, would be regarded by India as an unfriendly act. It not only would prejudice the prospects of negotiating a treaty of friendship, commerce and navigation with India, but also would have an adverse effect on all aspects of United States relations with India and possibly even more far reaching international repercussions. In this connection, attention is called to the recent dispute between India and Pakistan over the cash balances of the former undivided Government of India. India feared that if it paid Pakistan the remaining share of the balances due to the latter under their financial agreement, the money would be used to support the raiders in Kashmir against India. Hyderabad’s recent loan to Pakistan was regarded somewhat in the light of an alliance against India (Embassy’s reports nos. 276 of January 2, 1948, 4 of January 9, 1948, and 1948, and 10 of January 16, 1948; despatch no.32 of January 9, 1948; and telegrams nos. 39 and 41 of January 13, 1948) [not printed]


“Financial aid to Pakistan might be viewed differently if India were informally approached in advance and the aid were extended in such a way that it could be directed only toward economic ends. However, in such circumstances, India might demand similar aid. Respectfully yours,    Howard Donovan”

1 not printed.
2. Reports, dispatch, and telegrams not printed.
(Source of the document:  US. Foreign Relations, 1948, Volume V, Page 495-496. Document: 711.45/1-2648. The Charge in India (Denovan, to the Secretary of State. Secret: No. 71. New Delhi, January 26, 1948. Chapter India.    Discussion between the United States and India Concerning India attitudes toward the United States and the Soviet Union, and Indian requests for financial and military aid)

///////////////////////////////////////////////////////////
Murderer Jared Lee Loughner is a Jew: If he was a Muslim? Update: 01/14/2011
(Where are Jew-hired junkyard dogs like O’Reilly, Hannity, and Limbaugh?)  

Jafar Syed
Researcher – International Affairs
M.A., LL.B.
New York

In the Jewish United States, Jewish tyranny has come full circle long time ago. Nobody can dare to say a single word against the Jewish tyranny; it does not matter one is politician, a journalist or a religious leader. Count those patriotic politicians, journalists, and religious leaders who dared to speak against the Jewish tyranny and Jewish tyranny roasted them. 

Therefore, it is not a chance that nobody talks about the Jewish Jared Lee Loughner, the murderer. World only knows that he was a mentally upset Whiteman. Nobody knows that his mother is Jewish. (Under Jewish law, a person can only be Jewish if his mother is Jewish. Father’s blood does not matter) Nobody knows  that Jewish Jared Lee Loughner’s mother and wounded Jewish Congresswoman has been attending  the same synagogue.

Some patriotic voices have highlighted the Jewish origin of the murderer. Watch how Jewish tyranny will discredit these voices and make them irrelevant.  

Where are Jew-hired junkyard dogs like O’Reilly, Hannity, and Limbaugh?  If the murderer was a Muslim, reaction would have been different. They have been spewing hate not against the Muslim murderer, but also against the religion. 

Proof that murderer is a Jew:

“This is an amazing story. We now learn that Jared Lee Loughner's mother Amy Loughner is a member of the SAME Reform synagogue as Congresswoman Gabrielle Giffords! That means that Amy's son, who lives with his Jewish parents, Amy and Randy Loughner, is ALSO a member of the same synagogue as his shooting victim, Rep. Giffords.

"Why didn't we hear about this from our super-sleuth national media?
Instead, we hear that a 'WHITE MAN' is the shooter.  We hear that 'ANTI-SEMITISM' is his motive.  (Mass Mind Control anyone?)
But now...now...some FACTS are leaking out!

"His best friend, Bryce Tierney, who got a "farewell" voice message the night before the shootings tells us that his friend is Jewish. He tells us that Jared Loughner put Mein Kampf down as "favorite reading" to irritate his Jewish mother, Amy.

"The story and the coverup of the story gets wilder. The Loughners and the Giffords were members of the same Congregation Chaverim. On the Congregation Chaverim website we learn that this Reform synagogue that was founded in 1973 has 140 families. That's a very small group. The Rabbi, Stephanie Aaron surely knows every single family member of her congregation on a first name basis! That includes 22-year-old Jared Lee Loughner.

"So, it is IMPOSSIBLE that Rabbi Stephanie Aaron did not KNOW instantly upon learning that a Jared Lee Loughner had shot Congresswoman Gabrielle Giffords that BOTH people were members of her small congregation!

"But does Rabbi Aaron make ANY effort to inform the media, as she takes hundreds and hundreds of media calls from the mass media, of this fact?

"Apparently not!"  ( Media Caught Hiding Fact Loughner Is Jewish, rense.com
1-11-11) 
////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////
Brahmins honorary membership in the Whiteman club
(Indian Abroad muffles the dark reality again. Vijaya Lakshmi Pandit was the listening post of America in Soviet Union) Posted 01/11/2011

Jafar Syed
M.A., LL.B.
Researcher – International Affairs
New York

Mukul Kesavan cautions the Bharti Brahmin leadership that it should not join the violent, racist Whiteman club as an honorary white.

“What this tableau and the last decade [first decade of 21st century] ought to teach us is not schadenfreude or some glib notion that the West is dead and America vanquished. No, what we should have learnt from living out the last 10 years is a series of lesions. First, Western liberal democracies have the most violent foreign policies in the world. Second, when we speak of Western liberal democracies, the emphasis should always be on the first word. The Anglosphere and the violent alliance it has led should have taught us that what these countries primarily share aren’t democratic values but white, English speaking sense of oneness. This lesson out to shape the foreign policies of countries like ours. It should lead us to treat any talk of India being part of some global concert of democracies with extreme suspicion because what this amount to is being co-opted into  America’s wars and geo-political maneuverings in return for which America will agree to treat us as honorary whites. This is not a condition to which Indians ought to aspire. (Mukul Kesavan, A decade of imperial decline, India Abroad, January 7, 2001)

One of the worst secrets of the 20th and 21st centuries is the nature of the US-Bharat relations. The above-quoted article is another proof of muffling the dark reality. Author of the articles teaches history at the Jamia Millia Islamia, New Delhi.

The author cautions the Bharti leadership that it should not join the Angloshpere club for its violent policies and racist make-up. But he does not tell the world that Brahmin leadership was begging to become the water-carrier of the violent, racist  Whiteman club since 1947 and before.

Proof No. 1

Bharat, under Brahmin Nehru, was American satellites and listening post in USSR.
 
Vijaya Lakshmi Pandit, Bharti ambassador in the Soviet Union, was the listening post of violent and racist America in 1948.

“Can confirm information given by Chinese Ambassador New Delhi to Ambassador Grady on statements of Mrs. Pandit. She has had similar confidential conversation with me and, I believe, with heads of all missions in Moscow except Soviet satellites.

“She is obviously much concerned at Molotov’s change in attitude, but there is no real reason why she should be as both British Ambassador and myself had warned her honeymoon period for her would be last few months and thereafter she would have to take bitter with sweet, with emphasis on former

“She asked my advice as to whether, in event public opinion in India further aroused, it would be good move for India to discontinue present relations with USSR, and said public opinion in India so aroused it would probably be difficult to send another chief of mission when she left. I told her I thought it would be tactical disadvantage, as India so close to USSR it should be decided advantage to maintain adequate listening post Moscow. (845.00/3-2048: Telegram, Top Secret, The Ambassador in the Soviet Union (Smith) to the Secretary of State. Moscow, March, 20, 1948 – 1p.m., P. 499-500, Foreign Relation, 1948, Volume V)

What this secret declassified telegram proves: 1. Vijaya Lakshmi Pandit was the spy of the America. 2. She was betraying the trust of the Russians who believed that Bharti Brahmin leadership was on their side and did not know that she was the secret agent and spy of America. Believing that she was on the side of Russians, they invited her to their meetings. 3. She collected the information by attending the meeting as a Russian trusted friend, and after collecting the information, she would share the information with America and its satellites. 4. Even the important Bharti foreign matter, she consults the American representatives.

Important note. In 1948, China was still ruled by an American lackey.

Proof No. 2. Bharti Brahmin leadership decided to become the water carrier of racist and violent America before 1947. 

Brahmin Nehru did not decide to become the water carrier of racist and violent America in 1948 or in 1947; Bharti leadership decided to become the carrier of racist and violent American long before the establishment of Bharat in 1947.

“She [Vijaya Lakshmi Pandit] informed me [Smith] Nehru and most Indian leaders had long since made up their minds natural alignment with west, but that Nehru felt at present in view Indian relative impotence and fact that nation is still swaddling clothes it would be ridiculous to talk about publically of military participation in event of war. Her belief, which apparently reflects that of brother, is that India’s present role in the family of nations should be modest and relatively humble one until nation has solved own internal difficulties.” (845.00/3-2048:Telegram, Top Secret, The Ambassador in the Soviet Union (Smith) to the Secretary of State, Moscow, March, 20, 1948 – 1p.m. P. 500, Foreign Relation, 1948, Volume V)

Above-quoted proves other facts. 1. Bharti Brahmin leadership decided to become the water-carrier of America before the establishment of Bharat in 1947. 2. For the Bharti leadership, alliance with America was natural 3. Bharti Brahmin leadership wanted to keep it secret for few reasons. One reason was that it was relative impotence. Second reason was that it was in swaddling clothes. The third reason was that it was facing internal difficulties.

Do you think that Mukul Kesavan who teaches history at the Jamia Millia Islamia, New Delhi does not know that Nehru was the secret agent of America? Do you think that owner of India Abroad does not know that Bharat has been the secret agent of America?

Why do the Bharti leadership and intellectual not tell the world about the closet relations between Nehru and Truman? 

The fact of the matter is that Bharti Brahmin leadership has been fooling the world as the champion of the occupied and the exploited world, and enemy of the imperialist camp led by America. This fooling of the world brought political gains for Bharat. Bharat became the most trusted friend of the occupied and exploited Asia, Africa, and Latin America. Even today, Bharat is considered as anti-imperialist.

These closet relations did not end with Truman and Nehru. They still exist.

To lift the veil is very hard for Bharti leadership and Bharti intellectual. It is the moral obligations of oppressed Dalits, Sikhs, and Muslims to lift the veil and show the real face of Bharti Brahmin leadership. Why? Because they are the main victim of Bharti Brahmin Raj.   
//////////////////////////////////////////////////////////// Part 11. Friend like Obama and Pakistani traitor leadership!
(US occupation of Muslim Central Asia benefits Brahmin Raj)  Posted on 12/28/2010  
Jafar Syed M.A. LL.B. Researcher – International AffairsNew York  Whose war Jewish Berry Obama and Pakistani leadership is fighting in Afghanistan? They are fighting for Brahmin Raj in Afghanistan. Always ask for the proof and proof is here. “The likes of C Raja Mohan, one of India’s leading foreign policy analysts, and others have expressed concerns over the possibility of an Obama administration being activist in India-Pakistan relations, particularly over Kashmir Aziz Haniffa of India Abroad asks the question.  Stephen Cohen South Asia expert answers.  “I like him, I respect him, and he is one of the sharpest [Indian strategic thinkers], but his options for India are totally incompatible with each other, that epitomizes to me the ambivalence of India towards strategy generally and towards Pakistan in Particular. The United States can’t wait; we are in a war Afghanistan, and we are fighting that war in part for Indian interests. If the Indians have a better way of fighting it than we do, please let’s hear from them. I really think there are opportunities for a really dialogue.” (Stephen Cohen, The South Asia expert discusses Obama’s sub-continent policy with India Abroad Aziz Haniffa, November 21, 2008, India Abroad) Interviewer is Aziz Haniffa. Interviewee is Stephen Cohen.  Does world needs an expert that murdering of Muslim in Afghanistan help anti-Muslim and occupier of Kashmir, Brahmin Raj.   Who will benefit from the occupation of Muslim Central Asia by USA? Anti-Muslim and occupier of Kashmir, Brahmin Raj, will benefit again. Where is the proof?  Proof is again here. Note how many benefits Brahmin Raj bags from US occupation of Muslim Central Asia. These benefits are stated by Ambassador M K Bhadrakumar. He was a career diplomat in the Indian Foreign Service. His assignments included the Soviet Union, South Korea, Sri Lanka, Germany, Afghanistan, Pakistan, Uzbekistan, Kuwait, and Turkey.  His article is published in Asia times. Title of the article is NATO weaves South Asian web, Asia Times, December 28, 2010.

 “Several considerations will influence the Indian approach in the coming period. One, India is an [sic] direct beneficiary of the US's "Greater Central Asia" strategy, which aims at drawing that region closer to South Asia by creating new linkages, especially economic.

“Second, India has no strong views regarding NATO's partnership programs in Central Asia – unlike Russia or China, which harbor disquiet over it. At a minimum, there is no conflict of interest between India and NATO on this score. On the outer side, India would see advantages if NATO indeed works on a strategy to "encircle" China in Central Asia. The US military base in Manas, Kyrgyzstan, the induction of a
fleet of AWACS (airborne warning and control system) aircraft into Afghanistan, and so forth give the alliance certain capability already to monitor the Xinjiang and Tibet regions where China has located its missiles targeted at India.

“It is within the realms of possibility that NATO would at a future date deploy components of the US missile defense system in Afghanistan. Ostensibly directed against the nearby "rogue states", the missile defense system will challenge the Chinese strategic capability. Meanwhile, India is also developing its missile defense capabilities and future cooperation with the US in the sphere is on the cards.

“Contacts with NATO at the level of the Indian military establishment have been unobtrusive but have also become a regular affair. NATO delegations have been regularly interacting with Indian think tanks and the defense and foreign policy establishment in Delhi. Unsurprisingly, much of this interaction remains sequestered from public view even as the Indian establishment continues to mouth for public consumption its traditional aversion toward military alliances and blocs.

“Top Indian officials have crafted a new idiom calling for an "inclusive" security architecture for South Asia, a firm wedge leaving the door open for the inclusion of the extra-regional entities such as the US and/or NATO at some point. India probably perceives such "inclusiveness" as useful and necessary to balance China's rapidly growing profile in the South Asian region.

“Most certainly, India harbors the hope that a NATO presence in Afghanistan for the foreseeable future may not be a bad thing to happen, after all. Delhi regards NATO's continued participation in the Afghanistan-Pakistan conflicts to be a bulwark against the possibility of a Taliban takeover in Afghanistan.

“Also, it is useful for India that the Western alliance continues to be seized of the paradigm (from the Indian perspective) that the core issue of regional security in South Asia is the Pakistani military's policy of using the Taliban militants to gain "strategic depth" and of conceiving terrorism as an instrument of state policy.

“Again, given India's rivalry with China, Delhi watches with unease the US efforts to engage China in a geopolitical dialogue over Pakistan's long-term security, although logically, it ought to feel a stake in avoiding a regional upheaval in Pakistan and ought to welcome a constructive role by China in helping to stabilize the situation in Pakistan.

“ With India, on the other hand, the US has been promoting interoperability, discussing the potentials of cooperation in meeting mutually threatening contingencies and developing genuine strategic cooperation. The massive induction of US-made weapons systems into the Indian armed forces that can be expected in the coming period will accelerate these processes, and it is entirely conceivable that at some point India may overcome its lingering suspicions regarding Western domination and establish formal links with NATO with a modest first step of forming a joint council.”  Few comments.  1.         An informed person like the author of the article knows that Bharat was the secret agent of America since 1947. He knows that Vijaya Lakshmi Pandit was the “listening post” of America in Soviet Union. (Friend like Obama and Pakistani traitor leadership, Part 1, muslimdailyny.org, posted on 12/24/2010)2.         Will Karzai Afghanistan be the base for maintaining US occupation of Central Asia?3.         Will Christian America and Christian Russia divide the Muslim Central?4.         Will there be an end of murders of Muslims which Pope Urban 11 preached in 1095 and triggered the First Crusade?5.         How many proofs Pakistanis need that America is not a friend of Pakistan?

/////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////
Friend like Obama and Pakistani traitor leadership!
(Zardari and Sharif do not believe in the existence of Pakistan) Posted on 12/24/ 2010

Jafar Syed
M.A., LL.B.
Researcher International Affairs
New York

The traitor leadership of Pakistan is writing another shameful chapter in the history of Pakistan. It has sacrificed 30,000 Pakistanis since September 11. It deploys 140,000 troops to murder patriotic forces who are fighting against the American occupation of Afghanistan and Bharti occupation of Kashmir.

Pakistani leadership is making all these sacrifices for whom? For Americans who were against the creation of Pakistan. For Americans who co-opted the Pakistani leadership when Pakistan emerged as an independent county against the designs of Americans. For Americans who were not “a factor” in the dismemberment of Pakistan but “the factor” in its dismemberment.  For Americans who are writing the final chapter of eliminating Pakistan from the surface of Pakistan.

Anti-Pakistan policies have turned an ugly turn under Jewish Berry Obama since 1947. He decouples Kashmir tragedy. He bestows first state visit to Bharat. He champions permanent seat for Bharat in Security Council.  He expunges ISRO (Indian Space Research Organization) and DRDO (Defense Research and Development Organization) from the Entity List. He clears the way for Bharat to become member of Nuclear Supplier Group, the Missile Technology Control Regime, the Wassenar Group, and the Australia Group.

Obama gives blank check to Bharat and this act has regional and international implications. Note the un-opposed Bharti membership to Security Council for two years.  Note defiant Bharat cancelled bilateral defense exchange with China. Note Bharat attends Noble Peace ceremony for Chinese dissident Liu Xiaobo to embarrass China.  

Why Bharat punishes China? It punishes China for its pro-Pakistani stances. China does not endorse Bharti polices in Kashmir. China nuclear cooperation with Pakistan irritates Bharat.   

What is the ultimate goal of Bharat? Isolate Pakistan and destroy it. Why? Pakistan mere existence frustrates Bharti hegemonic designs in South Asia and beyond.

Why Pakistani leadership is destroying the anti-occupation forces that are waging war against the occupation of America and Bharat?

By joining the “terror war,” Musharraf became the darling of America. Zardari and Sharif do not believe in the existence of Pakistan. Zardari believes in a borderless world. For Sharif, Partition is a “Berlin Wall. Second, Pakistani leadership knows that Washington doors open in Tel Aviv and New Delhi. No leader in Pakistan can come to power without signing on the dotted lines drawn by the American leadership. Every Pakistani leader knows the hanging of Bhutto.  

As US-Bharat relations are concerned, Bharat has been the secret agent of America. Proof? Indian Ambassador in the Soviet Union Vijaya Lakshmi Pandit was the “listening post” of America.

“Since 1947, Bharat has been the secret agent of the United States. Since 1947, its leadership, its journalists, its intellectuals, and its writers have been fooling the world that Bharat stands for the occupied world.

The fact is that Bharti membership in the Non-alignment was to subvert the movement, to mask its real identity and to get credibility by the occupied nations.

“Proof? Declassified documents of the United States. These documents prove without any doubt that Bharti leadership was the secret agent of America.  “This role did not start today. The first secret agent of the United States was Prime Minister Nehru. His sister, Vijaya Lakshami Pandit, ambassador in the Soviet Union was the listening post of the America in Moscow.

“This is not the only documents which unmask Nehru as the spy of the US. There are hundreds of documents, which prove that Bharti leadership was not for the occupied world. Continued occupation of Kashmir by the Bharti leadership is another proof that Bharti leadership was and is the agent of America. Bharat could not occupy Kashmir and could not continue the occupation without the sponsorship of America.

 In the past, Bharat was the secret agent. But now it openly sides with the United. The reason is that Bharat is no more “impotent” [Pandit Lakshami own words] and is no more in “swaddling clothes” [Pandit Lakshami own words]

“Read this secret document and decide yourself. The author of the document is American Ambassador Smith in the Soviet Union. He wrote this letter for the US Secretary of State in March 20, 1948. It is labeled Top Secret.

“512. Can confirm information given by Chinese Ambassador New Delhi to Ambassador Grady on statements of Mrs. Pandit. She has had similar confidential conversation with me and, I believe, with heads of practically all missions in Moscow except Soviet satellites.

“She is obviously much concerned at Molotov’s change in attitude, but there is no real reason why she should be as both British Ambassador and myself had warned her honeymoon period for her would last few months and thereafter she would have to take bitter with sweet, with emphasis on former.

“She asked my advice as to whether, in event public opinion in India further aroused, it would be good move for India to discontinue present relations with USSR, and said public opinion in India so aroused it would probably be difficult to send another chief of mission when she left. I told her I thought it would be tactical disadvantage, as India so close to USSR it should be decided advantage to maintain adequate listening post Moscow.

“She emphasized her brother had been deeply affronted by action and attitude Soviet Ambassador New Delhi. She herself now restricts her attendance at Soviet official functions to about fifteen minutes.

“She informed me Nehru and most Indian leaders had long since made up their minds natural alignment was with west, but that Nehru felt at present in view Indian relative impotence and fact that nation is still in swaddling clothes it would be ridiculous to talk publicity of military participation in event of war. Her belief, which apparently reflects that of brother, is that India’s present role in family of nations should be modest and relatively humble one until nation has solved own internal difficulties.

“Repeated to London as 36. Department repeat to New Delhi. Smith.” (Bharat Selection to UN Security Council, Muslimdailyny.org)

Muslim World must realize that staged September 11, justified the 21st Century Crusade against the Muslim World. It is the continuation of the first Crusade of eleventh century (1096) and the subsequent crusades. Then the Crusades of 20th century came. First World War and Second War. Note the Muslim World loses in these two wars.

View the Muslim destruction by the Christians in more than one thousand years. They destroy every sovereign center of the Muslim World. Who destroy the Muslim Spain? Christians. Who destroy the Muslim Bharat? Christians. Who destroy the Muslim Center in Turkey? Christians.

View the Muslim World of twenty first century. Note the bleeding Somalia, bleeding Sudan, bleeding Afghanistan, bleeding Pakistan, and bleeding Iraq. In all these cases, one can see the visible hand of Christian America. 

Is it a chance that Hindu, Christians and Jews have joined hands to destroy the Muslim World. Is it chance that all physically occupying powers of Chechnya, Iraq, Afghanistan, Palestine and Kashmir are Christians, Jews and Hindus.

Is there any solution to save the Muslim World from the slaughter of Christians, Jews, and Hindus? Of course there is. First, identify the enemy and educate the Muslims all over the world about this enemy. Second, do not allow any Muslim leadership to become the agent of the Christians, Jews, and Hindus. Third, never think as Pakistani, Afghan, or Saudis. Always think as a member of the Muslim World wherever you are. 
///////////////////////////////////////////////////////////
Senator Levin and Christians’ worldwide occupation
(America is a permanent warfare state … muslimdailyny.org)
Posted 11/23/201

Highlights
- Jewish hired pimp Bill O’ Reilly says that Muslims attacked us. Then “Christians murdered millions of Vietnamese, Iraqis and Afghans.” Muslimdailyny.org)
-  Jewish hired pimp Bill O Reilly, how many millions non-Christians are murdered by the Christians?   
- US Strategic Command played a vital role in maintaining the Christians’ worldwide occupation
- Much of the technical superiority of U.S. military forces is reliant on space systems … Senator Levin
- One of the newest and most challenging areas of responsibility for the Strategic Command is the area of cyber operations—protecting and defending Defense Department networks and cyber assets and if directed, engaging in offensive cyber operations … Senator Levin
- The real face of America is that it is a worst worldwide tyranny and a worst “permanent warfare state” in the history of mankind
- The missile threat from rogue nations like Iran and North Korea is increasing, but equally worrisome is China’s growing air and conventional missile capabilities.  According to the U.S.-China Economic and Security Review Commission 2010 Report to Congress concludes:  China has the ability to strike five out of six U.S. Air Force Bases in East Asia (Opening statement by Senator John McCain at nomination hearing of the Senate Armed Services Committee - US Strategic Command and US Africa Command)
- In the past, I have been critical of U.S. military involvement on the Horn of Africa … Opening Statement of by Senator John McCain at nomination hearing)
- But the threat from the region to our friends, our interests and even our homeland has changed significantly in the past few years … (Opening Statement by Senator John McCain at nomination hearing)
- AFRICOM remains unique among equals. And it’s why AFRICOM must be prepared and resourced to protect Americans, American interests and America security throughout its area of responsibility Opening statement by Senator McCain )
- In 1998, Al Qaeda launched attacks on the U.S. embassies in Kenya and Tanzania, killing 12 Americans.  Al Qaeda and related groups have executed subsequent terrorist attacks in East Africa, including an American suicide bomber in Somalia in October 2008. And this summer in Uganda, Al Shabaab, a Somali Islamist insurgent group with ties to Al Qaeda, conducted its first successful attack outside Somali territory, killing 76 people, including one American (Opening statement of  Senator McCain)



Jafar Syed
M.A. LL.B.
Researcher – International Affairs
New York


It is November 18, 2010. Two nominated generals appear before the US Senate Arms Committee. One is General Claude R. Kehler, USAF, and other is General Carter F. Ham, USA. Senate Armed Service Committee is headed by Democratic Senator Carl Levin. If nominated, General Kehler will command the United States Strategic Command, and General Ham will be the commander of United States Africa Command. One command is global and regional in nature, and other is mostly regional in nature.   

Before unmasking the real objectives of the Senator Levin hearing statement and what these two Commands have been doing and will do in the 21 century, it is very important to know the real face of the United States of America.



The real face of America is that it is a worst worldwide tyranny and a worst “permanent warfare state” in the history of mankind. Four intentionally crafted doctrines make it a “permanent warfare state.” Implementation of these crafted doctrines keeps America always at war or preparing for war. (For details, article Christians murders millions of Vietnamese, Iraqis and Afghans, muslimsdailyny.org) 

A. What United States Strategic Command does?

Strategic Command has been crafted to achieve the following objectives.


“Ensuring the United States has access to and freedom of action in space and cyberspace; maintaining a reliable nuclear deterrent, and being prepared to respond if deterrence fails; providing targeting and other support to U.S. Joint Force Commanders; synchronizing global missile defense plans and operations; coordinating regional efforts to combat weapons of mass destruction; planning, integrating, and coordinating intelligence surveillance and reconnaissance (ISR) assets in support of strategic and global operations; and guiding the implementation of the New START Treaty when it is ratified. (Senator Levin, Hearing statement on the nomination of General Claude R. Kohler, USAF) and General Carter F. Ham, USA)

B. What United States African Command does?
“General Ham you have had a distinguished career in the Army and we thank you for your willingness to serve our country over the last three-and-a-half decades. If confirmed, you will be only the second commander of U.S. Africa Command (AFRICOM) and you will be forced to balance the requirements of continuing to standup this nascent geographic combatant command, as well as play a supporting role in advancing U.S. policy objectives on the continent of Africa.

“General Ham, the challenges facing AFRICOM are staggering – terrorism and violent extremists in Somalia and West Africa, conflicts between state and non-state actors that rage across borders, fragile governments that lack the capacity to project their presence beyond the bounds of their capitals, illicit arms smuggling routes, and nations where peacekeeping or peace enforcing forces are the best and sometimes the only hope for security and stability. The committee looks forward to hearing your views on these matters.
 (Senator McCain, Hearing statement on the nomination of General Claude R. Kohler, USAF) and General Carter F. Ham, USA)


Before analyzing the statement of Senator McCain, read this excerpts which is quoted in muslimdailyny.org. Christians murder millions of Vietnamese, Iraqis and Afghans.


“Conceived by Forrestal at the beginning of the Cold War, and reflecting his own anticommunist obsessions, semiwar defines a condition in which great dangers always threaten the United States, and will continue doing so into the indefinite future. When not actively engaged in hostilities, the nation faces the prospect of hostilities beginning at any moment, with little or no warning. In the setting of national priorities, readiness to act becomes a supreme value.”


Now read the Senator McCain statement.


“The missile threat from rogue nations like Iran and North Korea is increasing, but equally worrisome is China’s growing air and conventional missile capabilities.  According to the U.S.-China Economic and Security Review Commission 2010 Report to Congress concludes:  China has the ability to strike five out of six U.S. Air Force Bases in East Asia.”
(McCain opening statement)


It fits the imaginary threat scenario. “great dangers always threaten the United States, and will continue doing so into the indefinite future.”


Why are North Korea, Iran and China a threat to the United States? There should be some reasons. And what are those reasons?


North Korea is a survival of US destruction which was inflicted on the Korean nations in “Korean War.” Only in America vocabulary destruction of a nation thousands of miles away by Americans becomes a “war.”

North Korea was not occupied to keep South Korea under the occupation. If there was no North Korea, there would be no US military presence in South Korea. There would be no South Korean dependence on Americans to “save” them from North Koreans. And final chapter of this “tragedy” is not yet written.


Why is Iran a threat to America? Is it not the same Iran which was once the pillar of “stability” in the region? Is it not the same Iran which was pouring billions of dollars in the US economy? Is it not the same Iran which was the “most favored” nation of Israel and America?

Something changed in 1979. And Iranians are still paying the price for that change. Now it is a “rogue nation” – “epic center of terrorism.”

And China? When it became a threat to the United States? Was it not the same China which was the ally of America in Second World War? Was it not the same China which paid a very heavy price for siding with America?


But something change when the “Communists” took over China. And with this change, its containment began. First it was a destructive involvement. Now it is “constructive involvement.” Note its encirclement by the United State. Who is encircling China? Japan, Taiwan, Vietnamese, South Korea, Bharat. What a ring? Add another name in the list. Australia. Secretary of State Hillary Clinton recent trip. Add another name if you wish.     


Note how Senator McCain views the Horn of Africa.


“In the past, I have been critical of U.S. military involvement on the Horn of Africa. But the threat from the region to our friends, our interests and even our homeland has changed significantly in the past few years.

“AFRICOM remains unique among equals. And it’s why AFRICOM must be prepared and resourced to protect Americans, American interests and America security throughout its area of responsibility

“In 1998, Al Qaeda launched attacks on the U.S. embassies in Kenya and Tanzania, killing 12 Americans.  Al Qaeda and related groups have executed subsequent terrorist attacks in East Africa, including an American suicide bomber in Somalia in October 2008. And this summer in Uganda, Al Shabaab, a Somali Islamist insurgent group with ties to Al Qaeda, conducted its first successful attack outside Somali territory, killing 76 people, including one American (Opening statement by Senator John McCain)


Is it not the same Somalia whose leadership was in the pocket of Christians? Is it not the same “Mujahdeens” who were once sacrificing their lives to dismember the Soviet Union? Something change and now Somalis and “Mujahdeens” are paying the price.

Cyclical destruction


Western Christianity led by Christian “Tiny Britain,” Christian France and Christian America cannot survive without violence.


Jewish hired pimp Bill O’ Reilly says that Muslims attacked us. Then “Christians murdered millions of Vietnamese, Iraqis and Afghans.” Muslimdailyny.org)

Jewish hired pimp Bill O Reilly how many millions non-Christians are murdered by the Christians?   
/////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////
Christians murder millions of Vietnames, Iraqis and Afghans  
(Murdering of 500,000 Iraqi children “is a hard choice, but I think, we think, it's worth it” … Jewish Secretary of State Madeleine Albright) updated 11/18/2010


Highlights
 - Anti-Muslim Bill O’ Reilly claims that Muslims attack us on September 11. Under this logic,    Hindu, Jews and Christians are murdering Muslims
- Christians murder 14 million in First World War 1 and 70 million in Second Word War 11
- Four misguided doctrines justify the genocidal policies and world-wide occupation by Christians
- Any nation who does not submit to the Christians’ divine right to murder and to occupation is either evil empire or a rouge state
-America is a “permanent war state” for its misguided principals and barbaric tools
- Americans create an illusion of being attacked when they are not murdering and occupying other nations
- Genocide of Vietnamese, Iraqis and Afghanis since World War 11 proves the barbaric policies and acts of the Americans
- American foreign policy goal is to advance corporate capitalism in the United States and abroad
- Dual containment – destruction of both parties. This Christians are doing in Iraq, Somalia, Sudan and Afghanistan. 'If we see that Germany is winning we should help Russia and if Russia is winning then we ought to help Germany and that way let them kill as many as possible … President Truman (
http://www.highbeam.com/doc/1G1-141293906.html)

Jafar Syed
M.A. LL.B.
Researcher – International Affairs
New York

Americans are a murderous nation and are worldwide occupiers. To justify their murderous policies and worldwide occupation, they act under misguided doctrines. They apply most brutal tools to fulfill their misguided doctrines. In pursuing these misguided principles with most brutal tools, they do not care for the devastating consequences at home and abroad. America is permanent war state for its misguided doctrines and brutal acts. There is no end in sight to end this permanent war because any setback is justified by tabling worthless explanations. Glaring examples are the genocide of the Vietnamese, Iraqis and Afghans. American economic elite is the only one who benefits from misguided doctrines and application of brutal tools through political elite.

These are some of the conclusions which can be inferred from the review which is published in Asia Times.

Jim Ash, Canadian writer and editor, reviews Washington Rules: America’s Path to Permanent War by Andrew J Bacevich. Author of the book is a retired colonel of US army. 
 

According to the reviewer, there are four basic premises that have converted America into permanent warfare state.   
 “For Bacevich, there are four essential premises that have led the US to become a permanent warfare state. One: the world must be shaped. Two: only the United States is capable of doing this. Three: only the US has the right to do so because it is intrinsically good. Four: the rest of the world accepts these principles - and countries that don't are ''evil empires'' or ''rogue states''.

“These four principles comprise what Bacevich calls the national security consensus, or credo. They are the "Washington rules."

These four principles are implemented by a consistent and determined policy.

“From the principles flows the practice. The consensus has resulted in the enshrining of what Bacevich calls the sacred trinity of US military practice: a global military presence; the ability to project power anywhere in the world; and a penchant for intervention abroad by force.”

And the result is warfare state.

“This trinity keeps America in a constant state of crisis, in what James Forrestal, the first US defense secretary, called a state of ''semiwar''. Bacevich writes:

“Conceived by Forrestal at the beginning of the Cold War, and reflecting his own anticommunist obsessions, semiwar defines a condition in which great dangers always threaten the United States, and will continue doing so into the indefinite future. When not actively engaged in hostilities, the nation faces the prospect of hostilities beginning at any moment, with little or no warning. In the setting of national priorities, readiness to act becomes a supreme value.

“In Bacevich's view, semiwar has been a debacle, both for the US and for the world at large. For Americans, it has resulted in obscene - and unaffordable - levels of defense spending, a military that has far too much power over US policy and a succession of real wars that cost many lives and much treasure, but have done little to really advance American interests in the world.

“This is to say nothing of the suffering US foreign policy has inflicted on non-Americans.

“At one point in Washington Rules, he discusses a famous moment in 1996 when Madeleine Albright - then permanent representative to the United Nations - was asked about a report that 500,000 Iraqi children had died as a result of US sanctions against the country. ''It's a hard choice,'' she replied. ''But I think, we think, it's worth it.'' For Bacevich, this comment is very revealing:”

Americans are blinded by the divine right to murder and to occupy the world.

“American purposes are by definition enlightened... The pursuit of exalted ends empowers the United States to employ whatever means it deems necessary. If US-enforced sanctions had indeed caused the deaths of 500,000 Iraqi children, at least those children had died in a worthy cause. This was not cynicism or hypocrisy on Albright's part. It was conviction encased in an implacable sense of righteousness.

“Policy above reproach it is not just civilian casualties that US policymakers are unconcerned with. For Bacevich, there is no outcome - no matter how disastrous - that will make the American establishment question either the premises of the Washington consensus, or the sacred military trinity that they underpin.

“He [Bacevich] shows this clearly in his analysis of three American wars: Vietnam and the invasion and occupation of Iraq and Afghanistan. The Vietnam War ended up devastating three countries, turned the US into a debtor nation and crippled the American army as a fighting force for years afterward. The invasion of Iraq quickly became a bloody quagmire that cost endless dollars and lives but served only to increase the influence in that country of Iran - the US archenemy du jour. And after a quick, painless (for the West, at least) victory over the Taliban in Afghanistan, the US and a shrinking list of its allies are now bogged down in a brutal counter-insurgency, employing tactics that Bacevich argues were discredited during the Vietnam War.

And Americans do not want to learn any lessons from their genocidal policies in these countries. 

“Have US elites learned anything from all this? Not a chance, Bacevich says. Soon after the last Americans left Vietnam, the process of whitewashing what happened there began. The gospel now is that the US failed in Vietnam because it couldn't get the formula quite right. It made specific errors in how it employed its power there, errors that saw a worthy undertaking derailed. But the consensus of American exceptionalism, of American power as a moral force with a duty to reshape the world, survived intact.”

Reviewer of the book wants an answer from the author that why do Americans live in a permanent war- state?

“Propelled by Bacevich's terse, active prose, Washington Rules is an easy read. And for such a short book, it's a surprisingly deep examination of US military history since World War II. But it doesn't satisfactorily answer the larger question of why America can't put an end to its permanent national emergency, its perpetual semiwar. Why do US elites, both military and civilian, keep believing in the credo and the trinity, no matter what the cost? Are they deluded or disingenuous? Or put another way, do they really believe their own bullshit?

“Bacevich seems torn on this question. We have seen him describe Albright as neither a cynic nor a hypocrite. And he gives the impression that other key US figures - like Eisenhower-era CIA chief Allen Dulles and air-force nuclear warrior Curtis LeMay - were true believers, whatever their other faults. But he also, in a single paragraph in the book's conclusion, tells us who benefits from the Washington rules. His answer: Washington does. Believing the credo and accepting the trinity delivers ''profit, power and privilege to a long list of beneficiaries'' inside the US establishment, Bacevich writes. But if this is so, are we supposed to accept that all of Washington's spear-carriers really believe the gospel that they preach?

“If there is ambiguity in Bacevich's position (and to be fair, his other books may resolve it), perhaps it is because the author is wary of moving too far into the territory of the most famous academic critics of US power, such as Chomsky and Michael Parenti. For them, there is nothing bungled about American  foreign policy. Its goal is to advance corporate capitalism, in the United States and abroad.

“Under this reading, as long as the rich elites of the world make out - which they are doing more than ever today - it doesn't matter how many of the little people get stepped on, or how much chaos ensues in the US or anywhere else. In parts of Washington Rules, Bacevich leans toward this position, but he refuses to come down from the fence.”
////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////
Dalits after six decades under Brahmin Raj
(Two hundred and fifty million native Bhartis are deprived of their basic human rights under Brahmin Raj)

Posted on 10/26/2010
Highlights

- Anti-Muslim Bill O’ Reilly claims that Muslims killed us on September 11. Under this logic, Hindu, Jews and Christians are killing Muslims
- So many factors bind Hindu, Jews and Christians terrorists together. State terror is the worst terror
- Christians, Hindus and Jews are running the largest prison camps in the world
- “I mean, look, Bill, I’m not a bigot. You know the kind of books I’ve written about the civil rights movement in this country,” he said. “But when I get on a plane, I got to tell you, if I see people who are in Muslim garb and I think, you know, they’re identifying themselves first and foremost as Muslims, I get worried. I get nervous.”  … Anti Muslim Juan Williams at anti-Muslim Bill O, Reilly juggler show
- If Muslim grab terrifies Juan Williams then Brahmin dohti, Jewish yamaka and Christians necktie should terrified Muslims all over the world
- If Muslim grab is symbol of Islam first and America second for anti-Muslim Juan Williams then Brahmin dohti, Jewish Yamaka and Christians necktie must be treated by Juan Williams as he treats Muslims grab
- United front of native Bhartis (Dalits), Sikhs and Muslims living in Bharat is the only answer to Brahmin minorities
- Reservation for the Native Bhartis was a fraud. It helped on the upper caste Hindus. “The state's failure in this respect along with a flawed reservation system restricted to the entry point only helped ‘ caste-Hindu' bureaucrats to fill most of the higher posts on the ground that “qualified, eligible and fit” persons were not available among the Dalit claimants. (S. Visanathan, The plight of Dalit and the news media, The Hindu, 10/25/2010)
- This is the true face of Brahmin Bharat, hired gun of the Brahmin Raj Hardeep Singh Puri, Bharti permanent representative to United Nation. He is labeled as “The architect of India’s stunning victory at the United Nation.  “It is not surprising that in a country in which a substantial section of the people, accounting for one-fifth of the population and segregated for centuries, remain poor, ill-treated, humiliated, and discriminated against, state intervention is the only antidote even after six decades of democratic governance under a republican Constitution. A major concern for the state is how to address the alarmingly rising unemployment among this section of society. (S. Visanathan, The plight of Dalit and the news media, The Hindu, 10/25/2010)
- In which world S. Visanathan you live? “In addition to exposing atrocities against Dalits, the press, television, and radio should investigate systemic oppression, exploitation, and discrimination in greater depth” (S. Visanathan, The plight of Dalit and the news media, The Hindu, 10/25/2010)
- Who are the Dalits?The "untouchables."The Dalits, also called the “untouchables,” “outcastes,” and most recently “slumdogs,” comprise nearly one quarter of India’s society, with population estimates of 250 million people. The term “Dalit” means “those who have been broken and ground down deliberately by those above them in the social hierarchy.” Dalits live at risk of discrimination, dehumanization, violence, and enslavement through human trafficking every day. By all global research and reports, the Dalits constitute the largest number of people categorized as victims of modern-day slavery.http://www.dalitnetwork.org/go?/dfn/who_are_the_dalit/C157/


Jafar Syed
M.A., LL.B.
Researcher – International Affairs



There are three races on this earth who are running the largest prison camps even in the twentieth century. They are Jews, Hindus and Christians. Besides running the largest concentration camps, what else is common between them? They are self-claimed democracies. What else? They claim that they are chosen people by god and they claim that they are also light into the nations. What else binds them together? Think over. All are occupier races. Jews have been occupying Palestine; Hindus have been occupying Bharat and American Christians have been occupying America. All of them committed genocide against the native inhabitants of the occupied countries and locked the surviving native inhabitants in specific locations. Christians have established “reservations” for the surviving native Americans. Jews have named their prisons as Ghaza and West Bank.  Hindus have confined seventy percent of two hundred and twenty native Bhartis, untouchable, in rural areas.



After more than sixty year of deprivation and exploitation of the two hundred fifty million native Bhartis, a new Jailer is appointed by the Brahmins. His name is P.J. Punia. He will head the National Commission for Scheduled Castes (NSCS). And this new chairman is fooling the native Bhartis and the world and is also adding insult to injury by making new promises which include reservations for native Bhartis (Dalits) in private sectors and strict implementation of Scheduled Castes Sub-Plan.

No body is asking him what happened to Scheduled Castes Sub- Plan which was introduced in 1980s. Under this program each ministry was to allocate special funds from its annual budget for the benefits for native Bhartis. If it was not implemented in the past six dates, what factors warrant that it will be implemented in the coming decades?


Fact is that Bharat is ruled by the Brahmins. To be respectable in the world, they are hiding behind the signboard of democracy. Ruling Brahmins play another trick to fool the world and their oppressed and occupied minorities. They have recruited in house “N” from the oppressed and occupied minorities. Prime Minister Manmohan Singh and Hardeep Singh Puri, Bharti permanent representative to United Nations know this fact. By accepting the role of water carriers of Brahmin Raj, they have traded the blood of their own one hundred thousand Sikh brothers who were butchered by the custodians of Brahmin Raj.



The only way to end the Brahmin’s tyranny is the united front of two hundred fifty million native Bharti, two hundred million Muslims, twenty three millions Sikhs and other oppressed minorities.
Anti-Muslim Bill O’ Reilly claims that Muslims attack us.
Read the exchange between the guest and the hosts.

Written by Raven Clabough    http://www.thenewamerican.com/index.php/culture/37-history/4935-the-view-co-hosts-walk-out-on-bill-oreilly
Tuesday, 19 October 2010 14:40 


 Fury over the Ground Zero mosque in New York prompted ladies of The View to walk off stage on Thursday, October 14, after their guest, Fox News’ Bill O’Reilly, made remarks about the mosque that sparked a heated argument.
O’Reilly appeared on Thursday’s episode of The View to promote the release of his newest book, Pinheads and Patriots: Where You Stand in the Age of Obama. During his appearance, O’Reilly discussed some of the issues addressed in his book related to Obama’s approval ratings, including what O’Reilly perceives to be a cultural disconnect between the President and the American people.
According to O’Reilly, one of the areas in which Obama is disconnected from the American people is in regard to the Ground Zero mosque. As he attempted to explain his stance, however, the conversation quickly became heated:
O'REILLY: The mosque — the mosque down here on 9/11, that's inappropriate. It's — sure, they have a right to do it and in the Constitution, but it's inappropriate because a lot of the 9/11 families, who I know, say, "Look, we don't want that. It shouldn't be there."
BARBARA WALTERS, CO-HOST, THE VIEW: What about the discussion?
O'REILLY: No, no, no. No, no, no. But there is the president -- there is the president going, "Well, they have a right to do it." And, then the guy said…
JOY BEHAR, CO-HOST, THE VIEW: Yes! This is America. This is America.
O'REILLY: Hold it! Hold it! Listen to me because you'll learn.
BEHAR: Pinhead. Pinhead.
O'REILLY: Thank you! So he says to the press, "Yes, they have a right to do it" and that's true.
WHOOPI GOLDBERG, CO-HOST, THE VIEW: Yes?
O'REILLY: And then the question is, "But what about the wisdom of it, Mr. President? And, he goes "I'm not going to comment," whereupon everybody in the country goes, "What?"
BEHAR: We're Americans. We agree with him.
O'REILLY: You agree with him. Most Americans…
BEHAR: No, we're Americans. I'm an American.
O'REILLY: Let me break this to you: 70 percent of Americans don't want that mosque down there.
BEHAR: Where is that poll?
O'REILLY: So don't give me the "we" business.
BEHAR: Where is that poll? I want to see that poll.
O'REILLY: Do you want to bet on that? Do you want to bet? I will show you that poll in a minute.
BEHAR: All I'm saying is I'm American, too.
GOLDBERG: Seventy percent of Americans don't want…
O'REILLY: Yes! Seventy percent.
GOLDBERG: …don't want it there.
BEHAR: Why is that?
GOLDBERG: But why are we saying…
O'REILLY: Because it is inappropriate.
GOLDBERG: Why is it inappropriate if 70 percent…
(CROSSTALK)
O'REILLY: Muslims killed us on 9/11.
GOLDBERG: No! Oh my God! That is (EXPLETIVE DELETED.)
O'REILLY: Muslims didn't kill us on 9/11, is that what you're saying?
GOLDBERG: Extremists. Excuse me, extremists…
(CROSSTALK)
BEHAR: What religion was Mr. McVeigh?
O'REILLY: I'm telling you, 70 percent of the…
BEHAR: I don't want to sit here now. I don't sit here.
O'REILLY: Go. Go.
BEHAR: I'm outraged by that statement.
O'REILLY: You are outraged about Muslims killed us on 9/11?
(GOLDBERG AND BEHAR WALK OFF SET)
Immediately      

///////////////////////////////////////////////////////////
Bharat selection to UN Security Council!
(An occupier secret agent is rewarded for its services)
 
Highlights

- American Ambassador in Moscow confirmed that Ambassador Lakshmi Pandit in Moscow was the spy of America. She betrayed the confidence of the Russians who used to invite her to the official meeting. She used to collect the information by attending the official Russian meetings and then used to inform the American authorities and the representatives of the clients states of America in Moscow … Secret document
- Ambassador Lakshmi Pandit was worried that Russian Foreign Minister Molotov has changed its attitude … American Ambassador Smith in Moscow
- American and British ambassadors warned Mrs. Pandit that the “honeymoon” between her and the Russian officials would be over within months … Secret documents
- Ambassador Lakshmi Pandit sought the advice of the American Ambassador Smith to end the relations with Soviet Union or not … Secret document
- What tricks juggler Nehru played that helped him to gain the trust of the Soviet Union while he was spying for the United States
- Bharat is natural ally of Soviet Union … Ambassador Lakshmi Pandit
- Bharat is impotent and is in swaddling clothes. For this reason, it cannot commit publicly participate in war. But one day it would … Ambassador Lakshmi Pandit 


Jafar Syed
M.A., LL.B.
Researcher – International Affairs
New York


Do not believe when the drumbeaters deceive the world by claiming that after overwhelming response, Delhi vows to be voice of reason at Security Council. Do not believe that when Indian External Affairs Minister S M Krishna deceives the world by claiming  that India will be a voice of moderation; India’s membership would be good for the world; India is now being understood by the rest of world; or Non-alignment is one the pillars of India’s foreign policy. Do not believe that when Bharti Foreign Minister brags that we [Bharat] will demonstrate to the international community that India on the Security Council is good for the World and India offers a unique and unparalleled example of nation-building.

Bharat was not the voice of reason and will not be voice of moderation, voice of moderation and good for the world. Non-alignment was not the pillar of the Bharti foreign policy and its ‘selection’ to the Security Council is not good for the world.


Since 1947, Bharat has been the secret agent of the United States. Since 1947, its leadership, its journalists, its intellectuals and its writers have been fooling the world that Bharat stands for the occupied world. Its membership in the Non-alignment was to subvert the movement, to mask its real identity and to get credibility by the occupied nations.


Proof? Declassified documents of the United States. These documents prove any doubt that Bharati leadership was the secret agent of America. It did not start today. The first secret agent of the United States was Prime Minister Nehru. His sister, Lakshami Pandit, ambassador to the Soviet Union was the listen post of the America in Moscow.


This is not the only documents which unmask Nehru as the spy of the US. There are hundreds of documents that prove that Bharti leadership was not for the occupied world. Continued occupation of Kashmir by the Bharti leadership is another proof that Bharti leadership was and is the agent of India. In the past it was secret agent. But now it is openly sides with the United. Because Bharat is no more “impotent” [Pandit Lakshami own words] and is no more in “swaddling clothes” [Pandit Lakshami own words]

Read this secret document and decide yourself. The author of the document is American Ambassador Smith in the Soviet Union. He wrote this letter for the US Secretary of State in March 20, 1948. It is labeled Top Secret.


“512. Can confirm information given by Chinese Ambassador New Delhi to Ambassador Grady on statements of Mrs. Pandit. She has had similar confidential conversation with me and, I believe, with heads of practically all missions in Moscow except Soviet satellites.

“She is obviously much concerned at Molotov’s change in attitude, but there is no real reason why she should be as both British Ambassador and myself had warned her honeymoon period for her would last few months and thereafter she would have to take bitter with sweet, with emphasis on former.



“She asked my advice as to whether, in event public opinion in India further aroused, it would be good move for India to discontinue present relations with USSR, and said public opinion in India so aroused it would probably be difficult to send another chief of mission when she left. I told her I thought it would be tactical disadvantage, as India so close to USSR it should be decided advantage to maintain adequate listening post Moscow.



“She emphasized her brother had been deeply affronted by action and attitude Soviet Ambassador New Delhi. She herself now restricts her attendance at Soviet official functions to about fifteen minutes.



“She informed me Nehru and most Indian leaders had long since made up their minds natural alignment was with west, but that Nehru felt at present in view Indian relative impotence and fact that nation is still in swaddling clothes it would be ridiculous to talk publicity of military participation in event of war. Her belief, which apparently reflects that of brother, is that India’s present role in family of nations should be modest and relatively humble one until nation has solved own internal difficulties.

“Repeated to London as 36. Department repeat to New Delhi. Smith.” (Foreign Relations, 1948, Volume V, India, 499-500)

If one contestant get 187 vote out of 190 votes, if it is not selection what it is?
 


/////////////////////////////////////////////////////////
Martin Luther: Jews are satanic breed
(Jews call our blessed Mary a harlot and her Holy Son a bastard … Martin Luther)
Posted:10.07.2010

Highlights
- Jewish children are taught to hate Christians by their parents and by Jewish rabbis …Martin Luther
- Jewish Rabbis teach that murder of a Christian by a Jew is not a sin … Martin Luther
- Jewish still believe in the teaching of Torah and Talmud which teach the Jews to murder the Christian, steal from Christians and falsify the teachings of New Testament …Martin Luther
- Martin Luther words about satanic-breed and blue-eyed European Jews must be published in every website of the Muslim World. World should know that Jewish bible and Jewish leadership teach their children
- Researches should be published about the syllabus and teaching in the Jewish religious schools about Blessed Virgin Mary (Peace be Upon Her), Prophet Jesus (Peace be Upon Him), and about Christians
- Note the difference between the Muslims and Satanic breed Jews about Blessed Virgin Mary (Peace be Upon Her) and Prophet Jesus (Peace be Upon Him). For Muslim, Blessed Virgin Mary (PBUH) is the respectable mother of Prophet Jesus (PBUH). For satanic-breed Jews, she is a harlot. For Muslim, Jesus is a Prophet. For satanic-breed Jews he is a bastard. Christians wake up. Recognize your enemy. Listen to the words of Martin Luther
- David Duke’s book “Jewish Supremacism” is a documentary history of satanic-breed Jews’ devilish teaching and activities. Every Muslim and Muslim institution must buy this book


Jafar Syed
M.A., LL.B.
Researcher – International Affairs
New York


Martin Luther and Satanic-breed Jews


Muslim leadership in the United States specifically and the leadership of the Muslim World have become serial apologizers after September 11. It was the time to tell the Americans and the world that Americans were paying the price for their leadership’s support of occupation of Muslim Palestine by the satanic-breed and blew-eyed European Jews and occupation of Muslim Kashmir by Brahmins of Bharat. It was the time to tell the Americans and the world that unless the satanic- breed blue-eyed Jewish occupation of Palestine and Brahmin occupation of Kashmir do not end, there will be no peace. It was the time to ask the Americans and the world that who is a terrorist? Races who occupy nations or the occupied nations who are struggling to free their land from occupiers are terrorists?


But Muslim leadership of America and Muslim leadership of the Muslim World did not educate the Americans and the world after September 11. Result? Eventually the religion of the Muslim World became the target of the hired-junkyard dogs of the satanic-breed blue-Eyed European Jews and Brahmins.


It is true that it is very late but it is still worth that Muslim leadership in America and the Muslim leadership of Muslim World should educate the Americans and the world that the satanic-breed, blue-eyed European Jews and Brahmins  are the terrorists who are occupying Muslim Palestinians and Muslim Kashmiris. It is still worth that Muslim leadership should educate the Americans and the world what the satanic-breed, blue-eyed European Jewish bible claims about the Blessed Virgin Mary (Peace be Upon Her) and Prophet Jesus (Peace be Upon Him). It is still worth that Muslim leadership should educate the Christians what Christian leadership has been has been saying about the blue-eyed, satanic-breed Jews. It is still worth that the Muslim leadership should educate the Americans and the world what blue-eyed, satanic-breed Jewish bible and blue-eyed and satanic –breed Jewish religious leadership have been have been preaching about Blessed Virgin Mary (Peace be Upon Her) and Jesus (Peace be Upon Him).


Every Muslim should translate the following passages into his own language and circulate among Muslims. These passages must be posted on the websites in the Muslim World.


“They [Jewish children] have been taught so much deadly hatred against the Gentiles [Christians] by their parents [Jews] and Rabbis [Jewish leadership] since their earliest youth and continue to feed their hate during all the years of their lives, and this hatred has saturated their very blood and flesh, fills the very Marrow of their bones and has become inseparable from their whole beings (Weimar, 53 pgs. 482- 483)


“Their Talmud and their Rabbis teach them that a murder shall not be regarded as a sin whenever a Jew kills a Gentile, but only if Jew murders a brother in Israel. Neither is it a sin to break an oath sworn to a Gentile … The Jews of our days still keep to these doctrines and follow the example of their father, taking every opportunity to practice their deliberately false interpretation of the Lord’s word, their avariciousness, their usury, their thefts, their murders and cheat their children to do likewise (W.53, 489-91)


“Maybe mild-hearted and gentile Christians will believe I am too rigorous and drastic against the poor, afflicted Jews, believing that I ridicule them and treat them with such sarcasm. By my word, I am far too weak to be able to ridicule such a satanic breed. W.32, pg.286

“You should know that the Jews blaspheme and violate the name of our Savior day for day … they are our public enemies and incessantly blaspheme our Lord Jesus Christ, they call our blessed Mary a harlot and her Holy Son a bastard and to us they give the epithet of Changelings and abortions. If they could kill us all they would gladly do so, in fact, many murder Christians … (Luther’s last day sermon, a few days before his death in February 1546) (Erlanger 62, pg. 189)      ( David Duke, Jewish Supremacism, My awakening to the Jewish Question, pgs. 68-69) 
//////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////
Jews play the dirty trick again: Jewish Berry Obama is portrayed as anti-Jews


Highlights

- What Rabbi Ovadia Yousef preaches is what teaches Jewish Bible. (Congressman Poe: Jews First, Christians go to hell!, muslimdailyny.org)
- Every word which is spoken in favor of occupied Palestinians is intended to mange the public opinion and to fool the Muslim World.
-  The remarks of Rabbi Yousef gave a racist and a blood-thirsty “Jewish top dog” like Bibi to portray himself as peace maker and fool the world. The phrase “top dog” has been borrowed from anti-Muslim gutter Jewish “Jihad watch.” (Obama: Israel is the 51st state of the United States, muslimdailyny.org)
- “Jewish spy” Secretary Clinton laments the renaming of central Public Square in honor of Dalal Mughrabi. Secretary Clinton is a Jewish spy. Patrick Buchanan website is quoted by the Jewish sources.
- State Department of Jewish Secretary Clinton also condemns the renaming of central Public Square in Honor of Dalal Zughrabi.
- Jewish blood in the veins of political leaders becomes the success card in American politics
-  Rented PA leadership by the Jews praises the freedom fighter to curry favor 
- Jews are portraying Jewish Henry Clinton as anti-Jewish. Remember the Jewish dirty trick- portraying its own as pro-Palestinians. 
- Who are they who are not forgiven even after their deaths by Jews
- State Department is depicted by the Jews as anti- Jews.
- In the Jewish occupied tyrannical world, Muslim cannot thanks their martyrs
- Note what President Carter means by “peace.” In real world, it is the recognition and legitimization of occupation by European Jews.
- Obama Jewish roots. Rush Lamba calls Obama as “Imam Obama.”   

- No President of the United States and no leader in the world have harmed the occupied Palestinians  more than President Carter


Jafar Syed
M.A., LL.B.
Researcher – International Affairs
New York


There are more than fifty tricks which Jews play to hide their hidden agenda and to maintain their tyrannical world-wide occupation. One of the dirty tricks which are played by the Jews is to paint their protectors, lackeys and foot-soldiers as anti-Jews. Jewish lap-dog Jewish Berry Obama is one of those who are painted by the Jews as anti-Jews.  Fact is that Jewish Berry Obama is the product of the Jews. Fact is that airing of so-called differences between Obama and Bibi was to fool the Muslim World. (Israel is the 51st state if Israel. muslimdailyny.org). Fact is that recent “peace initiative” is to mange the public opinion before the destruction of another Muslim country – Iran. Therefore, the world should not be fooled for the recent grilling of Jewish Berry Obama’s administration by the Jews for criticizing the remarks by Rabbi Ovadia Yousef  “We regret and condemn the inflammatory statements by Rabbi Ovadia Yusef which are not only deeply offensive, but incitement such as this hurts the cause of peace. As we move forward to re-launch peace negotiations, it is important that actions by people on all sides help to advance our effort, not hinder it.” (The Jewish Press Editorial Board, Compare and Contrast, September 01, 2010)


For this condemnation, Weekly Jewish Press got a chance to play the dirty trick again and painted the Jewish water carrier Jewish Berry Obama as anti-Jews. In its editorial of    September, 1, 2010, it enlisted the “sins” of the Palestinians and ‘indifferences’ of Jewish Berry Obama. Jewish Berry Obama is asked where was he when PA renamed a central public square in Ramallah in honor of Dalal Mughrabi? Where was Jewish Berry Obama when President Abbas expressed condolences on the death of Muhammad Douud Qudeh? Where was Jewish Berry Obama when state funeral was arranged for Salam Fayyad Amin al Hindi by the PA?

World should know:

 1. Jewish Bible teaches death and destruction
What Rabbi Ovadia Yousef preaches is what teaches Jewish Bible. (Congressman Poe: Jews First, Christians go to hell!, muslimdailyny.org) "May those who hate us be finished." He then reportedly noted that PA President Mahmoud Abbas and the Palestinians hate Israel and that God should therefore bring a plague upon them. (The Jewish Press Editorial Board, Compare and Contrast, September 01, 2010)


2. Muslim world has to pay for every pro-Palestinian word
Every word which is spoken in favor of occupied Palestinians is intended to mange the public opinion and to fool the Muslim World. Second, in the form of surrendering their rights, Palestinians have to pay the price for every pro-Palestinian word which is spoken by American leadership. Cases in point are so called  “pro-Palestinians” Presidents Carter and Clinton. Now add Jewish Berry Obama’s administration. “We regret and condemn the inflammatory statements by Rabbi Ovadia Yosef which are not only deeply offensive, but incitement such as this hurts the cause of peace. As we move forward to re-launch peace negotiations, it is important that actions by people on all sides help to advance our effort, not hinder it …  State Department  (The Jewish Press Editorial Board, Compare and Contrast, September 01, 2010)


3.  Note who is singing peace songs
The remarks of Rabbi Yousef gave a racist and a blood-thirsty “Jewish top dog” like Bibi to portray himself as peace maker and fool the world. The phrase “top dog” has been borrowed from anti-Muslim gutter Jewish “Jihad watch.” (Obama: Israel is the 51st state of the United States, muslimdailyny.org) “The words of the rabbi do not reflect my approach or the position of the Israeli government. Israel comes to the negotiating table out of a desire to proceed with the Palestinians to an agreement that would end the conflict and ensure peace, security and good neighborly relations.” (The Jewish Press Editorial Board, Compare and Contrast, September 01, 2010)


4. “Jewish spy” Secretary Clinton shows her real colors

“Jewish spy” Secretary Clinton laments the renaming of central Public Square in honor of Dalal Mughrabi. "glorifies violence and insult the families on both sides [emphasis added] who have lost loved ones over the years in this conflict."  (The Jewish Press Editorial Board, Compare and Contrast, September 01, 2010)


5. Secretary Clinton is a Jewish spy. Patrick Buchanan website is quoted by the Jewish sources.


6. State Department of Jewish Secretary Clinton also condemns the renaming of central public
square in Honor of Dalal Zughrabi. “We strongly condemn the glorification of terrorists. Honoring terrorists who have murdered innocent civilians, wither by official statements or by dedication of public places, hurts peace efforts and must end. We will continue to hold Palestinian leaders accountable for incitement.”  State Department spoke person PJ Crowley (The Jewish Press Editorial Board, Compare and Contrast, September 01, 2010)


7. Jewish blood in the veins of political leaders becomes the success card in American politics

“(AP) In New York, where one of every eight voters is Jewish, it certainly won't hurt that First Lady Hillary Rodham Clinton can note the Jewish branch on her family tree. Mrs. Clinton, who is Methodist, "has very fond childhood memories" of the second husband of her grandmother, Max Rosenberg, a Russian-born Jew, said Howard Wolfson, a spokesman for the first lady's Senate exploratory committee. http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/1999/08/06/politics/main57322.shtml accessed on  09/10/2010


8. Rented PA leadership by the Jews praises the freedom fighter. Statement like this are sanctioned statements. Jewish occupiers allow the traitors in the occupied camp to be credible in the eyes of their people who considered them stooge of Jewish occupiers. History of Palestine had been different if two segments of Palestinians would have been standing together against the Jewish occupation “The deceased was one of the prominent leaders of the Fatah movement and lived a life filled with the struggle, devoted effort, and the enormous sacrifice of the deceased for the sake of the legitimate problems of his people, in many spheres. He was at the forefront on every battlefield, with the aim of defending the [Palestinian] revolution. What a wonderful brother, companion, tough and stubborn, relentless fighter.  [Emphasis added] President Mahmood Abbas (The Jewish Press Editorial Board, Compare and Contrast, September 01, 2010)


9. Jews are portraying Jewish Henry Clinton as anti-Jewish. Remember the Jewish dirty trick- portraying its own as pro-Palestinians.  "President Mahmoud Abbas attended the funeral, reciting passages of the Quran in al-Hindi's honor." Not a word has been heard from Secretary Clinton's shop. (The Jewish Press Editorial Board, Compare and Contrast, September 01, 2010)


10. Who are they who are not even forgiven even after their deaths by Jews: 1. Dalal Mugharabi who sacrificed her life and blow up 38 Jewish occupiers with her in 1978.  2. Muhammad Daoud Qudeh who taught a lesson to the Jews athletes in Munich Olympic heroic act in 1972.  3. Amin al Hindi allegedly linked with Munich Olympic.


11. State Department is depicted by the Jews as anti- Jews. “And of course there's the continuing incitement against Israel contained in official Palestinian text books and the vituperation that regularly streams from the Palestinian mosques that are closely regulated by the PA. And, as documented by Palestinian Media Watch, the approximately 100 places and events in Palestinian Authority-controlled areas named for some 46 terrorists. All greeted with silence from the State Department. (The Jewish Press Editorial Board, Compare and Contrast, September 01, 2010)


12. Note what President Carter means by “peace.” In real world, it is the recognition and legitimization of occupation by European Jews. “So, the first prerequisite of a lasting peace is the recognition of Israel by her neighbors, Israel's right to exist, Israel's right to exist permanently, Israel's right to exist in peace. That means that over a period of months or years that the borders between Israel and Syria, Israel and Lebanon, Israel and Jordan, Israel and Egypt must be opened up to travel, to tourism, to cultural, exchange, to trade, so that no matter who the leaders might be in those countries, the people themselves will have formed a mutual understanding and comprehension and a sense of a common purpose to avoid the repetitious wars and death that have afflicted that region so long. That's the first prerequisite of peace. (President Carter Discusses the Resolution of the Arab-Israeli Conflict, Jewish Virtual Library, March 16, 1977)


13. Obama Jewish roots. Rush Lamba calls Obama as “Imam Obama.” He cannot dare to call Obama as Rabbi Obama or Jewish Obama. If he does, he will be toasted like Patrick Buchanan.

14. “Obama's Jewish Grandfather, October 7, 2009 Baruch Obama's grandfather, Stanley "Dunham")

by Henry Makow, Ph.D. (Updates in BOLD). If you Google "America's First Jewish President," you'll find links to many Jewish publications "kvelling" (yiddish for boasting)  about how Barack Obama was sponsored by Jews and is "one of us."  This may be literally true. I suspect his mother's father Stanley "Dunham" was Jewish. Obama's mother "Stanley Anne Dunham" certainly looked and acted like a Communist Jew. (My first mother-in-law was one.)

 “As we have seen, the modus operandi of the Satanic Sabbatean Frankist cult (Illuminati) is to intermarry and impersonate all other religions, ideologies and nationalities. Reinhard Heydrich's grandfather was Jewish. Hitler's grandfather was Jewish. Churchill's mother was half-Jewish.  Sonya Sottomayer parades as a "Latina" but her mother was Jewish.  It wasn't just Jewish actors in Hollywood who changed their name and their persona. The object is power. By controlling all sides, they create divisions, chaos and war. “Ultimately the aim is to destroy Western civilization and bring about the New (Communist, some say Jewish) World Order.  Yet paradoxically, they plot to exterminate Jews who don't subscribe to their agenda.

”To call Barrack Obama "America's First Jewish President" is disingenuous. Many other presidents are rumored to have had Jewish blood: Theodore Roosevelt, FDR, Truman, Eisenhower, Johnson and the Bushes to name a few. So it's not surprising to read in Wikipedia that, Stanley Dunham, a lowly furniture salesman from Kansas was related to six US Presidents.

"Stanley Armour Dunham's distant cousins include six US presidents: James Madison, Harry Truman, Lyndon Johnson, Jimmy Carter, George H. W. Bush and George W. Bush.  Through a common ancestor, Mareen Duvall, ...Stanley Dunham is related to former Vice-President Dick Cheney (an eighth cousin once removed). Through another common ancestor, Hans Gutknecht, ...Stanley Dunham is President Harry S. Truman's fourth cousin, twice removed."

 “In contrast to her husband, non-Jew Madelyn Payne Dunham is related to no Presidents. Wikipedia waxes on about Stanley's "Irish" antecedents but my Jew-dar isn't buying it .Other clues. Stanley's mother Ruth ( a common Jewish name) Lucille Armour committed suicide when Stanley was eight-years-old. His father abandoned him and his brother to their grandparents. What would cause a mother of two boys to commit suicide?

"As a furniture salesman, Stanley was described as "gregarious, friendly, impetuous, challenging and loud...could charm the legs off a couch."  Stanley Dunham and his wife Madelyn (not Jewish) raised Barrack from age 10 in Honolulu in the 1970's. Although Madelyn didn't have a university degree, she became Vice-President of a bank. Madelyn and Stanley are described as "Methodists." But Barrack was raised as a "Unitarian" which like Freemasonry and Judaism, doesn't require members to believe in God. It is yet another stalking horse for the NWO.

"Obama's mother, "Stanley Anne", became a Communist and fought the "Establishment," not realising the Communists ARE the Establishment.  She allowed a Communist degenerate Frank Davis to take pornographic pictures of her, which are on the Internet. (Google Images) Davis boasted of bedding white women and some believe Davis is Obama's real father. Certainly Barack Obama Sr. didn't waste any time abandoning mother and son.

"Stanley Anne" was an "idealistic" part-Jewish woman who got her Ph.D. and worked for Timothy Geitner's father in Indonesia at the elite Ford Foundation. Some suspect she did double time for the CIA.

 “ROTHSCHILD'S CHOICE

"My interest in Obama's antecedents was piqued by Texe Marr's new DVD about Barack Obama called "Rothschild's Choice."  Packing the punch of an old fashioned sermon, this DVD demonstrates convincingly that Barack Obama's role is to roll America into a Jew World Order. Anyone wishing to understand "anti-Semitism" need go no further than this video which I recommend to Jews and non-Jews alike. It's a disgrace that America has produced only a handful of courageous and effective defenders like Texe Marrs.

"Although Jews make up no more than 2.5 % of the US population, Marrs shows how Jews (and Israel) dominate business and government, not to mention entertainment to the detriment of Americans. The recent credit crisis is portrayed as outright theft from the US taxpayer by Jewish bankers.

 the US taxpayer by Jewish bankers.
   “Although I considered myself well versed on the subject, the video contained a lot of new information. For example I wasn't aware that the whole American Black leadership are Prince Hall Masons like Barack Obama, and therefore instruments of the Illuminati Jewish bankers.
http://www.savethemales.ca/is_obama_literally_americas_fi.html


15. No President of the United States and no leader in the world have harmed more than the Palestinian cause then President Carter. He alienated the brave Egyptian nation from the cause of Palestinians and purchased the Egyptian leadership. Read what benefits the Jewish occupiers of Palestinian reaped from so-called peace. Jews still paint this protector of Jewish occupiers as enemy to muffle the truth. “It was the first time that the vast stretch of territory from the headwaters of the Jordan to the source of the Nile had become an area of peace; that the only land link between Africa and Asia – the Sinai desert, so long a barrier – had been transformed into a bridge; that Cairo became the nearest capital accessible to Jerusalem. It was the first time that Israel had breached the wall of regional segregation and attained Arab recognition of its sovereign legitimacy; and the first time that the cry of battle had given way to the vow of ‘no more war’.” (Gideon Rafael, Destination Peace, Page x-i)

Note: The main objective of all the articles, which are posted on muslimdailyny.org, is to give the readers the solid facts in the form of quotes and their sources. Whenever you quote the statements, please give reference of Muslimdailyny.org. Thank you and join the movement to end the Jewish tyranny which has come full circle.

 

 

 
 

////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////
Jews lynch Patrick J. Buchanan
(Jewish Nose and freedom of speech. Freedom of speech ends where the Jewish nose begins) Jews lynching No. 2 09/05/2010

Highlights
- In the name of freedom of expression, you can demonize Christian and Muslim prophets; you can display 6-Foot Chocolate Jesus Naked (the Post Chronicle, March 29, 2007); you can display Chocolate Jesus. Nude Sculpture Sparks Catholic Fury (The national ledger, March 30, 2007); you can display Holy Virgin Mary as work of art in which people are throwing elephant dung at a picture of Virgin mary (Hillary steps into dung art, BBC News, September 28, 1999);   you can declare One Day Draw Muhammad; You can declare Quran Burn Day; you can distribute T-shirts “Islam of the Devil;  but you cannot pronounce Jewish Supreme court Justice as Ruth (Pause) Bader (Pause) Ginsberg; you cannot mention Wall Street Jewish parasite Goldman Sachs; you cannot described Congress as Israeli-occupied territory; you cannot state that the Israeli Defense Ministry and his amen corner in the United States wanted to eliminate Sadam Hussein; you cannot claim that Hillary Clinton is a spy for Israel; you cannot relish Catholic vs. Jewish antagonism; you cannot criticize the Catholic leadership who scum’s to the pressure of Jewish tyranny; you cannot defends the Nazis; you cannot praise Hitler; you cannot question the validity of holocaust. If you do, you will be branded anti-Jewish. Ground reality is that freedom of expression ends where the Jewish nose begins
 -William Safire of New York Times toasts Pat Buchanan. “Anti-Semitism isn't cut or dried: Lots of Americans grew up hearing anti-Jewish slurs, and many keep some of that with them. William Safire (Buchanan's colleague on the Nixon speechwriting team) put it this way: Buchanan is an extremist whose anti-Semitism would rank at level four or five -- on a scale that has Adolph Hitler at 10 and Black Muslim leader Rev. Louis Farrakhan as a seven. (realchange.org, Pat Buchanan's Skeleton Closet, realchange.org)
-William F. Buckley licks the shoes of Jews when he toasts Pat Buchanan. “Even William F. Buckley reluctantly concluded that Buchanan was an anti-Semite after carefully reviewing dozens of his statements about Jews in a very long National Review article. (realchange.org, Pat Buchanan Skelton Closet)
- Scholar Muravchik also grills Pat Buchanan. “And John Muravchik, a scholar at the American Enterprise Institute, concluded a similar review in Commentary Magazine by saying that "Taken cumulatively, Buchanan's rhetoric about Jews pretty clearly betrays an underlying sense of grievance or irritation." (realchange.org, Pat Buchanan's Skeleton Closet)
- Jews lynch National Security Advisor James L. Jones
 No. 1 (muslimdailyny.org)
- Thin-skin Jewish leadership cannot stomach a joke from a pro-Israeli national security advisor (muslimdailyny.org)
-  Any person who supports the existence of Israel is a racist. It does not matter he is a Christian, a Jew or a Muslim (Muslimdailyny.org)  
-A Taliban militant gets lost and is wandering around the desert looking for water. He finally arrives at a store run by a Jew and asks for water.
“The Jewish vendor tells him he doesn't have any water but can gladly sell him a tie. The Taliban begins to curse and yell at the Jewish storeowner. The Jew, unmoved, offers the rude militant an idea: Beyond the hill, there is a restaurant; they can sell you water. 
“The Taliban keeps cursing and finally leaves toward the hill. An hour later he's back at the tie store. He walks in and tells the merchant: "Your brother tells me I need a tie to get into the restaurant." (Nathan Guttman, James Jones' Jewish joke - funny or inappropriate? The Forward, April 23, 2010)
-Thin-skin Jewish leadership and their paid junk-yard dogs started stoning the National Security advisor - a traitor who believes in “Israel first” and “America second (Muslimdailyny.org)


Jafar Syed
M.A., LL.B.
Researcher – International Affairs
New York


“Not since Thurgood Marshall, 43 years ago, has a Democratic president chosen an African-American. The lone sitting black justice is Clarence Thomas, nominated by George H. W. Bush. And Thomas was made to run a gauntlet by Senate liberals.

“Indeed, of the last seven justices nominated by Democrats JFK, LBJ, Bill Clinton and Barack Obama, one was black, Marshall; one was Puerto Rican, Sonia Sotomayor. The other five were Jews: Arthur Goldberg, Abe Fortas, Ruth Bader Ginsberg, Stephen Breyer and Elena Kagan.

“If Kagan is confirmed, Jews, who represent less than 2 percent of the U.S. population, will have 33 percent of the Supreme Court seats.

“Is this the Democrats' idea of diversity?”  Ask Patrick J. Buchanan, once a “militant Zionist,” in his article “Are liberal anti-WASP. Article was posted on WorldNetDaily.com

Jews could not stomach the obvious facts stated by author and commentator Patrick J. Buchanan about the Jewish monopoly over the American political system. Anti-Defamation League Director Abe Foxman cried foul.

“The column elicited numerous angry responses. Anti-Defamation League Director Abe Foxman issued a statement saying that "Pat Buchanan is a recidivist anti-Semite who never misses an opportunity to show his fangs. His remarks about the Jewish background of Elena Kagan and the religious makeup of the Supreme Court are bigoted and unacceptable in a pluralistic society such as ours." (Pat Buchanan suggests: Too many Jews on U.S. Supreme Court bench.

American conservative political commentator decries Obama nomination of Elena Kagan, laments absence of Protestants in Supreme Court, by Haaretz Service, 16.05.2010)
Pat Buchanan, a great patriot, is demonized by the Jews
It is not the first time that Pat Buchanan, a great patriot, is demonized by the Jews. They are after him for a long time. They wanted to make a political corpse, but he survived the Jewish lunching. Proof of lynching? 

“Anti-Semitism isn't cut or dried: Lots of Americans grew up hearing anti-Jewish slurs, and many keep some of that with them. William Safire (Buchanan's colleague on the Nixon speechwriting team) put it this way: Buchanan is an extremist whose anti-Semitism would rank at level four or five -- on a scale that has Adolph Hitler at 10 and Black Muslim leader Rev. Louis Farrakhan as a seven.
When he attacks the Supreme Court, he always names "Ruth (pause) Bader (pause) Ginsburg", though she is the newest and least influential member. When he attacks Wall Street investment firms, he always names Goldman Sachs, the only major Jewish-run firm in a WASP dominated industry.
He described Congress as "Israeli-occupied territory", and opposed the Gulf War by saying only "the Israeli Defense Ministry and its amen corner in the United States" wanted to fight Saddam Hussein. (Which was crazy, apart from any Jewish angle. Desert Storm was one of the most popular wars in U.S. history.)
And Brock Meeks, reporter for Hotwired, broke the story that Buchanan included in his official World Wide Web page an article claiming that Hillary Clinton is a spy for Israel. After ABC News ran the story, the Buchanan campaign pulled the article off their site. You can see the article, exactly as it appeared on Pat's web site.

Buchanan also seems to relish Catholic vs. Jewish antagonism, one part of pre-Vatican II Catholicism that most Catholics don't miss. During the controversy over a proposed Carmelite convent at Auschwitz, Buchanan wrote some of his most frightening words:
"If U.S. Jewry takes the clucking appeasement of the Catholic cardinalate as indicative of our submission, it is mistaken. When Cardinal O'Connor of New York seeks to soothe the always irate Elie Wiesel by reassuring him, 'there are many Catholics who are anti-Semitic...it's deep within them,' when he declares this 'is not a fight between Catholics and Jews,' he speaks for himself. Be not afraid, Your Eminence; just step aside, there are bishops and priests ready to assume role of defender of the faith."
Appeasement means trying to stall an attacker by making concessions -- what attacks were Catholic groups "appeasing"? What did Pat think the faith should be defended against? The only issue was that Jewish groups thought it disrespectful to build a convent right next to a major Holocaust death camp. The man clearly has a king-sized chip on his shoulder.

Then, of course, there is Buchanan's defense of Nazis, his praise for Hitler,, and his Holocaust revisionism.
It isn't a statement here or there that reveals Buchanan's fixation with Jews -- it's the consistent theme of it that appears in his statements over the years. Even William F. Buckley reluctantly concluded that Buchanan was an anti-Semite after carefully reviewing dozens of his statements about Jews in a very long National Review article. And John Muravchik, a scholar at the American Enterprise Institute, concluded a similar review in Commentary Magazine by saying that "Taken cumulatively, Buchanan's rhetoric about Jews pretty clearly betrays an underlying sense of grievance or irritation."(realchange.org, Pat Buchanan’s skelton closet)
Study is required urgently that how many voices who dared to challenge the Jewish tyranny have been silenced by the Jews in the United Stated and beyond. Study is needed that when the anti-Christ and anti-Christianity campaign started by the Jews. And remember every moment that Jews does not believe in Christianity and in Islam.  

 

/////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////
U.S.1948 secret documents and auction of Kashmir
(Truman- Nehru unholy alliance exposed – Part 1)


Highlights
- Nehru government is nervous on the question of  Kashmir
- Nehru threatens Pakistan for fueling uprising
- There will be a revolution in Pakistan if Pakistan tries to stop the uprising
- Nehru rejects a neutral administration in Kashmir
- Pakistan is ready to accept the results of  the plebiscite under a neutral administration
- Pakistan is ready to accept an administration  established by Security Council
- Nehru is using the Kashmir issue to backtrack its commitment under Indo-Pakistan financial agreements
- Nehru will use the Kashmir issue to destroy Pakistan in successive stages


Jafar Syed
M.A., LL.B.
Researcher – International Affairs
New York  


It is 1948. Telegram of U.S. Charge Lewis in Pakistan to U.S. Secretary of State highlights the following facts.


1. Anxiety or nervousness exists in Delhi
2. Nehru threatens Pakistan for trouble if Pakistan does not stop aid and abetting Azad Kashmir Government and raiders.
3. There will be a revolution in Pakistan if Pakistan attempts to stop the uprising
4. Pakistan cannot stop the uprising
5. Pakistan welcome the principle of plebiscite in Kashmir
6. Pakistan demands a neutral administration preceding and during plebiscite
7. If the neutral administration is established, Pakistan will convince the Azad Government and the “raiders”  to stop their armed resistance and abide by the result of the plebiscite
8. Neutral government must be agreed upon between India and Pakistan
9. If India does not agree to a mutually agreed upon government, Pakistan will accept an appropriate government established by the UN Security Council
10. India is rejecting any mutually agreed upon neutral administration for Kashmir
11. If India does not agree to a mutually agreed upon neutral administration or UN Security Council’s appointed administration, Pakistan will counter India blaming Pakistan for the uprising. Pakistan will also demands that SC investigate all issues including Junagarh
12. India is using Kashmir issue for backtracking Indo-Pakistan financial agreement and destroying Pakistan in successive stages


What this secret document proves is the conciliatory role of Pakistan for a fair plebiscite under a neutral administration.  It also proves that Nehru is not accepting any neutral administration for Kashmir. Third, India is blaming Pakistan for the uprising. Fourth, Nehru is threatening Pakistan. Fifth, India is using Kashmir issue to starve Pakistan financially. Sixth, Nehru demands that Pakistan crush the uprising otherwise.

Secret Document No. 1 of  1948. 
Contents of the Documents: to be posted 
//////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////
Obama: Jews have the divine right to nuke the world 
! Posted on July 15, 2010 

(Israel is the 51st state of the United States. United States is Israel! Highlights - Muslim leadership of the world, You Fools, Obama has an excellent one-on-one discussion with the “top dog” of Israel, Netanyahu Well, I just completed an excellent one-on-one discussion with Prime Minister Netanyahu, and I want to welcome him back to the White House.”     
 
- Muslim leadership of the world, You Fools, Obama- Netanyahu bond marks one more chapter between two occupying powers. “I want to, first of all, thank him for the wonderful statement that he made in honor of the Fourth of July, our Independence Day, when he was still in Israel.  And it marked just one more chapter in the extraordinary friendship between our two countries.”
 

(“Top dog” phrase borrowed from Jihad Watch.

Hamas, Hizballah top dogs meet in Lebanon

Gee, what could they be planning? "Mideast: Press, Meshaal Meets Nasrallah In Lebanon," from ANSAmed, July 13 (thanks to Insubria):(ANSAmed) - BEIRUT, JULY 13 - The leader of the Hamas political office in exile, Khaled Meshaal, has had a meeting in Lebanon with the head of the Shia movement Hezbollah, Hasan Nasrallah. This was reported this morning by the pan-Arab daily al Hayat.) Jihad Watch, accessed July 15, 2010)  -        Muslims leadership of the world, You Fools, bond between the United States and Israel is unbreakable . “As Prime Minister Netanyahu indicated in his speech, the bond between the United States and Israel is unbreakable.  It encompasses our national security interests, our strategic interests, but most importantly, the bond of two democracies who share a common set of values and whose people have grown closer and closer as time goes on.-        Muslim leadership of the world, You Fools,  Obama praises the “top dog” of Israel for allowing more goods into Gaza. “During our discussions in our private meeting we covered a wide range of issues.  We discussed the issue of Gaza, and I commended Prime Minister Netanyahu on the progress that's been made in allowing more goods into Gaza.  We've seen real progress on the ground.  I think it’s been acknowledged that it has moved more quickly and more effectively than many people anticipated.”-        Muslim leadership of the world, You Fools, for Obama, Israel security comes first. “Obviously there’s still tensions and issues there that have to be resolved, but our two countries are working cooperatively together to deal with these issues.  The Quartet has been, I think, very helpful as well.  And we believe that there is a way to make sure that the people of Gaza are able to prosper economically, while Israel is able to maintain its legitimate security needs in not allowing missiles and weapons to get to Hamas.”
 
Muslim leadership of the world, You Fools, Obama takes credit for  toughest sanctions directed at Iran by UN and US. “We discussed the issue of Iran, and we pointed out that as a consequence of some hard work internationally, we have instituted through the U.N. Security Council the toughest sanctions ever directed at an Iranian government.  In addition, last week I signed our own set of sanctions, coming out of the United States Congress, as robust as any that we've ever seen.  Other countries are following suit.  And so we intend to continue to put pressure on Iran to meet its international obligations and to cease the kinds of provocative behavior that has made it a threat to its neighbors and the international community.”-        Muslim leadership of the world, You Fools, listern what Obama says. Netanyahu is for peace. “We had a extensive discussion about the prospects for Middle East peace.  I believe that Prime Minister Netanyahu wants peace. I think he’s willing to take risks for peace.  And during our conversation, he once again reaffirmed his willingness to engage in serious negotiations with the Palestinians around what I think should be the goal not just of the two principals involved, but the entire world, and that is two states living side by side in peace and security. Israel’s security needs met, the Palestinians having a sovereign state that they call their own -- those are goals that have obviously escaped our grasp for decades now.  But now more than ever I think is the time for us to seize on that vision.  And I think that Prime Minister Netanyahu is prepared to do so.  It’s going to be difficult; it’s going to be hard work.  But we've seen already proximity talks taking place.  My envoy, George Mitchell, has helped to organize five of them so far.  We expect those proximity talks to lead to direct talks, and I believe that the government of Israel is prepared to engage in such direct talks, and I commend the Prime Minister for that.”-        Muslim leadership of the world, You Fools, read between the lines. “Confidence measures” is a loaded phrase. It means securing time to establish additional ground realities “There are going to need to be a whole set of confidence-building measures to make sure that people are serious and that we're sending a signal to the region that this isn’t just more talk and more process without action.  I think it is also important to recognize that the Arab states have to be supportive of peace, because, although ultimately this is going to be determined by the Israeli and Palestinian peoples, they can't succeed unless you have the surrounding states having as -- a greater investment in the process than we've seen so far.”-        Muslim leadership of the world, You Fools, Israel has the divine right to be the only nuclear power in the Middle East. This is what incorporatede Obama says. “Finally, we discussed issues that arose out of the Nuclear Nonproliferation Conference.  And I reiterated to the Prime Minister that there is no change in U.S. policy when it comes to these issues.  We strongly believe that, given its size, its history, the region that it’s in, and the threats that are leveled against us -- against it, that Israel has unique security requirements.  It’s got to be able to respond to threats or any combination of threats in the region.  And that's why we remain unwavering in our commitment to Israel’s security.  And the United States will never ask Israel to take any steps that would undermine their security interests.”-        Muslim leadership of the world, You Fools, note, Obama and “top dog” of Israel, Netanyaho are not joined by hyp; they are  perceived in one womb. “So I just want to say once again that I thought the discussion that we had was excellent.  We’ve seen over the last year how our relationship has broadened.  Sometimes it doesn’t get publicized, but on a whole range of issues -- economic, military-to-military, issues related to Israel maintaining its qualitative military edge, intelligence-sharing, how we are able to work together effectively on the international front -- that in fact our relationship is continuing to improve.  And I think a lot of that has to do with the excellent work that the Prime Minister has done.  So I’m grateful.” (All excerpts are from Obama-Netanyaho joint press conference of July 6, 2010)Jafar Syed M.A., LL.B.Researcher – International Affairs New York  In the Joint Conference of July 06, 2010, President Obama slapped in the face of the Muslim leadership of the world. Muslim leadership from Afghanistan to Yemen was hoping that Obama’s America will be different from the pro-Jewish and anti-Muslim America. They were wrong. Pro-Jewish and anti-Muslim America’s history did not start with George Washington. It started with the occupation of America by the British occupiers.   Only July 6, 2010, President Obama’s message to the Muslim World was very clear. He did not mince the world. He told the leadership of the Muslims World: You Fools, bond between Israel and US is unbreakable. Israel and U.S. have common national interests, common strategic interests and common set of values. In addition, Israel and US are coming closer and close as time goes on. President Obama told the leadership of the Muslim World:  You Fools, there were no differences between me and Prime Minister Netanyahu. I trusted him even before I was elected as the President of the United States. I never gave cold-shoulder to Prime Minister Netanyahu. I never distanced from Israel. In reality, behind the close doors, on a whole range of issues -- economic, military-to-military, issues related to Israel maintaining its qualitative military edge, intelligence-sharing and on international front, we (Obama and Netanyahu)  have been working effectively.Leadership of the Muslim World, You Fools, Israel will never be denuclarized. It has a divine right to be nucelar.  Oboma ensured Prime Minister Netanyahu  that Israel has unique security requirements. He strongly believes that, given its size, its history, the region that it’s in, and the threats that are leveled against it, Israel has unique security requirements.  It should be able to respond to threats or any combination of threats in the region.  And that's why he remains unwavering in his commitment to Israel’s security.  And the United States will never ask Israel to take any steps that would undermine their security interests.Muslim leadership of the World, You fools, why you do not believe me that I am the president of Isreal first and then of America. Who many more proofs you want that  Israel comes first and then comes America in my administration and in the previous administrations. Muslim leadershiup of the world, You Fools, how many more proofs you need that I am anti-Muslim World. You do not see that I engineered toughest UN sanctions against Iran. I have singed unprecedented US sanctions against Iran. If UN and US sanctions are not enough to stragulate Iran, I am hoping that enslaved word, labeled international community, will join me to strangulate Iran.Muslim leadership of the World, You Fools, respect and thank Prime Minister Netanyahu for allowing goods into Gaza. Respect and thank him for initiating the proximity talk with the Palestinian Authority and he is ready for direct talks. Respect him and thank him for his commitment to peace. 

Muslim leadership of the world, You Fools, how many more decades you will be fooled by the word “peace.” It is the most leathal weapon which is used by an occupying power. Word peace demonize the occupied nation who is resisting the occupation. Read between the lines the peace I am proposing, You Fools.   
//////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////
Jews: merchants of death and destruction
(Jewish bible sanctions death and destruction)
Highlights
- Jews, light to the nations, are in the jails of United States, Russia, France and Britain for illegal arms dealing, forgery, bribery, money laundering and violating UN Security Council embargoes
-  Charged Jews are the ex-murderers of the Israel Defence Forces. They reached mid-level ranks from captain to lieutenant colonel
- Some of the charged Jews are Shimon Naor-Hershkowitz, Gidan Sarig, Ofer Pazof, Yohaman Cohen, Haim Gary, Hanoch Miller, Joseph O Toole
- Find the blood of butchered in Sierra Lone, Venezuela, Peru, Senegal, Niegeria, Gabon, Sri Lanka and Somalia on the hands of the ex- murderers of Israeli army
- Israeli Jews recruit America to do the dirty jobs
- Why are the Jews the most corrupt race in the history of man kind?
- Only view, if merchants of death of destruction have been Muslims, whether hired or not, sky would have been fallen. Not the Muslim of the world but their religion has been tarnished by the electronic and print media


Jafar Syed
M.A., LL.B.
Researcher-International Affairs
New York
07-04-2010

Jewish bible teaches death and destruction. (Congressman Poe, Jews first. Congressman Smith, Jews first. Muslimdailyny.org) So it is not surprising that Jews are involved in selling tools of death and destruction all over the world.

“At least seven Israeli arms dealers are currently in jail in four countries - the United States, Russia, France and Britain - on charges of illegal arms dealing. Some of them are also suspected of crimes such as forgery, bribery, money laundering and violating UN Security Council embargoes. Such arrests are briefly covered in Israel and then forgotten. But they have a cumulative effect that is very damaging to Israel's image, or what remains of it.”  (Yossi Melman, Jewish daily Haaretz, 07.01. 2010)


Some common factors bind these merchants of death and destruction.

“Even though it is doubtful whether those in jail know one another, they have quite a lot in common. All are men in their fifties or sixties. All are well to do (or were in the past), having made most of their money in international arms dealing or in exporting security services and equipment from Israel. They served in the Israel Defense Forces and reached mid-level ranks (from captain to lieutenant colonel), and when they were arrested, they denied the charges. Friends who came to their assistance described them, naturally, as the salt of the earth.” (Haaretz, 07.01. 2010)
There is another thread which weaves these merchants of death and destruction together.   

“All seven are familiar faces in the corridors of the defense establishment, and at one time received arms dealing permits from the Defense Ministry. All sought to "expedite procedures" in violation of local or international laws, and did so out of pure greed. Due to this covetousness, they also fell into traps and can expect to face many years in jail. (Haaretz, 07-01-2010)

See the faces of merchant of death and destruction.

“Shimon Naor-Hershkowitz is detained in France and will apparently be extradited to Romania, where he will serve an 11-year jail sentence. He was convicted of forging documents (end-user certificates) that he used to purchase Romanian arms together with a Romanian partner (who later informed on him to the authorities). The arms were ostensibly destined for Togo, but in reality were sent to rebels in Angola.

“Yair Klein has been held for over a year in a Russian jail, after being arrested there at the behest of Colombia, which wants him on charges of training drug barons' bodyguards. Klein, almost 70, may be the Israeli who comes closest to being a "mercenary" of the ugliest sort. He has previously done jail time in Sierra Leone.

“In a British jail sits Gidon Sarig, 58, who was sentenced several months ago to seven years in prison for selling arms and other combat gear to parties in Venezuela, Peru, Senegal, Nigeria, Gabon and, primarily, Sri Lanka.

“And in January, Ofer Pazaf, 50, the president of a Kfar Sava company that works as an intermediary and represents security consultants and defense industries, was arrested in Las Vegas. Arrested with him were two other Israelis who have lived in the U.S. for several years: Yohanan Cohen, 47, the CEO of a San Francisco company that manufactures security gear, and Haim Gary, 50, the president of a Miami company that functions as a middleman for defense companies.

“All three, along with 20 Americans and people of other nationalities, were arrested in a sting operation by the Federal Bureau of Investigations. One of the agents posed as a representative of the defense minister of an African country and pretended to be looking to purchase arms in return for a bribe - known in the professional lingo as a "commission."

“The latest Israeli to find himself behind bars is Hanoch Miller, 53, who was arrested a few days ago in the United States. Together with his partner, retired U.S. Air Force colonel Joseph O'Toole, he is charged with attempts to obtain and sell thousands of AK-47 (Kalashnikov) rifles to the "government" of Somaliland, a separatist region of northern Somalia. The arms were to have been purchased in the United States and to have been sent on cargo planes to Panama and Bosnia, and from there to Somaliland. But the plan fell through because the third partner, who was supposed to purchase the rifles for Miller and O'Toole, was actually an informer for the customs authorities.

“European sources - security and insurance personnel working in Somalia, who are well acquainted with the area - told Haaretz that this story does not make sense, and that the official version put out by the U.S. authorities may conceal a different story. For instance, the indictment stated that the arms were to have been sent to a city called Bandera in northern Somalia. But a look at a map of Somalia reveals that this name is fictitious: No such place exists in Somalia.”


“Moreover, the shipping documents stated that the cargo was for "the Ministry of Defense of the Somali Republic.
"But the government of the separatist area known as Somaliland does not refer to itself as the "Somali Republic." Ever since the military coup in 1969 that sent the country down the sewer, its official name has been the Democratic Republic of Somalia.

“And above all, there is the question of why the government of Somaliland would need to hire the services of Hanoch Miller, an Israeli arms dealer, when it could easily obtain the arms it needs from the United States or Ethiopia, which both support it. There are several possible answers.

“One is that Miller, who initiated the deal, either intended to supply the arms to one of the armed groups operating in Somalia or was tricked into doing so. Somalia, it must be recalled, is also home to various training camps for global jihad operatives. Indeed, two of the Israeli Arabs arrested in the Galilee this week - on suspicion of murdering a taxi driver and seeking to set up a world jihad cell inspired by Osama Bin Laden's philosophy - flew to Ethiopia (where they were arrested ) in order to infiltrate into Somalia and undergo training in one of these camps.

“The second and equally worrisome possibility is that the arms shipments were a camouflage to enable the planes to land in Somalia, where they would load up with other merchandise that fetches high prices on the streets of Europe. Either way, it is doubtful if we will ever know the truth about Hanoch Miller's exploits in Somalia.” (Haaretz, - 07-01-2010)

Jewish government invisible hands have been protecting the merchant of death and destruction.

“The only consolation that those who care about Israel's reputation can find is that if in the past, the supposed creme de la creme of Israeli society would quickly receive high-profile assistance from government officials, ministers (like Ephraim Sneh on behalf of Naor-Hershkowitz ) and former comrades in arms, this time - apparently because of Israel's commitment to adopt the norms of the OECD, which it recently joined - the arms dealers are attracting only low-key interest and getting assistance from relatives and close friends alone.”(Haaretz, 07-01-2010)
Only view if merchants of death of destruction have been Muslims, whether hired or not, sky would have fallen. Not the Muslim of the world but their religion has been tarnished by the electronic and print media.


/////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////
Congressman Poe: Jews first. Christians go to hell!
 (A Hitler-like leader is required to liberate American nation from the Jewish tyranny)


Highlights
- CALLING ON PRESIDENT OBAMA TO STAND UNEQUIVOCALLY WITH ISRAEL … Congressman Smith, Senior Member of the House Foreign Committee. He represents New Jersey’s 4th District (dailymuslimny.org)
- ISRAEL UNDER SIEGE … Congressman Ted Poe. He represents 2nd District, Texas
- A Taliban militant gets lost and is wandering around the desert looking for water. He finally arrives at a store run by a Jew and asks for water … National Security Advisor General James L. Jones (Freedom of speech ends where the Jewish nose begins, muslimdailyny.org)
- Israel first, America go to hell. “I will confess it, at least, like thousands of other typical Jews kids of my generation, I was reared as a Jewish nationalist, even a quasi-separatist … I saluted a foreign flag [Israel], dressed in a uniform reflecting its color[Israel], sang a foreign national anthem [Israel], learned foreign folk songs and dances [Israel], and was taught that Israel was the true homeland … I was taught the superiority of my people to the gentiles [Christians] who had oppressed us … People [Christians]  less sensitive, intelligent, and moral than ourselves. We [Jews] were also taught that the lesson of our dark history is that we could rely on no one …” Stephen Steinlight, head of National Affairs for the American Jewish Committee (David Duke, Jewish Supremacism, My Awakening to the Jewish Question, P. cover of the book) 
- Jews occupy the world. “Steinlight’s statement reveals a Jewish Supremacism that few dare to criticize. Those who state that other races are less intelligent, sensitive and moral are usually pilloried by the media. Imagine the media outrage to such a supremacist statement from any White politician. Jewish supremacists who dominate the mass media have carefully hidden from public view both the ideology and the power of Jewish Supremacism. Steinlight’s quotation is one only one of hundreds of amazing quotes that David Duke exposes and documents in making this courageous expose of the most powerful racial and religious Supremacism on earth. Duke reveals a powerful element in Israel and elsewhere seeking not only supremacy over the entire world.” (David Duke, Jewish Supremacism, My Awakening to the Jewish Question, P. cover of the book) 
-  Jewish bible, sanctions murder and racism. “Any one who reads the Old Testament with unbiased eyes will readily discern its dominant theme of racial and ethnic Supremacism. There are many blatant expression of ethnic Supremacism.   [1] Israelites are a “chosen people,” chosen by God above all the other people of the world [2] Israelites have a right to rule over the whole world [3] Israelites are commanded to murder all the people of the lands where they intend to live, and to kill all the people of foreign nations that do not submit themselves in slavery [4] Israelites are forbidden to make slaves of their own people, but are encouraged to enslave non-Israelites whom they may pass down as slaves to their descendants for ever [5] Israelites are forbidden to intermarry or ‘mix their seed’ with other people (David Duke, Jewish Supremacism, My Awakening to the Jewish Question, P. 18. For Proof of these quotation, please read the book)
-  Every Muslim must read the book authored by David Duke. Every statement is supported by the documents. This book must be translated in the languages which are spoken in the Muslim World
- Who is this who is advocating for the right of an occupier to murder and is denying the right of an occupied and starved nation to feed itself and its children?
- Who is this who is giving an occupier a license to continue the occupation and is denying an occupied nation to resist the occupation?
- And this hired gun is not alone in Congress. He has one hundred twenty nine others who are sharing his thoughts and are justifying the murderous act of an occupier
- The individual who is endorsing the right of an occupier to murder innocent humanitarians at sea is Congressman Poe of Taxes
- No body in America and the world can challenge the Jewish tyranny without paying the price. Remember the recent victims of they Jewish tyranny. One is legendry Helen Thomas.  One sentence was enough to seal his legendary career. Other is General John. Thin-skin Jews could not tolerate a joke. He has to apologize
- Jewish-hired Congressman Ted Poe of 2nd district of Texas is not the only one who is selling its soul to be on the payroll of the Jews. Note what Chris Smith of New Jersey of 4th District is crowing. “CALLING ON PRESIDENT OBAMA TO STAND UNEQUIVOCALLY WITH ISRAEL …

 

Jafar Syed
M.A., LL.B.

Researcher-International Affairs
New York
06/30/2010

“Madam Speaker, Israel has the absolute right to defend itself. It is under siege. In the north, it has the terrorist group Hezbollah; in the south, it has the terrorist group Hamas, both firing missiles into that Nation. Recently, six ships tried to break a blockade going into Gaza. Israel defends its borders and searches ships to make sure that aid going to Gaza is not from Iran and it is not weapons.

 

“Recently, myself and the gentleman from Michigan (Mr. Peters), along with 128 Members of Congress have tried to make it clear to the White House that the United States should stand with our ally Israel, that we should make it clear to Israel, to America, and the rest of the world that Israel has the absolute right to defend itself in this situation and support the blockade and support their actions of the flotilla. This should be clear to all concerned throughout the world, especially Hamas and Hezbollah.” (Congressman Poe of Texas, ISRAEL UNDER SIEGE -- (House of Representatives - June 16, 2010)

Who is this who is advocating for the right of an occupier to murder and denies the right of an occupied and starved nation to feed itself and its children? Who is this who is labeling organizations who dare to stand with an occupied nation as terrorists? Who is this who is giving an occupier a license to continue the occupation and is denying an occupied nation to resist the occupation? And this hired gun is not alone. He has one hundred twenty nine others who are sharing his thoughts and are justifying the murderous act of an occupier.

The individual who is endorsing the right of an occupier to murder innocent humanitarians at sea is Congressman Poe of Taxes. The individual who is denying the right of an occupied nation to feed itself and its starved children is Congressman Poe of Texas. The individual who is labeling the anti-occupation nations as terrorists is Congressman Poe of Texas. 
Is Congressman Poe of Taxes a mentally retarded person? No. Is Congressman Poe of Taxes cannot distinguish between right and wrong? No.

The fact of the matter is that he is not a pervert; he is not a mentally retarded person; and he has the ability to distinguish between wrong and right.

 

Then why is he not standing with an occupied and starved nation?

The answer is very simple? Occupier nation is Jew. No body in America and the world can challenge the Jewish tyranny without paying the price. Remember the recent victims of they Jewish tyranny. One is legendry Helen Thomas. One sentence was enough to seal his legendary career. Other is General John. Thin-skin Jews could not tolerate a joke. He has to apologize. Second, Jews reward their lap dogs to maintain their world-wide tyranny.   
How much blinded is Congressman Poe of Texas?

Read what he says. He floats the distorted idea that the victims of the Jewish tyranny staged and conspired their own murder.

 

“But this was not humanitarian aid workers that assaulted the Israeli commandos, where 10 of them were hurt. It turns out that their goal was, of course, to have an international incident. The reason being, after these ships were stopped and then allowed to proceed into Gaza, the humanitarian aid was denied and refused by Hamas. Obviously, an international incident that had gone bad for Hamas. (Congressman Poe of Texas, ISRAELUNDER SIEGE -- (House of Representatives - June 16, 2010)

 

Jewish-hired Congressman Ted Poe of 2nd district of Texas is not the only one who is selling its soul to be on the payroll of the Jews. Note what Chris Smith of New Jersey of 4th District is crowing. “CALLING ON PRESIDENT OBAMA TO STAND UNEQUIVOCALLY WITH ISRAEL … Congressman Smith, Senior Member of the House Foreign Committee. He represents New Jersey’s 4th District. For details “Muslimdailyny. Org”

No body can even tell a joke. James L. Jones was lynched by Jews. A Taliban militant gets lost and is wandering around the desert looking for water. He finally arrives at a store run by a Jew and asks for water … National Security Advisor General James L. Jones (Freedom of Speech ends where the Jewish nose begins, Muslimdailyny.org)

Israel first, America go to hell. Jews are Israeli first and then anything.  “I will confess it, at least, like thousands of other typical Jews kids of my generation, I was reared as a Jewish nationalist, even a quasi-separatist … I saluted a foreign flag [Israel], dressed in a uniform reflecting its color[Israel], sang a foreign national anthem [Israel], learned foreign folk songs and dances [Israel], and was taught that Israel was the true homeland … I was taught the superiority of my people to the gentiles [Christians] who had oppressed us … People [Christians]  less sensitive, intelligent, and moral than ourselves. We [Jews] were also taught that the lesson of our dark history is that we could rely on no one …” Stephen Steinlight, head of National Affairs for the American Jewish Committee (David Duke, Jewish Supremacism, My Awakening to the Jewish Question, P. cover of the book) 

 

Jews occupy the world. “Steinlight’s statement reveals a Jewish supremacism that few dare to criticize. Those who state that other races are less intelligent, sensitive and moral are usually pilloried by the media. Imagine the media outrage to such a supremacist statement from any White politician. Jewish supremacists who dominate the mass media have carefully hidden from public view both the ideology and the power of Jewish Supremacism. Steinlight’s quotation is one only one of hundreds of amazing quotes that David Duke exposes and documents in making this courageous expose of the most powerful racial and religious Supremacism on earth. Duke reveals a powerful element in Israel and elsewhere seeking not only supremacy over the entire world.” (David Duke, Jewish Supremacism, My Awakening to the Jewish Question, P. cover of the book) 

 

Jewish bible sanctions murder and racism. “Any one who reads the Old Testament with unbiased eyes will readily discern its dominant theme of racial and ethnic supremacism. There are many blatant expression of ethnic Supremacism.   [1] Israelites are a “chosen people,” chosen by God above all the other people of the world [2] Israelites have a right to rule over the whole world [3] Israelites are commanded to murder all the people of the lands when they intend to live, and to kill all the people of foreign nations that do not submit themselves in slavery [4] Israelites are forbidden to make slaves of their own people, but are encouraged to enslave non-Israelites whom they may pass down as slaves to their descendants for ever [5] Israelites are forbidden to intermarry or ‘mix their seed’ with other people (David Duke, Jewish Supremacism, My Awakening to the Jewish Question, P. 18) ( For other quotes, please visit A Hitler-like leader is required muslimdailyny.org) 

Muslim world must be constantly educated about the Jewish tyranny. Every Muslim must read the book authored by David Duke. Every statement is supported by documents. This book must be translated in the languages which are spoken in the Muslim World
 

Last word. It is incumbent on every human being to stand against the Jewish tyranny. This is the only way to save the world and its inhabitants. Note their role in the First World War and Second World War. Note their role in the destruction of Iraq. Note their role in the destruction of Afghanistan. Note their role for strangulation of Iran.
 

///////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////
Congressman Smith: Jews first. Christians go to hell!
 (A Hitler-like leader is required to liberate American nation from the Jewish tyranny)


Highlights
- The administration should emphasize that Israel's action was legal, that it was right, and that the U.S. stands with Israel without any ifs, ands, or buts, or so long as, or any other qualifiers …Congressman Smith
- Slaughter of Deir Yasin, Sabra and Shatila did not quench the bloody thirst of Jews. Murderous Jews write another chapter in the slaughter of human beings
- Make no mistake about it, the purpose of the flotilla was to provoke an incident, thereby to set up an international media campaign against Israel. The flotilla was an aggressive and hypocritical attempt to manipulate world public opinion and to isolate Israel …Congressman Smith
-  Response of the Israeli Government was extraordinarily restrained and responsible. Israeli troops boarded the ships in the flotilla carrying paint ball guns … Congressman Smith
- A Hitler-like leader is required to liberate American nation from the Jewish tyranny.
- Congressman Smith is not the only one who does not hesitate to justify the murders of innocents. And he is not the only congressman whose mantra is Jews first; Christians go to hell. Name any Congressman who dares to challenge the Jewish tyranny!
- You let me have the Jewish vote of New York and I will bring you the head of Ibn Saud on a platter… Jew Barnard Baruch
- Jewish bible sanctions death and destruction: “But in the cities of these people that the Lord your God gives you for an inheritance, you shall save alive nothing that breathes.” (Deuteronomy 20:16)

Jafar Syed
M.A., LL.B.
Researcher – International Affairs
New York 060/27/2010


Israel is under attack by the international media.  Humanitarian aid to blockaded Palestinians was a smoke screen.  The pushers of humanitarian aid had connection with the terrorists. They also provoked the Israelis who boarded the ship. Hamas commits aggression against Israel. For these reasons, President Obama must stand with Israel.

Who is advocating for Israel? He is Jewish-hired lap dog Congressman Smith of New Jersey. He was addressing the Congress on June 16, 2010.    


“I rise today to call on the President to give Israel the unequivocal, robust, and vigorous support it deserves.

“Madam Speaker, the facts of the incident were clear within 48 hours, and it's high time our government sent a much more powerful and unambiguous message, that the United States fully supports Israel's action to intercept the flotilla. The administration should emphasize that Israel's action was legal, that it was right, and that the U.S. stands with Israel without any ifs, ands, or buts, or so long as, or any other qualifiers.
“I call on President Obama to give Israel our government's full support and to make unmistakably clear our government's position that Israel, in its response to the Gaza flotilla, was fully in the right. Whether or not the Israeli Government decides to adjust the blockade, our government must make it perfectly clear to all that we will never permit an anti-Israel media campaign to isolate America's most faithful and trusted friend in the Middle East.” Congressman Smith (CALLING ON PRESIDENT OBAMA TO STAND) UNEQUIVOCALLY WITH ISRAEL -- (House of Representatives - June 16, 2010)

Jewish-hired Congressman Smith laments that International media is grilling the “chosen people” unjustifiably. It is ignoring the fact that pushers of humanitarian aid had a hidden agenda. They wanted to provoke an incident for manipulating the world opinion.


“Since the May 31 Gaza flotilla incident, Israel has been under media attack, and even in the past few days many articles and international newspapers take a grossly anti-Israel slant. Make no mistake about it, the purpose of the flotilla was to provoke an incident, thereby to set up an international media campaign against Israel. The flotilla was an aggressive and hypocritical attempt to manipulate world public opinion and to isolate Israel.” (CALLING ON PRESIDENT OBAMA TO STAND UNEQUIVOCALLY WITH ISRAEL -- (House of Representatives - June 16, 2010)

But Jewish-hired Congressman Smith is smiling ear to ear that anti-Israel world wide propaganda could not open the eyes of the blind-folded Americans.  


“Thankfully, it has not worked in the United D. States, where Rasmussen polling shows that despite the anti-Israel bias of so much media coverage, less than 20 percent of Americans think that the Israeli Government is to blame for the deaths that resulted from the incident. (CALLING ON PRESIDENT OBAMA TO STAND UNEQUIVOCALLY WITH ISRAEL -- (House of Representatives - June 16, 2010)

Jewish-hired Congressman Smith tells the world:  Jewish occupiers of Muslim Palestine offered to cater aid to the starved Palestinians. Flotilla participants said no. Flotilla participants were determined to be murdered by the Jewish occupiers of Palestine. They have documented ties with Hamas. They were not harmless peace activists. Jewish occupiers of Muslim Palestine are under attack by Hamas.  And above all, what Jewish occupiers of the Muslim Palestine did, it is warranted by the international law. 


“It's a matter of record that on May 25 the Israeli Government offered to offload at its port of Ashdod the humanitarian aid the flotilla carried and to have the U.N. personnel deliver it to Gaza. On that same day, the Israeli Government also stated it would not permit the flotilla to break its blockade of Gaza, which is not only legal under international law; but I believe it's also just, given the rampant maritime arms smuggling, the 7,000 rocket attacks Hamas has launched on Israel from Gaza since 2005, and the unlimited aid that can flow to Gaza through proper checkpoints.
“Madam Speaker, the Turkish group that organized the flotilla has documented ties to Hamas, which is recognized by the U.S. Department of State as a foreign terrorist organization. Radicals with ties to other terrorist groups were aboard the ships. The flotilla launch was marked by violent, anti-Semitic rallies. Flotilla participants spoke to al Jazeera of martyrdom and sang intifada songs. All this shows the grotesque hypocrisy of those who would portray the flotilla participants as somehow being harmless peace activists. Nothing could be further from the truth.
“Madam Speaker, the response of the Israeli Government was extraordinarily restrained and responsible. Israeli troops boarded the ships in the flotilla carrying paint ball guns, but when the crew beat them with iron rods, stabbed and lynched them and threw one of them off the deck, they got the order to defend themselves with their side arms. This, too, was right. Every government permits its troops to defend themselves when they are attacked.” (CALLING ON PRESIDENT OBAMA TO STAND UNEQUIVOCALLY WITH ISRAEL -- (House of Representatives - June 16, 2010)

What this twisted view of Jewish-hired Congressman Smith proves? The United States of America is occupied by the Jews. Once they occupied Germany. A Hitler-like leader is required to liberate American nation from the Jewish tyranny. Jewish-hired Congressman Smith is not the only congressman who carries Jewish water. He is not the only one who does not hesitate to justify the murders of innocents. And he is not the only congressman whose mantra is Jews first; Christians go to hell. Name any Congressman who dares to challenge the Jewish tyranny!

Feel the iron grip of the Jewish tyranny on the American political system.


“The only thing which will matter in Washington … is if the people [Jews] of in the Bronx and Brownsville and Borough Park begin to mutter in their beards, they’ll be damned if they continue to cast their votes to a party that breaks its pledges to them … You let me have the Jewish votes on New York and I will bring you the head of Ibn Saud on a platter! The Administration [Roosevelt] will sell all seven Arab states if it is a question of retaining the support … of the Jews of New York alone; never mind the rest of the country … Barnard Baruch, Israel in the Mind of America, Peter Gross, P. 175) 

Jewish bible sanctions death and destruction. Recent murders of the innocent humanitarians should not surprise anybody. Jews have been murdering the natives since time immorial.  Read this what the Jewish bible sanctions.


“The massacres of Canaanites, Jacobites, Philistines, Egyptians, and dozens of other peoples are gruesomely recorded in the Bible. In today’s terminology, we describe the slaughter of entire people as genocide. Old Testament Jews spared neither men, women, children or even the animals and pets of their enemies. The following are just a few among dozens of similar passages found in the Old Testament [Jewish bible]

“And they utterly destroyed all that was in the city, both man and woman, young and old, and ox, and sheep, and ass, with the edge of the sword … (Joshua 6.21)


“The Horam, king of Gezer, came to help Lachish; and Joshua smote him and all his people, until he had left him none remaining.

And they took Eglon, and smote it with the edge of the sword, and all the souls that were therein. (Joshua 10:32-34)

“And they took Hebron, and smote it with the edge of the sword, and the king thereof, and all the cities thereof, and the souls were therein; he left none remaining. (Joshua 10:37)

“For the indignation of the Lord is upon all nations, and his fury upon all their armies: He hath utterly destroyed them. He hath delivered them to the slaughter.
Their slain also shall be cast out, and their stink shall come up out their carcasses, and the mountains shall be melted in their blood. (Isaiah 34:2-3)


“But in the cities of these people that the Lord your God gives you for an inheritance, you shall save alive nothing that breathes (Deuteronomy 20:16) (David Duke, Jewish Supremacism, My Awaking to the Jewish Question, P. 60)

///////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////

Jews lynch National Security Advisor James L. Jones
(Jewish nose and freedom of speech.
Freedom of speech ends where the Jewish nose begins) No. 1`


Highlights

- Thin-skin Jewish leadership cannot stomach a joke from a pro-Israeli national security advisor
-  In the United States, under the banner of freedom of speech, Jews can demonize Christianity, Islam, prophets, and religious communities, but one can not say a single word about the Jews or their devilish acts
- Any person who supports the existence of Israel is a Zionist. It does not matter he is a Christian, a Jew or a Muslim.   Reference: Basel program    
- Conservative media outlets are trying to stir up controversy around a joke that Obama National Security Advisor Jim Jones told during a speech last week … Hoffpost
- Obama's National Security Advisor Tells Joke Depicting Jews as Greedy Merchants … Drudge Report
- Jews are just greedy merchants in the same vein as Shakespeare's Shylock …Conservative publisher Andrew Breibart
- Jewish spindoctors are protraying anti-Muslim, anti-humanity Obama as the enemy of Jewish occupied Muslim Palestine. Do not believe what the Jewish spin doctors are saying. It is one of the Jewish tricks, painting  their puddles as their  enemies to fool the Muslim World: 1.We shall bow down to no one, [even Obama] America’s Jewish leaders must be outspoken in our support of Israel. 2. Unprecedented, unrepeated, As Begin did 30 years ago, Israel should stand to the U.S. Israel have lived 3,700 years without memorandum of understanding with America – and it will continue to live for another 3,700 … Prime Minister Menachem Begin 3. Doomed from the outset, Obama administration’s imposed soluition’s is another mistake. The [Obama] administration has just signaled to the Palestinians that it wants to make indirect talks fail, since then the U.S. government will make an ‘imposed’ offer that will adopt almost all of their demands. 4. Both countries [US and Israel] must bury their differences because the only one who are smiling during this entire episode are the leadership in Iran, who are continuing to move forward a military nuclear program. ( Long Island, Jewish World, April 16-22, 2010). Now compare the spins of Jewish spin doctors with the statement of the stoned National Security Advisor.  “At the same event, Jones spoke at length about America's ties with Israel. An excerpt:America's commitment to Israel will endure. And everyone must know that there is no space--no space--between the United States and Israel when it comes to Israel's security. Our commitment to Israel's security is unshakable. It is as strong as ever. This President and this Administration understands very well the environment--regionally and internationally--in which Israel and the United States must operate. We understand very well that for peace and stability in the Middle East, Israel must be secure. The United States will never waiver in defense of Israel's security. (Jim Jones has apologized for his joke, Hoffpost, May 1, 2010)
- Once a Bharti journalist said that where there is no option, it is coercion. It is also true about Jewish tyranny
  
Jafar Syed
M.A., LL.B.
Researcher – International Affairs

May 03, 2010

In the United States, under the banner of freedom of speech, one can demonize Christianity, Islam, prophets, and religious communities, but you can not say a single word about the Jews or their devilish acts.   

It does not matter that one is a president, a politician, a civil right activist or a professor; one cannot say a single word about Jews and their devilish acts.


If one dares to say a single word about Jews or their devilish acts, he will be hanged in public squire
 
The recent victim of Jewish tyranny is National Security Adviser James L. Jones, a Zionist (any person who supports the existence of Israel is a Zionist. It does not matter he is a Christian, a Jew or a Muslim.  Reference: Basel program). 

What did National Security Advisor for which he is hanged by the Jewish leadership and its puddles? He exposed one of the devilish characteristics of the Jewish character – greed.  He was attending 25-year anniversary gala of the Washington Institute for Near East Policy, a pro-Israeli think tank. Note what he said as a joke.


“A Taliban militant gets lost and is wandering around the desert looking for water. He finally arrives at a store run by a Jew and asks for water.


“The Jewish vendor tells him he doesn't have any water but can gladly sell him a tie. The Taliban begins to curse and yell at the Jewish storeowner. The Jew, unmoved, offers the rude militant an idea: Beyond the hill, there is a restaurant; they can sell you water. 


“The Taliban keeps cursing and finally leaves toward the hill. An hour later he's back at the tie store. He walks in and tells the merchant: "Your brother tells me I need a tie to get into the restaurant." (Nathan Guttman, James Jones' Jewish joke - funny or inappropriate? The Forward, April 23, 2010)

 Thin-skin Jewish leadership and their paid junk-yard dogs started stoning the National Security advisor - a traitor who believes in “Israel first” and “America second.”


“After the speech, two participants suggested, in private conversations with the Forward, that Jones' joke might have been inappropriate. After all, making jokes about greedy Jewish merchants can be seen at times as insensitive.

“A prominent think-tank source who attended the event said the joke was "wrong in so many levels" and that it "demonstrated a lack of sensitivity."  (Nathan Guttman, James Jones' Jewish joke - funny or inappropriate? The Forward, April 23, 2010)


Even the White House felt the heat and deleted the segment of joke from the official transcript. Washington Institute website also deleted the joke.


“The White House transcript sent to reporters after the event did not include the joke and conveniently began a couple of minutes into the speech. The video of the event posted on the Washington Institute Web site also did not include this portion of the speech.


“Luckily, the event was filmed by C-SPAN and several Israeli TV networks, so everything is on record. Just in case anyone feels a need to keep on digging into Jones' sense of humor.” (Nathan Guttman, James Jones' Jewish joke - funny or inappropriate? The Forward, April 23, 2010)

Hoffpost website tells its readers: 


 “Conservative media outlets are trying to stir up controversy around a joke that Obama National Security Advisor Jim Jones told during a speech last week. Speaking before the Washington Institute for Near East Policy -- described by the Israeli paper Ha'aretz as "a well known pro-Israeli forum" -- Jones told a warmly-received joke about a Taliban fighter who insults a Jewish store owner, and then gets tricked by him.

“The video was linked from the Drudge Report with the headline, "VIDEO: Obama's National Security Advisor Tells Joke Depicting Jews as Greedy Merchants." Conservative publisher Andrew Breitbart posted the video with a caption saying the joke "borders on anti-Semitic, teaching the crowd that Jews are just greedy merchants in the same vein as Shakespeare's Shylock." (Jim Jones has apologized for his joke, Hoffpost, May 1, 2010)
The Anti-Defamation League whacks Jones over the joke. “It's inappropriate,” Abe Foxman told ABC News' Jake Tapper. “It's stereotypic. Some people believe they need to start a speech with a joke; this was about the worst kind of joke the head of the National Security Council could have told." (Jim Jones has apologized for his joke, Hoffpost, May 1, 2010)

National Security Advisor buckled under the pressure. He apologized.


“Apparently the criticism of National Security Advisor James L. Jones’ Jewish joke reached the White House.

“On Monday General Jones issued a short statement clarifying his remarks and providing a written apology, provided to reporters by the White House press office:

“I wish that I had not made this off the cuff joke at the top of my remarks, and I apologize to anyone who was offended by it. It also distracted from the larger message I carried that day: that the United States commitment to Israel’s security is sacrosanct.” (Nathan Guttman,   James L. Jones Apologizes for Jewish Joke , Forward, April 26, 2010)

 

Once a Bharti journalist said that where there is no option, it is coercion. It is also true about Jewish tyranny.  
  

///////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////

Part1Palestine. US secret documents: Truman auctions Palestinian nation 
(Understanding the nature of US-Jewish leadership relations is the key to understand the continued Pharaoh-like occupation of Muslim Palestine, destruction of one Muslim country after another and   eventual destruction of the entire Muslim World)

Highlights
- Great Britain was coercing the Muslim World to accept the Jewish occupation of Muslim Palestine …Arab leadership
- There will be blood if US and Great Britain sell Muslim Palestine to the European Jews … Arab leadership
- Truman and Attlee “wins the hearts and minds” of the Muslim World by sponsoring the occupation of Muslim Palestine by European Jewish occupiers
- There will be someone to champion the cause of the occupied. In 1948, it was Saudi Arabia who stood for the occupied Palestinians
- Muslim leadership is worried about the street reaction for legitimizing European Jewish occupation of Muslim Palestine by Truman and Attlee  
- Arabs ready to fight for Palestinians
- American and British leadership knew that they have to pay a very heavy price for gifting  Muslim Palestine to the European Jewish occupiers of Palestine  

 

Jafar Syed
M.A. LL.B.
Researcher – International Affairs
New York

1948. Anti-Muslim World Axis is at work. Anti-Muslim World Truman (Democrat, 1945-1953) and Prime Minister Attlee (Labor, 1945-1951) are sponsoring the occupation of Muslim Palestine and Muslim Kashmir by the anti-Muslim European Jewish leadership and anti-Muslim Hindu leadership.

For the auction of Kashmir, please visit the website muslimdailyny.org, article 1 to 5.  

Document No. 1. Top secret document No. 1 of 5th January, 1948, reveals the following facts. 1. British shameful role to force the occupied leaderships of Iraq, Syria, Transjordan and Lebanon to accept the occupation of Muslim Palestine by the European Jews. 2. Truman administration and Attlee government is worried about the reaction of the Muslim world about the gifting of the Muslim Palestine to the European Jewish occupiers of Palestine. (Reference:  UN partition plan) 3. Jordanian leadership was not honest to the Palestinian cause. 4. There will be blood if US and Great Britain sell Muslim Palestine to the European Jews … Arab leadership 5. Truman and Attlee “wins the hearts and minds” of the Muslim World by sponsoring the occupation of Muslim Palestine by European Jewish occupiers 6. Arabs ready to fight for Palestinians 7. American and British leadership knows that they have to pay a very heavy price for gifting Muslim Palestine to the European Jewish occupiers of Muslim Palestine 8.There will be someone to champion the cause of the occupied. In 1948, it was Saudi Arabia who stood for the occupied Palestinians
 

All excerpts are from the top secret memorandum, 867N.01/1-548, F2/-/47, Washington, 5th January, 1948, from the British Embassy to the Department of State, Israel, Interest of the United States in the Arab-Israeli controversy over the future of status of Palestine; The issue at the United Nations; Creation of the State of Israel; Entry of Arab forces into Palestine, Foreign Relations, 1948, Volume V, P 533- 536)
 
Britain coerces the Muslim World to accept the European Jewish occupation of Muslim Palestine

“During a conversation between Mr. Bevin (Ernest Bevin, British Secretary of State for Foreign Affairs) and Mr. Marshall in London on the 17th December, Mr. Bevin said that the reactions of the Arab Governments to the recommendations of the United Nations on Palestine had been worse than he had expected, in spite of the efforts which were being made by British representatives in the Arab States to bring the Governments concerned to a more reasonable frame of mind. Mr. Bevin added that he was proposing to see Arab representatives in London, one by one, in order to steady them. The British Government feared that the situation in the Middle East might get out of control and seriously endanger the U.S. and British position there, which could only benefit the Soviet Union.

“2. In amplification of Mr. Bevin’s remarks, and the spirit of the recent conversations on the Middle East between United States and United Kingdom representatives, the following summary is provided for the strictly confidential information of the State Department, of the views on Palestine which have in the last few weeks been expressed to British officials by Arab representatives in the countries concerned. These views were mostly elicited in conversation at which representatives informed the Arab Governments in general terms of British plan for withdrawal from Palestine and urged that Arab leaders should take no action which might render the British task more difficult. The following were the main points which emerged.

“ (a) All the Arab representatives were willing to give an assurance that they would avoid action of any kind likely to bring them into conflict with the British Government during the period of withdrawal; but it is clear that it would be dangerous to make any assumption that Arab opposition to partition  is mainly wild talk

“(b) The Arab Governments do not believe that they can restrain there nations form volunteering for service in Palestine. This was mentioned, for example by the Egyptian Minister of Foreign Affairs Foreign Affairs, by the Acting Prime Minister of Iraq, by Riad Sulh (prime minister, Lebanon), by Jamil Mardam (prime minister, Syria) and by Samir Pasha (prime minister, Transjordan)”

European Jewish occupiers of Palestine slaughter the Palestinians

“(c) There is much concern whether restraint is also being urged upon the Jews. This was mentioned for example, by the Egyptians Minister of Foreign Affairs and by Yusef Yasin (Saudi Arabia). This concern is likely to be increased as a result of the recent disturbances in Palestine in which Arab casualties have been somewhat larger than Jewish casualties.

Truman and Attlee win the heart and mind of the Muslim World by sponsoring the occupation of Muslim Palestine by European Jewish occupiers

“(d) Considerable bitterness was expressed against the British Government for having adopted a neutral attitude in New York, and more especially against the United States Government for their more positive stand in favor of partition. Such criticism of the American attitude, which was sometimes stated in terms of general references to “dollar diplomacy” and of the consequent need for friendship specifically with Britain, may in part have been actuated by a desire to play off Britain against the United States.”

There will be someone to champion the cause of the occupied. In 1948, it was Saudi Arabia who stood for the occupied Palestinians

“(e) It is clear that any attempt to provide for mutual defence arrangement in the Middle East is likely to meet with the great difficulties. Riad Sulh, for example, urged that the whole Middle East was changing and that the time had surely come for the British Government to consolidate their friendship with the Arabs. The British Government’s treaties with Iraq and Egypt were under consideration for revision and what use could that with Transjordan be, if Palestine was lost. He considered that the British Government should come to some agreement with the Arabs as a whole and, as it were, capitalise their good will. He deplored any idea that Anglo-Arab relations should be exposed to too great a strain, through what would seem to the Arabs to be British support for partition, and he asserted that his sentiments were shared by all other Arabs

Muslim leadership is worried about the street reaction for legitimizing European Jewish occupation of Muslim Palestine by Truman and Attlee

“3. There are other indications, such as that mentioned in the following paragraph, that there is a general desire for some kind formal understanding with Great Britain, without which Arab leaders fear that the situation may get out of hand. No Arab representative has yet stated in concrete terms what kind of a lead was required; their plea was in the form of: “Cannot you do something to help us?”

British were foisting Jews on the Arab world … Iraqis 

“4. That this situation may have a bearing on one concrete and very important interest of the British Government (and of the United States Government) – namely a revised Anglo-Iraqi treaty – is indicated by the remarks of Tahsin Qadri, Master of Ceremonies at the Palace in Baghdad, which reflected the deep feeling shown in earlier conversation by Saleh Jabr [Iraqi Prime Minister] and Nuri [Nuri as Said, Iraqi political leader and many times Prime Minister]. He said that for the past thirty years the British had been able to give a line which the Iraqi Government had been able to follow with advantage to both countries, and he could not understand why they should now give the Iraqis no guidance at all except to keep calm. If the British would only give a line, moderate men would support the Regent and the Government in guiding the policy of Iraq. But without any word from the British the situation would go from bad to worse. The enemies of the Regent and of Great Britain would be able to say that the only result of a thirty years’ of alliance was that, if only passively, the British were foisting Jews on the Arab world. The pressure on any Iraqi Government would be so great that the most desperate and dangerous steps would be taken, with disastrous effects on Anglo-Iraqi relations. The situation could not be held, Qadri concluded, unless the British came forward with concrete suggestions which they really were prepared to help the Arabs. The danger to our treaty negotiations, which this situation represents, needs no emphasis and it is evident that this depth of feeling is shared by other Arab leaders.”

Arabs ready to fight for occupied Palestinians

“5. There are a few other items of information which have a bearing on this question. The Transjordan Government is still interested in securing for itself the Arab portion of Palestine and appears to have some hope of doing with the Jews. It does not want troops from other Arab states to pass through its territory, but it may cooperate to some extent with the other members of the Arab League as a result of their recent meeting. At this meeting, according to confidential information received by the British Government, it appears that quotas were agreed upon for the proportion of arms to be supplied by each member. But no decision was reached on the quota of volunteers, the actual number of which it was not felt possible to determine. The activities of the volunteers are to be controlled by Ismail Sawfat, who would be released from Iraqi Army for this purpose, and there are to be local commanders in Palestine.”

American and British leadership knew that they have to pay a very heavy price for presenting Muslim Palestine to the European Jewish occupiers of Palestine  

“6. The remarks of Raid Sulh, as well as those of Tahsin Qadri, clearly indicate the effect which the Palestinian problem may have upon future plans in the Middle East, even through the British Government continue to follow the course already marked out in the statements made by British representatives at Lake Success. They also clearly reveal the great obstacles which will for some time be set in the way of concerted Anglo-American action in the Middle East. It was agreed in the recent talks that Palestine presented special problem. But these Arab reactions again demonstrate that this issue will not only cause further deterioration in the British position, but may well frustrate all plans for Anglo- American support throughout the area.

“7. In the view of the British Government, the situation which is now developing over Palestine thus represents a grave threat to the position of both countries in the Middle East. While the British Government will in no way obstruct the execution of the decisions taken by the United Nations, they intend to do their utmost to preserve their position and influence in that area. In so doing they are working for ends which both Governments have decided, at the highest level, to be in their respective interests. They have already asked the Arab Governments to avoid precipitate action and to restrain their nationals

“8. The British Government are [sic] sure that the United States Government realize the danger to which attention has been drawn. They are sure, too, that the United States Government realize the need for viewing it against the wider international background, if all the efforts which have just been made are not to be in vain. They would therefore be grateful to learn whether the United States Government would be prepared to speak to the Jewish Agency in terms parallel to those of the British representative to the Arabs

“9. It is the hope of the British Government that, as a result of this information, given frankly and in the spirit of the recent talks, the United States Government will share their view that it would be dangerous to underrate Arab resentment. The British Government believe it to be most urgent that, in the common interest of both countries, all possible steps should be taken by the United States Government, not only to reassure the Arabs, but also to persuade the Jews, even though it means to exercise by the latter of considerable restraint, to make good in deeds their words of friendship to the Arabs. Washington, 5th of January, 1948)”
///////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////
Part5. US secret documents: Truman auctions Kashmiri nation

(Understanding the nature of US-Bharat relations is the key to understand the continued pharaoh-like occupation of Kashmir, dismemberment and eventual destruction of remaining Pakistan)

Highlights
-Truman knows that Nehru is the main culprit. Note who is unmasking the truth? He is Austin, The United State representative at the United Nations.

“The whole affairs according to according to my visitors started with the massacre of Moslems instigated by the Prince (Heir Apparent Yuvraj Karansinghji Bahadur). When threatened with reprisals by the troops he took political refuge by requesting the accession of Kashmir to India. ((501. BC 1-848: Telegram, The United States Representative at the United Nations,(Austin) to the Secretary of States, Foreign Relations, 1948, Volume V, P. 275) 
- Nehru is not sincere about plebiscite. Note the conditions attached for conducting the plebiscite

“2.b. India still admits commitments for Kashmir plebiscite but insists that it cannot be held until hostilities stop; popular constituent assembly elected, constitution drafted and popular government elected. At that stage, plebiscite might be held with UN observers invited to watch proceedings. It is contemplated Indian and Kashmir state troops could maintain law and order during this period. (Secret, 501.BC/1-2148: Telegram, The United State Representative at the United Unions (Austin) to the Secretary of State, New York, January 21, 1948, Foreign Relations, 1948, V. P. 285)

Truman knows that Nehru is not sincere about the plebiscite. Note US Ambassador’s remarks about the Bharti conditions for conducting the plebiscite.

“Ayyangar (Dr. Gopalaswami Ayyangar, Bharti representative to present Bharti case on the Kashmir issue) outlined plan given above under 2 (b) at some length to Ambassador Austin in conversation January 21. By asking pertinent questions re possibility such plan creating atmosphere for a fair and impartial plebiscite Ambassador Austin clearly conveyed US doubt that Indian plan could lead to peaceful solution Kashmir problem.” (Secret, 501.BC/1-2148: Telegram, The United State Representative at the United Unions (Austin) to the Secretary of State, New York, January 21, 1948, Dispute Over Kashmir and Hyderabad, Foreign Relations, 1948, V. P. 285)
-Anxiety exits in Delhi on the occupation of Kashmir
- Nehru threatened Pakistan for supporting Azad Kashmir Government and “raiders.” Secret Document 1)
- There will be a revolution in Pakistan if Pakistani leadership tries to stop the freedom fighter who are fighting against the Bharti occupation of Kashmir and its puppet government in Bharti occupied Kashmir (Secret Document 1)

Jafar Syed
M.A. LL.B.
Researcher-International Affairs
New York

US Secret document1. Truman auctions Kashmiri nation

1948. Die is cast and Kashmir nation is sold down the river. Nehru is a secret agent of Truman. (Part 1-3. US secret documents, Nehru standing naked in the global square, muslimdailyny.org). Ambassador Vijaya Lakshmi Pandit is a listening post of America (Obama policy shift worries Bharat, muslimdailyny.org). Pakistanis and Kashmiris have been fooled since 1948 by the American leadership. Truman knows the game plan of Nehru. Secret documents prove this fact without any doubt.

Secret documents labeled 1 reveals the following facts. 1. Anxiety exists in Delhi 2. Nehru uses occupation of Kashmir to strangle and dismember Pakistan. 3. Pakistan is ready for fair plebiscite.

“1. Have talked with Jinnah (Mohamed Ali Jinnah, Governor General of Pakistan), Liaquat Ali Khan (Prime Minister, Minister of State and Defense, Pakistan), Sir Zafrullah Khan (Minister of Foreign Affairs and Commonwealth Relations, Pakistan), Secretary General Mohammad Ali and Ikramullah (Secretary for Foreign Affairs, Pakistan) and nowhere have detected any trace of anxiety or nervousness such as seems exists in Delhi on Kashmir question, although profound annoyance is felt that GOI is using Kashmir affairs as excuse for not making good its commitments on cash balances, failure to pay which under terms recent agreement places GOP in difficult fiscal position, as presumably desired by GOI (Deptel 218, London’s 53, December 29)

“GOP answered GOI note night before last. In nearly two hours review of Pakistan’s relations with India, Mohammad Ali and Ikramulla told me yesterday GOP note contained no ultimatum or time limit for reply but did contain some hints of trouble for Pakistan if GOP did not cease alleged aiding and abetting Azad Kashmir Government and raiders. In this connection, these officials said while Pakistan’s sympathies were with Azad Government GOP was not aiding Azad movement and could not if it would stop uprising against Kashmir Government and the struggle against GOI troops in Kashmir without revolution in Pakistan.

“Mohammad Ali, who participated in talks with GOI said GOP position in all these talks was that while welcoming in principle plebiscite in Kashmir, GOP must have assurance neutral administration preceding and during plebiscite. Given such administration GOP would exercise every possible influence with Azad Government and raiders to cease activities and abide by plebiscite result. If neutral administration cannot be agreed upon between GOI and GOP, as seemingly it cannot since every proposal that direction by GOP has been rejected by GOI, Pakistan will gladly agree UN Security Council set up appropriate administration with safeguards for honest vote and conduct of plebiscite. If GOI unwilling accept latter procedure, GOP will counter any action by GOI in placing before SC question alleged guilt Pakistan in supporting belligerent activities against Kashmir by asking SC conduct investigation all relations between the two Dominions including Junagadh matter. This is substance GOP reply notes.

“GOP thoroughly convinced Kashmir’s accession to India and sending of GOI troops to Kashmir is only part of GOI’s deliberately planned policy dating from acceptance partition, to strangle and destroy Pakistan in successive stages and will support that conviction before SC if GOI carries its case to SC form indicated in its last note to GOP.

“Department, repeat to London if desired. Delhi informed. Lewis.” (Secret, immediate, 745.45F/1-148: Telegram, The Charge in Pakistan, Lewis, to the Secretary, Karachi, January 1, 1948, Foreign Relation, Volume 5, P 265-266)   

 

//////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////
Part1. US secret documents: Nehru stands naked in the global square – 1948(Understanding the nature of US-Bharat relations is the key to understand the continued-pharaoh-like occupation of Kashmir, dismemberment and eventual destruction of remaining Pakistan) Highlights-        Nehru is an anti-Russian, anti-Asian and anti-Muslim under-water shark.-        Nehru relative impotency and swaddling clothes prevent him to declare war publicly against Russians … Ambassador Vijaya Lakshmi Pandit-        Anti-Muslims, anti- Russians and anti-Asians Nehru supports the slaughter of innocent Koreans by Truman-        Nehru cannot play the neutrality card and fool the word after signing a formal treaty with US-        Nehru does not double speak; he lies. Publicly grills Truman and then gives explanations for grilling Truman-        Nehru statement of March 8, 1948 is not anti-Truman. It is a joke. It was to fool the Russians and the Bhartis -        Nehru wishes to maintain officially a neutral position for his government  … H.V.R. Iengar, Acting Secretary General External Affairs-        American principles of democracy and those of India are identical … H.V.R. Iengar, Acting Secretary of General External Affairs-        Bharat is not a communist state or at least a fellow-traveling state. American imperialism is benign. On the contrary, Soviet imperialism uses the tools of aggression, pressure and the suppression of freedom. Bharati press is inexperience and irrational … Sir Girja Shanker Bajpai, Secretary General of the Ministry of External Affairs and Commonwealth Relations, Government of India-        Anti- Asia Nehru opposes the “United Nations of South Asia” to please his master Truman.-        Anti- Asia Nehru considers United Nations of South Asia as racial-        Anti- Asia Nehru does his best to quash the idea of a Marshall Plan for South Asia. He wanted every nickel and dime of American tax payers in his pocket. Note he is begging for help to develop hydro-electric developmental projects-        Nehru … Muslim nations have no right to be    represented in the Security Council-        Truman consents that Nehru can hide behind the veil of neutrality-        Truman suggests that Nehru adopts Canadian model to hide behind the veil of neutrality-        Churchill begging on his knees and crying Uncle Sam. It is in the psyche of the American leadership to protect the occupying powers. It does not matter it is world-wide occupier Britain or Bharat “You may have a completely subjugated, Nazified Europe established with swiftness, and the weight may be more than we can bear. I ask now is that you should proclaim non-belligerency. Immediate needs are: first of all, the loan of forty or fifty of your old destroyers to bridge the gap between what we have now, and the large new construction we put in hand at the beginning of the war. But if in the interval Italy comes in against us with another one hundred submarines, we may be strained to the breaking point. Thirdly, anti-aircraft equipment and ammunition, of which again there will be plenty next year, if we are alive to see it. Sixthly, I am looking to you to keep the Japanese dog quiet in the pacific, using Singapore in any way convenient.” Roosevelt and Churchill.  The Secret Wartime Correspondence. -         Harry S. Truman (1945-1953), Jawaharlal Nehru (1947-1964) and Joseph Stalin (1922-1953) are the main actors in 1948. This is the reasons that their names are used as the main actors on the world stage instead of using the names of their representatives Jafar Syed M.A. LL.B.Researcher – International AffairsNew York03.29.2010 1948. Nehru waives the neutrality flag – Part 1  Introduction. Nehru is an anti-Russian, anti-Asian and anti-Muslim under-water shark. He wants to hide behind the veil of neutrality and begs to Truman for keeping the neutrality veil. He also gives the reasons for not siding with the US publicly against the Russians. Nehru reasons that Soviet aggression, internal situation, Bharti impotency as a nation and Bharti swaddling clothes are sufficient reasons to keep the veil of neutrality Canadian mask fits Nehru Nehru convinces Truman that in spite of the veil of neutrality, he sides with Truman in international arena. Nehru claims that he supports the butchery of Korea by Truman and backs U.S. stance against Ukraine. Nehru assures Truman that Bharat is not a communist state or fellow traveling state. He commits that in case of a war, Bhartis will side with the Americans against the Russians. For Nehru, American imperialism is benign whereas Soviet imperial is coercive. He opposes the United Nations of South Asia and a Marshall Plan for South Asia.   Being a shoe-licker of Truman, he begs for the Security Council seat held by the Muslim nations. He also begs for American financial and military aid. And Truman agrees that Nehru can hide behind the veil of neutrality. Canadian model is suggested by Truman for keeping the face of Nehru wrapped with neutrality.  Note the suggestions of Mr. Raymond A. Hare, SOA, for Brigadier D. Chaudhuri, Military Attaché, and Mr. I.S. Chopra, First secretary, Indian Embassy.  “In ensuing general discussion Mr. Hare [Mr. Raymond A. Hare, SOA] observed that, because of the multitudinous aspects of our over-all relations, the American Government has not found it practicable in the past to conduct comprehensive over-all discussions of bilateral relations. In addition, he pointed out that, in any event, it would in all probability be undesirable to attempt to establish a formal blueprint of relations inasmuch as such blueprint would imply detailed implementation, and possible failures of implementation in unpredictable circumstances might result in negation of the original desire to solidify relations. He cited as an example that, as close and friendly as American relations have traditionally been with the Government of Canada, we have never held comprehensive discussions of over-all policy but have dealt with each problem as it arose using as background the broad understanding and communities of interest which existed between the two countries. In this connection Mr. Hare said that in his opinion the same type of broad understanding and communities of interest existed between the people of America and the people of India and their governments, and that this had become apparent in numerous discussions such as those between Mr. Henderson, Mr. Lovett, and Sir Girja Bajpai during Sir Girja’s recent visit to the Unites States. (Secret, 711.45/5-1`748, Memorandum of Conversation, by Joseph S. Sparks of the Division of South Asian Affairs, [Washington,] May, 17, 1948, Foreign Relations, 1948, Volume V. P. 512) On an other occasion when H.R. Iengar, Acting Secretary General External Affairs is begging for keeping the neutrality veil on the face of Nehru, Grady, the US Ambassador in India also agreed that Nehru can hide behind the veil of neutrality.   “I [Grady] said that I did not see any objection to this policy but found it hard to understand the Prime Minister’s frequent reference to imperialism and that I had heard from reliable sources that Prime Minister had been critical of our government and of America. Iengar said that as one who had been intimately associated with the Prime Minister for long time he found it hard to believe this as Prime Minister never criticized America to him. (Secret, 845.00/3-2048: Telegram, The Ambassador in India (Grady) to the Secretary of State, New Delhi, March 20, 1948 – noon, Foreign Relations, 1948, Volume V, P. 498)       A. Reasons for waiving the neutrality card 1. Ambassador Vijaya Lakshmi Pandit, Indian Ambassador in the Soviet Union, gives two reasons for hiding behind the veil of neutrality. One reason is the relative impotency of Prime Minister Nehru. The other reason is that Nehru is still in swaddling clothes.  “She [Vijaya Lakshmi Pandit, Indian Ambassador in the Soviet Union] informed me [Grady, US Ambassador in India] Nehru and most Indians leaders had long since made up their minds natural alignment was with the west, but that Nehru felt at present in view Indian relative impotence and fact that nation is still in swaddling clothes it would be ridiculous to talk publicly of military participation in event of war. Her belief, which apparently reflects that of brother, is that India’s present role in family of nations should be modest and relatively humble one until nation has solved own internal difficulties. (Top SECRET, The Ambassador in the Soviet Union (Smith) to the Secretary of State, Moscow, March 20, 1948 – I p.m., Foreign Relations, Volume V, P. 500) 2. Another agent of Nehru also parroted the reasons for keeping the neutrality veil. They are almost the same reasons which are given by Ambassador Vijaya Lakshmi Pandit for hiding behind the veil of neutrality.“Sir Girja said that he appreciated the importance of Mr. Henderson’s [Loy W. Henderson, Director of the Office of Near Eastern and African Affairs] remarks and was gratified that the U.S. Government was aware of the basic democratic orientation of the Government of India. He went to point out that India’s position had been more accurately reflected in the 1947 UNJA than in the 1946 session, citing India’s support of our stand with respect to Korea and other issues. This brought him to the principal point he desired to make. Should the world once again become involved in conflict, India could only associate itself with those nations holding the same ideals of freedom and democracy. However, his Government is not able to make an open declaration of its position as it could not now withstand the aggression from Russia or the internal difficulties which might ensue.” (Secret, 845.00/3-2348:Telegram, The Ambassador in India (Grady) to the Secretary of State, New Delhi, March 23, 1948 –2 p.m., Discussions between the United States and India, concerning India’s attitudes toward the United States and the Soviet Union, and Indian requests for financial and military aid, Foreign Relations, Volume V, 502-503)Who is giving justifications for not publicly siding with the US against the Russians?  He is Sir Girja Shanker Bajpai, Secretary General of the Ministry of External Affairs and Commonwealth Relation, Government of India.     B. Reasons for not signing any formal agreements with US 1. Nehru is reluctant to sign any formal treaty with the United States. Why? By signing a formal treaty with the U.S, he cannot hide behind the veil of neutrality. He wants to be a shark under the water. All dealings should be under the table – even requested deal of B-25’s and exchange of top secret Indian military information. (Muslim Daily, Part 2, Nehru Secret agent of US) “SIR: I have the honor [US Charge in India Donovan] to refer to secret dispatch no. 21, from the American Embassy at Karachi, dated January 13, 1948, suggesting that consideration be given to providing some financial aid to Pakistan in connection with negotiations with that country of a treaty of friendship, commerce and navigation.  “The difficulty of proceeding with negotiations except on such a basis is fully appreciated. The situation is somewhat similar here, except that the Government of India has not asked for a loan. India, as in the case of Pakistan, is not in a position at this time to avail itself of many mutual benefits to be derived from a treaty of friendship, commerce and navigation with the United States and has shown no eagerness to begin discussion of such a treaty. (Secret, 711.45/1-2648, The Charge in India (Donovan) to the Secretary of State, No.71, New Delhi, January 26, 1948, Foreign Relations, 1948, V. 5, P. 499)                                                                           C. Secret assurance that veiled Nehru is an ally of Truman 1. H.V. Iengar, Acting Secretary General External Affairs is giving explanations about the speech which Nehru made on March 8, 1948. He assures U.S. Ambassador Grady that  American principles of democracy and those of Bharat are identical.  But Nehru wants to keep the veil of neutrality over his face. “225. Re Embdesp 237 March 6. At his request I [Grady, the US Ambassador in India] saw H.V. Iengar, Acting Secretary General External Affairs in Bajpai’s absence. Prime Minister wished him to discuss with me recent statement on foreign policy which Prime Minister made in Assembly. Prime Minister wanted to be sure US did not misunderstood what he was endeavoring to convey. The speech he said was primarily for home consumption and to say certain things to Russia which he felt should be said. He said that it was unthinkable that India should be on Russia’s side in event of conflict between Russia and US. American principles of democracy and those of India were identical. He wishes to main officially for government a neutral position.  (Secret. 845.00/3-2048: Telegram, The Ambassador in India (Grady) to the Secretary of State, New Delhi, March 20, 1948 – noon, Foreign Relations, 1948, Volume V, P. 498)     2. Another agent of Nehru also tries to dispel any suspicion that Bharat is not the foot soldier of American imperialism. He is Sir Girja Shanker Bajpai, Secretary General of the Ministry of External Affair and Commonwealth Relations, GOI. He even does not hesitate to throw the Bharti press under the buss to curry favor with the Truman administration.   “Having expelled the British, [You did not expel the British. Fact is that it was Hitler who destroyed British Empire and for that reason Britain could not continue the occupation of Bharat. War has weakened Britain so much that it could not continue even the occupation of Greece, a tiny Island].  India did not intend to take any other master in their stead. Sir Girja felt, however, that there was some impression in the United States that India was tending to become a Communist state or at least a ‘fellow traveling’ state. “He went on to say that he wanted to make it clear that the issue was not between ‘American imperialism’ and Soviet imperialism; that we had no objection to Russia’s establishing close relations with other nations provided that this were not done by aggression, pressure and the suppression of freedom; … “He said that the Indian press was inexperienced in the field of foreign affairs and that it was inclined to treat such matters in emotional rather then rational terms.” (Secret, 711.45/4-248, Memorandum of Conversation, by the Assistant Chief of the Division of South Asian Affairs (Mathews), [Washington,] April 2, 1948, Foreign Relations, 1948, Volume V, P. 502-503] Anti-Asia Nehru. Why? 1.   Nehru says no to the United Nations of Asia. Nehru is such a shameless creature that he does not hesitate to be a listening post of America in Russia. He does not hesitate to commit his country to fight against Russian in a Third World War. He does not hesitate to make anti-American statement to fool the Bhartis and the world. And he does not hesitate to oppose a United Nations of South Asia. He views United Nations of South Asia as racial. By opposing a United Nations of South Asia, he is currying favor with Truman. Any patriotic organization is a threat to “American imperialism.”   “Turning next to the question of India’s position in South Asia, Sir Girja said that India had no desire to form or to lead a South Asian block. He said in strict confidence that Thakin Nu [Prime Minister and Minister for National Planning] recently visited India, he brought with him a draft project for a ‘United Nations of South Asia’. This was studied by Nehru and the Foreign Office, and Thakin Nu was informed that India did not consider it desirable to establish such an organization which would detract from the authority of the global United Nations and introduced into world politics a further racial and regional element. India feels that its first task is to develop itself. (Secret, 711.45/4-248, Memorandum of Conversation, by the Assistant Chief of the Division of South Asian Affairs (Mathews), [Washington,] April 2, 1948, Foreign Relations, 1948, Volume V, P. 503] 2.   Nehru says no to Marshall Plan for South Asia. Nehru is not only against United Nations of South Asia, he is also against any Marshall Plan for South Asia. “Sir Girja said that he fully understood the necessity of the United States concentrating its attention at present on certain critical areas and he had not come to this country with any mendicant ideas. He had, in point of fact, done every thing he could to quash the idea of a Marshall Plan for South Asia which had been advocated by the Indian Ambassador in Washington in dispatches to New Delhi. (Secret, 711.45/4-248, Memorandum of Conversation, by the Assistant Chief of the Division of South Asian Affairs (Mathews), [Washington,] April 2, 1948, Foreign Relations, 1948, Volume V, P. 504) But the same Nehru, who opposes Marshall Plan for South Asia, begs for American assistance for Bharat. This is the reason that he opposes Marshall Plan for South Asia. He wants to grab every nickel and dime of U.S. tax payer excluding other South Asian nations.    “He [Sir Girja] referred to India’s desire to obtain American assistance in carrying out certain hydro-electric developmental projects and said that, although an approach had been made in this connection quite some time ago, no assistance had yet been coming. (Secret, 711.45/4-248, Memorandum of Conversation, by the Assistant Chief of the Division of South Asian Affairs (Mathews), [Washington,] April 2, 1948, Foreign Relations, 1948, Volume V, P. 504) Anti-Muslim Nehru Nehru is not only the enemy of Muslim Pakistan; he is also the enemy of the Muslim World. He opposes the Muslim representation in the Security Council.  “Sir Girja [Sir Girja Shanker Bajpai, Secretary General of the Ministry of External Affairs and Commonwealth Relations, GOI] returned to Mr. Henderson’s [Loy W. Henderson, Director of the Office of Near Eastern and African Affairs] following his interview with the Acting Secretary. He said that he had mentioned to Mr. Lovett India’s interests in being considered for the seat on the Security Council now held by Syria which the latter is vacating this coming fall. He pointed out that Asia had only two seats on the Security Council, one held be China [puddle of America] a permanent member, and other having been passed from one Islamic nation to another. He felt that the time had come for India to be the second Asian member and hoped that the United States would be inclined to support India candidacy. Particularly in view of our backing of India against the Ukraine last falls. Mr. Henderson said that Sir Girja had presented a good argument and that we would give very serious consideration to India’s claim.”(Secret, 711.45/4-248, Memorandum of Conversation, by the Assistant Chief of the Division of South Asian Affairs (Mathews), [Washington,] April 2, 1948, Foreign Relations, 1948, Volume V, P. 505) Sir Girja also begs for Security Council seat when he meets Acting Secretary of State lovett.   “In conclusion, Sir Girja observed that Syria would be leaving the SC next fall and that he hoped India might be considered for this seat, the second largest nation in Asia, had not yet been a SC member, and although he appreciated the circumstances which had led the US support Islamic states for the Second Asian place on the SC, China holding the first as a permanent member, he felt that the time might have come when India’s claim could be given serious consideration in view of our support of India against the Ukraine last fall. I [Lovett, Acting Secretary of State] commented that Sir Girja made a strong case for India, and suggested that he discuss this matter with Mr. Henderson.” (Secret, 711.45/4-248, Memorandum of Conversation, by the Acting Secretary of State, (Lovett), [Washington,] April 2, 1948, Foreign Relations, 1948, V. 5  P. 508) To be continued  1948. Bharat is an occupying power and American leadership is siding with an occupying power. Is it an anomaly in the history of America? The answer is no. It is in the psyche of the American leadership to protect the occupiers. Great Britain is the on the brink of elimination. Who saved it? American leadership. Note where the British were on May 15, 1940.  “Although I have changed my office, I am sure you would not wish to discontinue our intimate, private correspondence. As you are no doubt aware, the scene has darkened swiftly. The enemy [Germans] have a marked preponderance in the air, and their new technique is making a deep impression upon the French. I think myself the battle on land has only just begun, and I should like to see tanks engaged. Up to the present, Hitler is working with specialized units in tanks and air. The small countries are smashed up, one by one, like matchwood. We must expect, though it is not yet certain, that Mussolini will hurry in to share the loot of civilization. We expect to be attacked here ourselves, both from the air and by parachute and airborne troops in the near future, and we are getting ready for them. If necessary, we shall continue the war alone and we are not afraid of that. But I trust you realize, Mr. President, that the voice and force of the United States may count for nothing if they are withheld too long. You may have a completely subjugated, Nazified Europe established with swiftness, and the weight may be more than we can bear. All I ask now is that you should proclaim non-belligerency, which would mean that you should help us with everything        short of actually engaging armed forces. Immediate needs are: first of all, the loan of forty or fifty of your old destroyers to bridge the gap between what we have now, and the large new construction we put in hand at the beginning of the war. This time next year we shall have plenty. But if in the interval Italy comes in against us with another one hundred submarines, we may be strained to the breaking point. Secondly, we want several hundred of the latest types of aircraft, of which you are now getting delivery. These can be repaid by those now being constructed in the United States for us. Thirdly, anti-aircraft equipment and ammunition, of which again there will be plenty next year, if we are alive to see it. Fourthly, the fact that out ore supply is being compromised from Sweden, from North Africa, and perhaps from northern Spain makes it necessary to purchase steel in the United States. This also applies to other materials. We shall go on paying dollars for as long as we can, but I should like to feel reasonably sure that when we can pay no more, you will give us the stuff all the same. Fifthly, we have many reports of possible German parachute or airborne descents in Ireland. The visit of a United States squadron on Irish ports, which might well be prolonged, would be invaluable. Sixthly, I am looking to you to keep the Japanese dog quiet in the pacific, using Singapore in any way convenient. The details of the material which we have in mind will be communicated to you separately. (Doc. 8, Churchill to Roosevelt, May 15, 1940, Roosevelt and Churchill, Their Secret Wartime Correspondence, Edited by Francis L. Loewenheim, Harold D. Langley, and Manfred Jonas, P 94-95)
///////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////
Obama sanctions Americans assassinations

(Statements of Congressman Ron Paul and Congresswoman Lynn Woolsey prove that Obama is not an agent of change. He is continuing the bloody policies of Baby Bush)  Highlights-         Secret arrests, secret renditions, torture, and assassinations are illegal under both domestic and international law … Congressman Paul-         National Intelligence Director Dennis Blair acknowledged that American citizens can indeed be assassinated at our government's discretion Congressman Paul-         When the Afghan people see the corruption in their government, they ask, and they should ask, why should we help the Americans defeat the Taliban when our government isn't any better than the Taliban? … Congresswoman Ms. Woolsey 
Jafar SyedM.A. LL.B.Researcher – International AffairsNew YorkWhat have we allowed ourselves to become? Are we no longer a Nation of laws? Have we become instead a Nation of men who make secret arrests? Are secret prisons now simply another tool of Federal Government law enforcement? Is secret rendition of individuals now permitted, out of misplaced fear? Have we decided that the writ of habeas corpus is not worth defending? Is torture now an acceptable tool for making us safe? Unfortunately, the single answer to all of these questions from the leaders of our country and to many of our citizens appears to be ``yes''. And now we are told that assassination of foreigners as well as American citizens is legitimate and necessary to provide security for our people. It is my firm opinion that nothing could be further from the truth. Secret arrests, secret renditions, torture, and assassinations are illegal under both domestic and international law. These activities should be anathema to the citizens of a constitutional Republic.The latest outrage is the current administration's acknowledgment that we now have a policy that permits assassination not only of foreign suspects, but of American citizens as well. Of course the CIA has used secret assassinations in a limited fashion for decades, despite international, domestic, and moral law. When done secretly, as in the past, our government at least recognized that assassination was illegal and wrong. Frighteningly and astonishingly, however, the policy is now explicit. National Intelligence Director Dennis Blair, in open testimony before the House Intelligence Committee on February 3 of this year, acknowledged that American citizens can indeed be assassinated at our government's discretion, deplores Congressman Paul on the House floor on February 24, 2010. He warns the futility of this immoral and illegal policy and alerts Americans about the spread of this policy. “Yes, I know that artificially generated fear makes a large number of Americans inclined to applaud this effort which supposedly will make us safe. But if this becomes standard operating procedure and a permanent precedent is established, let me assure you that this abuse of the law will spread.”  Paul, AND NOW IT'S ASSASSINATIONS?, House of Representatives, February 24, 2010, Page: H798 Congresswoman Ms. Woolsey informs the Americans about the corruption in Afghan government.“When the Afghan people see the corruption in their government, they ask, and they should ask, why should we help the Americans defeat the Taliban when our government isn't any better than the Taliban?”She also questions the justification of defending a corrupt government with the blood of Americans.  The United States is reaching a bleak milestone in Afghanistan. The death toll for our troops is now 996, or it was when this paper was written. It is inevitable that we will reach the 1,000 mark. How much further are we going to go in this? Congresswoman Woolsey, CORRUPTION IN AFGHANISTAN THREATENS OUR TROOPS, House of Representatives - February 24, 2010, Page: H795.

 Statements of Congressman Paul and Congresswoman Woolsey prove that Obama is not an agent of change. In fact he is pursuing the policies of Baby Bush. The only difference is of style. That makes him more dangerous.     
///////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////
Obama policy shift worries Bharat?

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

  Highlights
- Muslim world should know that Bharti leadership champions the continued ccupation of Muslim Afghanistan
- India-up exposes Gandhi as phony champion of non-violence. He wanted a united Bharat just like Hindu racist leadership. Only tactics were different
- Bharat has been the operational arm of U.S. worldwide occupation
- Bharat has been the “listening post” of America
- Churchill was wedded to Zionist policy
- After Bombay attack, it was not the U.S. diplomacy that stopped Bharti attack against Pakistan. Fact is that Bharati military was not prepared to attack Pakistan. Friends of India Zardari and  Newaz Sharif should know
- Chances of making Pakistan the lap dog of Bharat are brighter under the leadership of Zardari and under the leadership of opposition leader Niwaz Sharif. Both do not believe in the existence of Pakistan as a separate state. One believes in “borderless border world” and other views the partition as a Berlin Wall. 
-  Mr. B. Raman, India could not have exited without the US protective umbrella. Occupied Khalsas, Kashmiris and other occupied nationalities would have won freedom from Brahmin Raj. Do not brag that India could become a hegemon without US protective umbrella.  
- Bharti leadership bribed the Baby Bush to sign the nuclear deal by throwing the bone of arms procurement of $80b dollar   
- Bharat wants to achieve two objectives by purchasing $80 billion arms. First, it wants to counter china. Second, it wants to eliminate Pakistan
- In spite of $80 billion arms procurement, China-Pak relations worry Bharat
- Bharati spin doctors assert that Obama will not protect Bharti interests as Baby Bush did.
- Bharat is one country of sub-continent India. It has no right to call itself India. India as a country ended with the partition of 1947
- Bharti leadership waved the Soviet Union card to fool the world in Cold War; now its spins doctors are waving China and Pakistan cards to fool the world. America was told again and again that if Washington’s doors are shut, Soviet Union’s doors were open. Now China and Pakistani cards are being waved. Fact is that Bharat was the secret agent of America in Cold War. In the changed circumstances, secrecy is not required
-  Un-subdued- broad-hearted and broad-shouldered Pashtoons are one of the segments of anti-occupation forces who are still challenging the Bharti occupation of Kahmiris. They must be incorporated or destroyed. Remember London Conference
- China military muscles worries America and India
- Bharat will be an operational arm of America in the Indian Ocean
 
Jafar Syed
M.A., LL.B.
Researcher – International Affairs
New York

There is no more tussle between Pentagon and State Department about India’s regional and international role; China is no more “the” factor in US-India relations; and Pakistan has again emerged as a factor in U.S. India relations. These facts prove that Obama’s administration is drifting away form the policies of Bush administration, laments B. Raman in India Abroad of January 29, 2010.

Solution? Fool China and Pakistan by “reviewing”  Bharat-China and Bharat-Pakistan relations. 

“There is definitely a need for such an examination in respect of our relations with China. As the scope for convergence of US-India perceptions and policies relating to China gets increasingly reduced during Obama’s term in office, it is important for us to strike out our own in refashioning our policies towards China. 

“Even in respect of Pakistan, the time has come to have a re-look at our policies to decide to what extent our fixation with certain issues has served us well. It is possible to give a strategic depth to our relations with Pakistan?” (B. Raman, Strategic course correction, India Abroad, January 29, 2010)

Mr. Raman also brag that “India’s relevance and acceptability as a major Asian power will not be determined by continuing to hang on to US coat-tails.”

It is the time-tested trick of Jewish and Hindu leadership to paint the American leadership as the enemy of Israel and Bharat (one country of Indian sub-continent). Using this trick, Jewish and Hindu leadership fool the world by muffling pro-Israel and pro-Bharat acts of the American leadership.

Applying this time tested trick, Bharti spin doctors are manufacturing a myth to fool the world. They claim that Obama is less inclined to serve the Bharti   interests than President Bush.

“Under Bush, Gates was a supporter of the multi-dimensional strategic relationship with India, covering civilian nuclear cooperation, military supply relationship, networking between the armed forces of the two countries, a high-profile role for India in maritime security and maritime counter-terrorism  and an important role for India as a respected US interlocutor in assessing the implication of China’s rise as a modern military power in the wake of its rise as an economic power aspiring for a parity of status with the US.” (B. Raman, “Strategic course correction, January 29, 2010)

The fact is that Obama administration might prove more pro-Bharat than Bush administration.

Proof? Who wants the butchery of Afghans to continue? India. Remember, in his recent visit, Prime Minister Manmohan Singh demanded publicly that Obama should not end the occupation of Afghanistan. Obama buckled under the pressure.

“America’s premature exit form Afghanistan is one of New Delhi’s biggest worries.
“Kabul, Islamabad and Beijing dominated Defense Secretary Robert N. Gates’s New Delhi visit, in that order. He assured Indian Prime Minister Manmohan Singh that the United States will not pull out by 2012 if the Afghanistan region is not stable.
“Gates and before him Richard Holbrooke, on their visit to New Delhi, assured the Indian establishment that America will not exit from Afghanistan in 2011.” (India ready to dance if the music is right, Sheela Bhatt, India Abroad, January 29, 2010)

View from another angle US- Bharat relations under Obama administration. Will there be any change in military, economic and political policies under Obama administration? Answer is no. Will Obama administration challenge the occupation of Kashmir by Bharat? Answer is no.  Will encirclement of China by Obama administration continue?  Answer is yes.

Why does the so-called shift worries Bharti spin doctors?

Fact is that there is no shift in U.S. policy as Bharat is concerned. U.S. and Bharat are brothers in arms. The only thing that has changed is the political map of the Muslim World.

Obama’s inherited-world is different from Bush’s  inherited world. When Bush inherited the world, Sadam was the greatest threat to Jewish occupiers of Palestine. He had to be eliminated from the political scene. After his elimination and destruction of Iraq, Jewish occupation of Palestine is cemented. Now what Bush administration did for the Jewish occupiers of Palestine, Obama administration has designed to do for Hindu occupiers of Kashmir.

To achieve this purpose, every entity must be destroyed which stands for the rights of occupied Kashmiris. Destruction of anti-occupation forces will   give free ride to Bharti occupiers.

Un-subdued- broad-hearted and broad-shouldered Pashtoons are one of the segments of anti-occupation forces who are still challenging the Bharti occupation of Kahmiris. They must be incorporated or destroyed. Remember London Conference

So-called shift in China policy by Obama administration is opportunistic. Spin doctor B. Raman knows this fact.  To put a chook-hold around Iran economically, politically and militarily, China endorsement is a must. To neutralize China, overtures must be made to fool the Chinese leadership.

Spin doctor B. Raman is complaining this so-called policy shift. He knows that US and Bharat are joined by the hip.  The moment Iran is destroyed, China containment by US-Bharat will surface again.

View destruction of Iran from another angle.  Destruction of Iraq guaranteed Bush second term as a president. Destruction of Iran will guarantee Obama’s second term in office as president. 

Third, will Obama administration do any thing to cripple the Bharti military machine of death and destruction? Answer is no. It will do every thing in his power to feed Bharti military machine of death and destruction. Proof?

“In the last few years, the prospects of US supplies of military hardware to India have increased. We have seen recently that the Indian Air Force is placing an order to buy 10 Boeing C-17 advanced airlift aircraft via the foreign military sales program for over $2.4 billion. The letter of request was issued in January 8. It’s the biggest-ever deal with the US surpassing the P-81 long range maritime re-connaisance aircraft of last year for $2.1 billion. The Indian army is going to buy artilleries as well for the first time in many years. The US is fast emerging as a favored weapon supplier. Since 2001, it has clinched deals over 3.29 billion supplying India 12 Thales-Raytheon Systems AN/TPQ-37 (V) Firefinder artillery radar , the USS Trenton – renamed INS Jalashwa – and six embarked second-hand UH-3H Sea King helicopters. Six C 130 J Super Hercules military transporters are also added to the purchase list. (Rahual Bedi, The strategic expert discuses India’s military status with Sheela Bhatt, India Abroad, January 29, 2010)

Will Obama administration cancel existing military contract? Answer is no.

Will Obama administration not ink future military contract with Bharat. Answer is no.

“The Indian military has embarked on a huge modernization drive. In just the next three to four years India will spend $30 billion. By 2022, India is posed to spend another $50 billion; $80 billion is a huge amount of money.” (Rahual Bedi, The strategic expert discuses India’s military status with Sheela Bhatt, India Abroad, January 29, 2010)

Bharti leadership bribed the Baby Bush to sign the nuclear deal. “Also, an implicit provision of the nuclear deal was the payback factor. When there is a recession in the US arms industry is also affected. In view of it such Indian purchases do matter to the US-India military, defense procurement ties will grow over the 10 years.(Rahual Bedi, The strategic expert discuses India’s military status with Sheela Bhatt, India Abroad, January 29, 2010)

And note the difference between the words and the deeds of non-violent Bharat of Gandhi. Rahul Bedi, strategic expert, is not ashamed of that Bharat has become the global bazar of arms. He is proud of Bharti shopping of arms “The fact is everyone has opened the shop in India because nobody buys as India does. India is in the process to buy 197 helicopters. In 10 years times, India will need 600 helicopters. India is looking for 3,600 artillery guns worth about $12 to 14 billion.” (Rahual Bedi, The strategic expert discuses India’s military status with Sheela Bhatt, India Abroad, January 29, 2010)

Bharat wants to achieve two objectives by buying  $80 billion arms. First, it is determined to counter china, and its second objective is to eliminate Pakistan.

“The Chinese are growing not only in assets but also in terms of operation. That is worrying the Americans and worrying the Indians a lot. So, the Indian modernization plan is to meet China. If they meet the Chinese at some level it will take care of Pakistan.” (Rahual Bedi, The strategic expert discuses India’s military status with Sheela Bhatt, India Abroad, January 29, 2010)

Bharat will be an operational arm of America in the Indian Ocean.

“Also, the Indian Navy is important for America. The India Ocean is going to become a zone of conflict because 60 to 70 percent of world commerce passes through here. The US has said in many research papers that the Indian Navy could be the stabilizing agent. Without the assets of the Indian Navy, security of India Ocean is difficult. (Rahual Bedi, The strategic expert discuses India’s military status with Sheela Bhatt, India Abroad, January 29, 2010)

One of the most startling facts surfaced in the interview. It was not the US diplomacy which stopped Bharat to invade Pakistan. It was that Bharti army was not ready to invade Pakistan. Zardari, friend of Bharat, should know this fact. Niwaz Sharif who does not believe in Pakistan existence should also know this fact. 

“Definitely! As everyone knows, defence preparedness was found wanting after the 2008 Mumbai attacks. When the war council was called after the Mumbai attack, the air force is the only wing that is supposed to have expressed its ability to bomb targets across the Line of Control in Pakistani occupied Kashmir. The India army was very hesitant because they said that if the India force goes for this bombing then there will be reaction from Pakistan and the army may or may not be able to take care of that spread." (Rahual Bedi, The strategic expert discuses India’s military status with Sheela Bhatt, India Abroad, January 29, 2010)

In spite of $80 billion arms procurement, China-Pak relations rattle Bharat. “The Indian defense establishment is always worried when American supplies go to Pakistan but these days the defense forces are more worried about Chinese supplies to Pakistan. The Chinese are supplying frigates, warships, tanks, combat aircraft, tanks, missiles and artilleries. They are supplying the entire range of military equipment. They have robust joint development programs in all the three services. The Indian vice chief of the air staff has said that Pakistan’s exports of military goods are far ahead of Indian exports.” (Rahual Bedi, The strategic expert discuses India’s military status with Sheela Bhatt, India Abroad, January 29, 2010)

The last world. Christian, Jewish and Hindu leadership are united to destroy the Muslim World.  As the Christian and Jewish leadership is concerned, their destructive policy did not start today. Note: Churchill was wedded to Zionism.

“I hope you will let me see beforehand the text of any message you are thinking of sending me upon the anniversary of the Atlantic Charter of August 14. We  considered the wording of that famous document line by line together and I should not be able, without mature consideration, to give it a wider interpretation than was again agreed between us at the time. It proposed application to Asia and Africa requires much thought. Great embarrassment would be caused to the defence of India at the present time by such a statement as the Office of War Information has been forecasting. Here in the Middle East the Arabs might claim by majority they could expel the Jews from Palestine, or at any time forbid all further immigration. I am strongly wedded to the Zionist policy, of which I was one of the authors. This is the only one of the many unforeseen cases which will arise from new and further declaration. (Roosevelt and Churchill, Their Secret Wartime Correspondence, Edited by Francis L. Loewnheim, Harold D. Langley, and Manfred Jonas, Doc. 155, Churchill to Roosevelt, August 9, 1942, P. 244)

The Hindu leadership became the listening post of America after the establishment of Bharat in 1947.

“Can confirm information given by Chinese Ambassador New Delhi to ambassador Grady on statements of Mrs. Pandit. She has had similar confidential conversation with me and, I believe, with heads practically all mission in Moscow except Soviet satellites.

“She is obviously much concerned at Molotov’s change in attitude, but there is no real reason why she should be as both British Ambassador and myself has warned her honeymoon period for her would be last few months and thereafter she would have to take bitter with sweet, with emphasis on former.

“She asked my advice as to whether, in event public opinion in India further aroused, it would be good move for India to discontinue present relations with USSR, and said public opinion in India so aroused it would probably be difficult to send another chief of mission when she left. I told her I thought it would be tactical disadvantage, as India so close to USSR it should be decided advantage to maintain adequate listening post Moscow.

“She emphasized her brother [Prime Minister Nehru] had been deeply affronted by actions and attitude of Soviet Ambassador New Delhi. She herself now restricts her attendance at Soviet Officials functions to about fifteen minutes.

“She informed me Nehru and most Indian leaders has long since made up their minds natural alignment was with West, but that Nehru felt at present in view Indian relative impotence and fact that nation is still in swaddling clothes it would be ridiculous to talk publicly of military participation in event of war. Her belief, which apparently reflects that of brother, is that India’s present role in family of nations should be modest and relatively humble one until nation has solved internal difficulties. “TOP SECRET, The Ambassador in the Soviet Union (Smith) to the Secretary State, Moscow, March 20, 1948 – 1 p.m., Foreign Relations, 1948, Volume V, P. 499-500)        

World must know by this time that acrobats-policy-shifts are part of the American leadership. With the shifting sands, it is ready to sleep with Stalin and Mao if it serves its world wide occupation. Even Hitler was acceptable if he had invaded Soviet Union in the first phase of war. Sadam was acceptable when he turned against the Iranians. Iran was acceptable when U.S. was butchering the Talibans. Iran was also acceptable when Iraqi were butchered to oust Sadam.

As a student of history, you want to go back. Spain and France were allies to oust Great Britain in the so-called war of independence. The moment Great Britain was kicked out of occupied America, policy changed towards Spain and France. After World War 11, Soviet Union of Stalin became the No. I enemy of the “free world.” After the elimination of Sadam Hussain, Iran became the greatest threat to the Israel and American allies in the region.

But there are two exceptions. They are Jews and Hindus. In any circumstances, US leadership has been there to extend its protective umbrella for these occupying races.  

Why?

//////////////////////////////////////////////////////
Jewish factor and presidential election

July 30, 2004

(Almost every article by the author is published in Muslim print media or is posted on Muslim Websites. Posted on muslimdailyny.org on  December 28, 2009


Highlights:

-...there are more than fifty tactics that the Jewish leadership uses to keep its worldwide empire afloat. It operates from America. It is the patriotic duty of every American to expose that how the Jewish leadership is using the American power to further its won agenda at the expanse of the American interests. Few voices have raised their concerns about the Jewish anti-American agenda. It is a positive development. But more is needed.

-The only thing which matter in Washington … is if the people in the Bronx and Brownsville and Borough Park begin to mutter in their beards, they’ll be damned if they continue to cast their votes to a party that breaks its pledges to them …. You let me have the Jewish vote of New York and I will bring you the head of Ibn Saud on a platter! The Administration will sell all seven Arab states if it is a question of retaining the support … of the Jews of New York alone; never mind the rest of the country. (P. 175, Israel in the Mind of America)

- Another tactic. Jewish leadership always talks about the percentage of the Jewish vote a presidential gets. Why? The reason is obvious. If it says that Bush Jr. got 170,000 Jewish votes nationwide, every body will laugh. Because these are laughable numbers. Millions of votes are cast in a presidential election, what relevance 170,000 votes have? But when it says, “Bush won about 17 percent of the Jewish vote in 2000, but supporters are aiming to raise that to about 30% in this election, based largely on his support for Israel.” Maura Reynolds and Peter Wallsten. May 19, 2004. This 17 percentage makes a reader confused. He might think that 17 percent Jewish votes mean 5 million or ten million. A reader should know that Jewish leadership claims that there are about 5 million Jews in this country. Out of these five million, one million are eligible to vote. So 17 percent is a negligible figure as Jewish power is concerned. But it muffles the reality. Second, Jewish leadership always inflates the Jewish population all over the world to make the Jewish race conspicuous for political reasons.

 


Jafar Syed

M.A. LL.B.

Researcher – International Affairs

New York

Part One

There are more than forty million African Americans, more than forty million Hispanics, sixteen million East Asians and four million South Asians in the United States. If glued together, they are one hundred million. They are more than one-third of the entire U.S. population. It is about two hundred eighty two million today. If the system is fair, what should be the representation of the people of color in the Senate and in the House? In the Senate of one hundred senators, there should be at least thirty-three senators representing the Americans of Colors. In other words, every third senator should be of Color. World should not be surprised to know that there is not a single African American Senator to represent forty million African Americans. World should not be surprised to know that there is not a single Hispanic senator to represent the forty million Hispanics. These are the two largest communities of color in the United States.

House of Representatives houses four hundred and thirty five representatives. There should be at least one hundred ten Colored representatives. But this is not the case. They are almost fifty percent less than their numerical strength.

One important explanation. Why is some representation of African American and Hispanic in the House of Representatives and why is zero representation in the Senate? The reason is obvious. Senate elections are contested on state level. White Democrats, including the White Jews, do not vote for the candidates of communities of color. They opt for their White candidates. On the contrary, House elections are not contested on state level. There are contested on district level. In most of the districts which elect Hispanic and African Americans are heavily populated by the Hispanic and Africans. To win an election, Hispanic and African Americans do not need the votes of the White Democrats. This is the reason that these two communities have some representation in the House. Even this less than fair representation is not acceptable to the white ruling elite – Republicans and Democrats. To contain the representation of the communities of color, recently attempts are made to destroy these African American and Hispanic districts by ‘redistricting.’

Now step into the wonderland. Close your eyes and then open it. If you are in the Senate, you will find every 9th White Jewish senator is sitting there. There were 11 senators at the beginning of the present Congress, which is called 108th Congress. Jewish senators are here state by state. 1. Barbara Boxer (D-Calif). 2. Dianne Feinstein (D-Calif). 3. Norm Coleman (R.Minn). 4. Russel Feingold (D.Wisc). 5. Herb Kohl (D-Wisc.) 6. Frank Lautenberg (D-N.J). 7. Carl Levin (D-Mich). 8. Joseph Lieberman (D-Con.) 9. Charles Schumer (D-N.Y.) 10. Alsen Spector (R-Pa) 11. Ron Wyden (D-Ore).

What is the total population of the Jews in the United States? Twenty percent? No. Fifteen percent? No. Ten percent? No. Five percent? No. Three percent? No. Estimated Jewish percent of total population is 2.2 according to the Jewish sources. Depending on these sources, the Jewish leadership claims that Jews are 6,155,000 in the United States. With full confidence slash half of these numbers. They might be about 3 million in the entire US. Jewish leadership always pretends to be what it is not. It creates an aura of magnanimity, which the Jewish leadership uses to fool and harass the friends and foes.

Muslim leadership should conduct a study of its own about the total Jewish population. Because they are the main victim of Jewish leadership’s monopoly. The study should be done, borough-by-borough, city-by-city and town-by-town. And the numbers collected by this study should be compared to the published numbers of the Jewish leadership. At least Americans should know that how many Jews are really in the U.S. and what should be their fair share of representation. And if the Jewish leadership argues that their over-representation is the blessing of an ‘open democracy,’ case should be made that why this blessing fails to bless forty million African Americans and forty million Hispanic Americans.

Now compare the percentage of the Jewish population from where these Jewish senators prop up. In California, Jewish leadership claims that Jews are 2.9 percent. California is the largest state with a population of 34,000,000. In Minnesota, they are 0.9 percent – only 42,000. Total population of the state is 4, 931,000. In Wisconsin, Jews are 0.5 percent – only 28,000. Total population of the state is 5,372,000. In New Jersey, the Jewish leadership claims that Jews are 5.7 percent. Total population of the state is 8,429,000. In Michigan, Jews are 1.1 percent. Total population of the state is 9,952,000. In Connecticut, remember, Joseph Lieberman state, Jews are 3.2 percent. Total population of the state is 3,410,000. In New York, remember, Charles Schumer State, Jewish leadership claims that Jews are 8.7 percent. Total population of the state is 18,999.000. In Pennsylvania, Jews are 2.3 percent of the population. Total population of the state is 12,283,000. In Oregon, Jews are 0.9 percent – only 32,000. Total population of the state is 3,429,000.

What this representation demonstrates? First, the Jews have a total monopoly in two states. They are California and Wisconsin. In both states, only Jews are representing the entire state. 34,000,000 Californians could not find a single Californians than the Jews to represent the entire state. No White, no Hispanic, no African American and no East Asian were more capable are equally capable than the Jews to represent the state. Only Jewish Barbara Boxer and Jewish Dianne Feinstein are fit to represent the largest state in the Union. In Wisconsin, again the Jewish leadership is in complete control of the political system. Both senators are Jewish. No White, no Hispanic, no African American and no East Asian were more capable or equally capable than the Jews to represent the state. Only Russell Feingold and Herb Kohl are fit to represent. Third, Jews cannot win a single seat in the Senate on the strength of their own population in any U.S. states. This is again emphasized that the Jews cannot win a single seat in the Senate on the strength of their own population in the 9 states, which are now represented by them. Fourth, out of these 11 Jewish senators, 9 are ‘Democrats.’ Only two Jewish senators are ‘Republicans.’ Jews and Republicans? Do not be surprised; this is a recent acrobat by the Jewish leadership. With the rise of the “Christian Right,” Jewish leadership has started flirting with the Republicans – a favorite party of the “Christian Right.” In American political system, it is very easy to find out which state is Republican or Democrats. An opportunist can join a state according to the political orientation of the state.

Who vote and why Jewish senators in the statewide senate elections win? White Republicans definitely does not vote for them. Ninety five percent members of the Republicans are White. Their votes are for Republicans in a contest between Democrats and Republicans. There are rare exceptions. If White Republicans do not vote for the Jewish democrats then who vote for the Jewish senators? Americans of Color – African Americans, Hispanic, East Asians and South Asian vote for Jews overwhelmingly. Without their support a single Jewish senators cannot win a seat in the Senate.

If the Americans of Color are kingmaker, why they themselves do not become kings themselves. The answer is very simple. The Democratic political machine is exclusively white. It can stomach White Jewish senators but not senators of Color.

 

Part Two

If every 9th senator in the Senate of 108th Congress was Jewish in January 2003, there were twenty-six Jewish Congressmen in the House of Representatives.

Jewish Congressmen state be state. 1. Gary Akerman (D- N.Y.) 2. Eliot Engle (D- N.Y.) 3. Steve Israel (D- N.Y.) 4. Nita Lowey (D- N.Y.) 5. Jerry Nadler (D- N.Y.) 6. Anthony Weiner (D- N.Y.) 7. Shelley Berkley (D- Nev.) 8. Howard Berman (D- Calif.) 9. Susan Davis (D- Calif.) 10. Bob Filner (D- Calif.) 11. Jane Harman (D- Calif.) 12. Tomas Lantos (D-Calif.) 13. Adam Schiff (D- Calif.) 14. Brad Sherman (D- Calif.) 15. Howard Waxman (D- Calif.) 16. Eric Cantor (R- Va.) 17. Ben Cardin (D- Md.) 18. Peter Deutsch (D- Fla.) 19. Robert Wexler (D- Fla.) 20. Rahm Emanuel (D- Ill.) 21. Jan Schakowsky (D- Ill.) 22. Barney Frank (D-Mass.) 23. Martin Frost (D-Texas) 24. Sander Levin (D- Mich.) 25. Steve Rothman (D- N.J.) 26. Steve Sanders (Ind- Vt.)

Now compare the percentage of the Jewish population where from these Jewish members of the House prop up. In California, Jewish leadership claims that Jews are 8.7 percent. Total population of the state is 18,990,000. In Nevada, Jewish leadership claims that Jews are 3.8 percent. Total population of the state is 2,019,000. In California, Jewish leadership claims that Jews are 2.9 percent. Total population of the state is 34,000,000. In Virginia, Jewish leadership claims that Jews are 0.9 percent. Total population of the state is 7,104,000. In Maryland, Jewish leadership claims that Jews are 0.4 percent. Total population of the state is 5,311,000. In Florida, Jewish leadership claims that Jews are 3.9 percent. Total population of the state is 16,054,000. In Illinois, Jewish leadership claims that they are 2.2 percent. Total population of the state is 12,436,000. In Massachusetts, Jewish leadership claims that they are 4.3 percent. Total population of the state is 6,357,000. In Texas, Jewish leadership claims that Jewish population is 0.6 percent. Total population of the state is 20,947,000. In Michigan, Jewish leadership claims that Jews are 1.1 percent. Total population of the state is 9,952,000. In New Jersey, Jewish leadership claims that Jews are 5.7 percent. Total population of the state is 8,429,000. In Vermont, Jewish leadership claims that Jews are 0.9 percent. Total population of the state is 610,000.

What these numbers demonstrate? First, that the Jews are over represented in the House as they are over represented in the Senate.

Evaluate state by state how much they are over represented. New York State is entitled to elect 29 members. There are 6 Jews who are representing the state. It means that every 5th Congressman from the New York State is Jewish. Jewish share should be 8.7 percent according to the Jewish own sources. Nevada is entitled to elect 2 members. There is one Jew who is representing the state out of two members. It means that the Jews have 50 percent of the seats. Jewish share should be 3.8 percent and not 50 percent according to the Jewish own sources. California is entitled to elect 53 members. There are 8 Jews who are representing the state. It means that every 7th Congressman from California is Jewish. Jewish share should be only 2.9 percent according to the Jewish own sources. Virginia is entitled to elect 11 members. There is one Jew who is representing the state. Jewish share should be 0.9 percent according to the Jewish own sources. Maryland is entitled to elect 7 members. There is one Jew who is representing the state. Jewish share should be 4 percent according to the Jewish own sources. Florida is entitled to elect 25 members. There are 2 Jews who are representing the state. Jewish share should be 3.9 percent according to the Jewish own sources. Illinois is entitled to elect 19 members. There are 2 Jews who are representing the state. Jewish share should be 2.2 percent. Massachusetts is entitled to elect 10 members. There is one Jew who is representing this state. His name is Frank, Barney. He is the only member in the House who is openly homosexual and he is proud of his homosexuality and not ashamed of. In one of the heated debate in the House of Representative, he challenged another fellow Congressman by asking him that how his sexual relations with another man hurt that Congressman. He is the defender of homosexuality and homosexuals in the Congress. Homosexuality is an abominable sin in all three religions –Judaism, Christianity and in Islam. Jewish share should be 4.3 percent in Massachusetts according to the Jewish own sources. Texas is entitled to elect 32 members. There is one Jew who is representing the state. Jewish share should be 0.6 percent according to the Jewish own sources. Michigan is entitled to elect 14 members. There is one Jew who is representing the state. Jewish share should be 1.1 percent according to the Jewish own sources. New Jersey is entitled to elect 13 members. One Jew is representing the state. Jewish share should be 5.7 percent according to the Jewish own sources. Vermont is entitled to elect one member. The only member who is representing the entire state is Jewish. Jewish share should be 0.9 percent according to the Jewish own sources. Vermont is the smallest state in the Union. 610,000 citizen of Vermont could not find a single Catholic or Protestant to represent them. No White, no Hispanic, no African American and no East Asian was more capable are equally capable than the Jewish member to represent the state.

Second fact, the Jewish representation in the House proves that they represent only 12 states. It means that they are very vulnerable. Any demographic change or ideological shift in these states can end the Jewish representation in the House. The same situation exists in the Senate. The Jewish senators like the Jewish congressmen come only from 9 states. So they are also very vulnerable. Third, Jewish representation in the House proves that the Jewish leadership runs the entire political show in America. No other religious or ethnic minority has the manipulative power to grab so many seats in the House of Representatives or in the Senate when their percentage of population is less than one percent. Fourth, not a single Jew can be in the House or in the Senate without the votes of the Americans of the Color - African Americans, Hispanics, East Asian or South Asian. Fifth, out of 26 members, 24 members belong to Democratic Party. One is Republican and one is independent. This fact leads to another conclusion. When the Jewish leadership claims that Jews vote overwhelming for Democratic Party, it is not telling the whole story. In fact, they are voting for their Jewish senators and Jewish congressmen and not for the Democratic Party.

Jewish leadership is realizing itself that they are becoming less and less relevant as their voting strength is concerned. “ Allan J. Lichtman, an American University historian and author of several books on handicapping presidential races, said that the Republicans think they can get some Jewish votes in 2004, but the numbers are limited. Too few Jewish votes in play come Election Day, experts say.” James D. Besser, The Jewish Week, July 6, 2004.

 

Part Three

If Jews are less than one percent of the American voters according to their own sources, what tactics the Jewish leadership applies to pose itself the kingmaker in the American politics. It propagates and boasts that no presidential candidates can say no to the Jewish leadership and survive. “The only thing which matter in Washington … is if the people in the Bronx and Brownsville and Borough Park begin to mutter in their beards, they’ll be damned if they continue to cast their votes to a party that breaks its pledges to them …. You let me have the Jewish vote of New York and I will bring you the head of Ibn Saud on a platter! The Administration will sell all seven Arab states if it is a question of retaining the support … of the Jews of New York alone; never mind the rest of the country.” P. 175, Israel in the Mind of America.

Another tactic. Jewish leadership always talks about the percentage of the Jewish vote a presidential gets. Why? The reason is obvious. If it says that Bush Jr. got 170,000 Jewish votes nationwide, every body will laugh. Because these are laughable numbers. Millions of votes are cast in a presidential election, what relevance 170,000 votes have? But when it says, “ Bush won about 17 percent of the Jewish vote in 2000, but supporters are aiming to raise that to about 30% in this election, based largely on his support for Israel.” Maura Reynolds and Peter Wallsten. May 19, 2004. This 17 percentage makes a reader confused. He might think that 17 percent Jewish votes mean 5 million or ten million. A reader should know that Jewish leadership claims that there are about 5 million Jews in this country. Out of these five million, one million are eligible to vote. So 17 percent is a negligible figure as Jewish power is concerned. But it muffles the reality. Second, Jewish leadership always inflates the Jewish population all over the world to make the Jewish race conspicuous for political reasons.

Jewish leadership uses another tactic to make itself relevant in a presidential election. It portrays itself the vital factor in battle ground states. Battle ground states are those states where both parties hope for a victory. Jewish leadership says that in the battlegrounds states like Florida, Ohio, Pennsylvania, Nevada, Missouri, New Jersey, and in Illinois, Jewish votes can make a difference. Let us see what story the numbers tells.

Florida 16,054,000. Ohio 11,360,000. Pennsylvania 12,283,000. Nevada 2,019,000. Missouri 5,603,000. New Jersey 8,429,000. Illinois 12,436,600. Total population of these 7 states is more than 68 million.

What role one million Jewish votes all over the United States can play in these seven battleground states? Jewish leadership cannot claim that all Jews live in these 7 states.

Suppose 100,000 Jews lives in these states. How this negligible numbers can make a difference in the states of 68 millions Americans.

These days Jewish leadership is talking about another tactics. It is the Jewish swing votes.

What it means? It means that Jews are not going to vote as a block to a Democratic candidate. It is said again and again that Bush Jr. might chip away some votes or about 30 percent – 300,000 votes out of 1,000,000 total Jewish votes. This 300,000 Jewish swing votes are tossed again and again a turning point in the American political history. Republicans and Democrats both are warned again and again that this time Jewish votes are not granted. Both parties have to earn them by addressing the Jewish concerns. “The strong Jewish independent bloc, and its growing willingness to consider GOP candidates, is an unmistakable warning to Democratic leaders that its candidates must speak more clearly on the issues Jews care about –foreign and domestic – if it wants to keep Jewish votes and, more importantly Jewish campaign money. The rise of a growing Jewish swing vote could be a force for moderation in both parties. Swing votes are more valuable than safe votes. When both parties are forced to compete for a community’s vote, the community’s concerns will be heard; its interests looked after. That’s the good news just beneath the surface of last week’s Gallup poll.” James D. Besser, The Jewish Journal of Greater Los Angles.

The Gallup poll, which is referred to, says that 50 percent Jews identify themselves as Democrats, only 17 percent Republicans and 33 percent independent (swing).

“ Last week’s Gallup Poll on Jewish political affiliation had some good news for both Democratic and Republicans, but most of all, it had good news for the Jewish community. Jewish democrats reacted gleefully to one finding – that approximately 50 percent of Jews identify themselves as Democrats, only 17 percent as Republicans. That’s is stinging refutation of perennial claims by the Republicans that Jews are on the verge of a great political migration. In fact, a year’s worth of Jewish –GOP outreach has convinced only a measly few Jews to don the GOP label.” James D. Besser, The Jewish Journal of Greater Los Angeles.

Note again the percentage of Jews votes is given even by Gallup poll. If Gallup polls say that there are only 500,000 Jewish votes in the entire United States. Out of these 500,000 Jewish votes, 250,000 are democrats 87,000 are Republicans and 165,000 are independent, Jewish real size in the American politics will be exposed. But it does not happen. No body can even dare to dispute anything that Jewish leadership says. Even the difference of opinion becomes anti-Jewish. Note recent indifferent opinions aired by a former governor, by a general, and a sitting senator were, greeted with hostility.

Another factor, which is told again and again by the Jewish leadership with purpose, is that Jews vote ‘overwhelmingly’ for Democratic Party.

(Remember always their negligible numbers and not the percentage of votes for Democratic Party).

Do the Jews vote ‘overwhelmingly’ for the Democrats? No. The fact of the matter is that the Jews do not vote for the Democratic Party but they vote for the Jewish candidates in the Senate and in the Congress. Let us see what the numbers say again. Who many Jewish senators are Democrats and how many are Republicans? See with your naked eyes that how many Jewish senators are Democrats and how many are Republicans. 1. Barbara Boxer of Californian? Democrat. 2. Norm Coleman of Minnesota? Republican. 3. Russell Feingold of Wisconsin? Democrat. 4. Dianne Feinstein of California? Democrat. 5. Herb Kohl of Wisconsin? Democrat. 6. Frank Lautenberg of New Jersey? Democrat. 7. Carl Levin of Michigan? Democrat. 8. Joseph Lieberman of Connecticut? Democrat. 9. Charles Schumer of New York? Democrat. 10. Arlen Spector of Pennsylvania? Republican. 11. Ron Wyden of Oregon? Democrat.

So do the math. There were 11 Jewish senators in the Senate of 100 Senators. Nine of them were ‘Democrats’ and 2 were ‘Republicans.’ when the 108 Congress started functioning in January 2003. So when about 500,000 Jews vote all over the United States in a senatorial election, they do not vote ‘overwhelmingly’ for the Democratic Party, but for a Jewish candidate for Senate. Why do the Jews not run as Republicans? More than 90 percent of Republican Party members are White. It is difficult for the Jewish leadership to fool them. It is easier to fool the Americans of Color in the Democratic Party by claiming their friends. So it is not the love of the Democrat Party that Jewish candidates choose to run as Democrats.

Do 500,000 democrat Jews nation wide vote for the Democratic Party when they vote for the members of House of Representatives? They again do not vote for the Democratic Party like senatorial races. They vote for their Jewish brother and sisters who are fooling the Americans by running as Democrats. Note one by one the ‘political affiliation’ of the Jewish members of the House of Representatives. 1. Gary Ackerman of New York? Democrat. 2. Shelley Berkley of Nevada? Democrat. 3. Howard Berman of California? Democrat. 4. Eric Cantor of Virginia? Republican. 5. Ben Cardin of Maryland? Democrat. 6. Susan Davis of California? Democrat. 7. Peter Deultsch of Florida? Democrat. 8. Rahm Emanuel of Illinois? Democrat. 8. Eliot Engel of New York? Democrat. 10. Bob Filner of California? Democrat. 11. Barney Frank of Massachusetts? Democrat. 12. Martin Frost of Texas? Democrat. 13. Jane Harman of California? Democrat. 14. Steve Israel of New York? Democrat. 15. Tom Lantos of California? Democrat. 16. Sander Levin of Michigan? Democrat. 17. Nita Lowey of New York? Democrat. 18. Jerry Nadler of New York? Democrat. 19. Steve Rothman of New Jersey?
Democrat. 20. Bernard Sanders of Vermont? Independent. 21. Jan Schakowsky of Illinois? Democrat. 22. Adam Schiff of California? Democrat. 23. Brad Sherman of California? Democrat. 24. Howard Waxman of California? Democrat. 25. Anthony Weiner of New York? Democrat. 26. Robert Wexler of Florida? Democrat.

So do the math again. There were 26 Jewish members in the House of Representatives. Out of these 26 Jewish members, 24 of them were ‘Democrats’ one was ‘Republican’ and one was ‘independent,’ when the 108 Congress started functioning in January 2003.

So when about 500,000 Democratic Jews vote all over the United States in the House election, they do not vote ‘overwhelmingly’ for the Democratic Party, but they vote for a Jewish candidate for the House. Why do the Jews do not run as Republicans for the House? More than 90 percent of Republican Party members are White. It is difficult for the Jewish leadership to fool them. It is easier to fool the Americans of Color in the Democratic Party by claiming their friends. So it is not the love of the Democrat Party that Jewish candidates for the House to choose to run as Democrats.

In short, there are more than fifty tactics that the Jewish leadership uses to keep its worldwide empire afloat. It operates from America. It is the patriotic duty of every Americans to expose that how the Jewish leadership is using the American power to further its won agenda at the expanse of the American interests. Few voices have raised their concerns about the Jewish anti-American agenda. It is a positive development. But more is needed.

As the coming election is concerned, Jewish leadership has decided to garbage president Bush. Reason or Reasons? It has used this Baby Emperor to the last extent and now he is no more needed. It is one of the reasons. But the only hurdle,
which it is facing to oust Bush Jr., is ‘Christian Right.’ It is sticking with Bush.

And this is a new phenomenon, which Jewish leadership is facing. Will the rise of ‘Christian Right’ prove the end of Jewish leadership monopoly over the U.S. political system? Time will tell? It is another topic that requires an in-depth discussion.

Script embedded in HTML

Website Builder